Study ties water value among irrigators to forest restoration

May 31, 2013
Study ties water value among irrigators to forest restoration

At least in the case of Verde Valley, downstream irrigators are willing to pay for restoration of a forest they cannot see to preserve a resource that is currently free.

That was the conclusion reached by researchers from Northern Arizona University, who recently published their findings in Water Resources Research.

The interdisciplinary team, funded by a National Science Foundation grant, investigated the idea of whether water users would be willing to pay for water that flows into their irrigation ditches from upstream—if the payment funded that would keep the forests healthy.

"The water currently has no associated with it, so we wanted techniques to find its value and find funding mechanisms for supporting forest restoration," said Abe Springer, professor in NAU's School of and .

To do so involved background research by Wes Swaffar, then a graduate student at NAU, on models of payment for watershed services. Julie Mueller, assistant professor in the W. A. Franke College of Business and lead author of the study, then developed a of surveying irrigators and quantifying their responses.

The researchers found, somewhat to their surprise, that overall the irrigators were willing to pay for water that today entails only ditch maintenance costs.

"The general take-home point was that even though these people can't see the forest where the restoration would be occurring, they really knew and understood the connection between upstream and what they get coming through their ditches every year," said Swaffar, who has graduated and now works for the National Forest Foundation. "They would be willing to invest money to make sure that those services are maintained."

Implications for forest restoration projects such as the Four Forest Restoration Initiative remain to be resolved, although Springer said that policy analysis will be covered in upcoming research papers. What that policy will need to address, he said, is how to establish an acceptable funding mechanism when the resource provider is the federal government.

"The challenge is, how do you collect payments from the beneficiaries of water and transfer them to the provider?" Springer said.

Explore further: Halliburton pays $1.1 bn for Gulf of Mexico BP spill

More information: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10… /wrcr.20163/abstract

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Scientists lay path to global restoration

Apr 22, 2013

(Phys.org) —Scientists have proposed a practical way to tackle the urgent need to restore huge areas of badly-degraded forest and grassland worldwide, based on Australian environmental experience.

Recommended for you

Halliburton pays $1.1 bn for Gulf of Mexico BP spill

24 minutes ago

Oil services company Halliburton said Tuesday it would pay a $1.1 billion settlement over its role in the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil rig blowout that led to the United States' most disastrous oil spill.

Underwater grass comeback bodes well for Chesapeake Bay

59 minutes ago

The Susquehanna Flats, a large bed of underwater grasses near the mouth of the Susquehanna River, virtually disappeared from the upper Chesapeake Bay after Tropical Storm Agnes more than 40 years ago. However, ...

Clean air halves health costs in Chinese city

3 hours ago

Air pollution regulations over the last decade in Taiyuan, China, have substantially improved the health of people living there, accounting for a greater than 50% reduction in costs associated with loss of life and disability ...

User comments : 0