DARPA robotic hand prototype shows advanced moves (w/ video)

May 02, 2013 by Nancy Owano report

(Phys.org) —Robotic hands designed and engineered for versatility and dexterity in handling harmful, harmless, small, large, light, and heavy objects tease robotics teams today. The US government's DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) is getting attention this month in its steps forward to develop robotic hands that can do the jobs of the human hand's advanced movements, but capable of being built at less prohibitive costs.

A recently released DARPA video reveals how far robotic hands have come in manipulative mastery. The three-fingered hand, hardly human-like in appearance, nonetheless excels in function, as it is shown picking up objects from keys to transit cards to basketballs and heavy (50 pound) weights. The DARPA-funded work was conducted by iRobot of Bedford, Massachusetts, with support from Harvard University and Yale University. The hand prototype is part of DARPA's Autonomous Robotic Manipulation (ARM) project, on DARPA's ARM-H program track that looks at dexterous hands at a reasonable cost.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

The GRAB Lab site at Yale reported that "We have developed a new hand design for the DARPA ARM-H program, in collaboration with iRobot Corporation and researchers at Harvard University. This hand is underactuated, but retains critical in-hand manipulation capabilities such as reorienting grasped objects, and picking up small objects such as keys and pens. Of the three designs submitted to DARPA, our hand was selected for distribution to all participants in the DARPA ARM-S program."

The government program is specifically interested in lower-cost robot manipulators that can handle things with less human control. The interest is also in finding autonomous manipulation systems that can surpass the performance level of remote manipulation systems that are controlled directly by a human operator.

The , Harvard and Yale effort has resulted in a hand advanced enough to perform maneuvers that call for precision at a cost that makes a difference. According to reports, the prototype could be made at $3,000 per unit in batches of 1,000 or more, in contrast to the $50,000 price of current technology.

Explore further: Telerobotics puts robot power at your fingertips

More information: www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/DSO/Pro… ation_%28ARM%29.aspx

Related Stories

DARPA's two-armed robot handles tools at less cost

Apr 02, 2013

(Phys.org) —DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) is getting closer to its goal of securing robotic hands that mimic the hand's finer movements, at an affordable cost. A research project has ...

DARPA to invest in iRobot's inflatable robot arm

Aug 22, 2012

(Phys.org) -- In military operations there are a lot of things that need to be done besides fighting, and the US government is hoping to offload as much of those things as possible to robots. To that end, ...

Recommended for you

Why let your sales force influence product prices?

7 minutes ago

From the outside, you might not notice the ongoing tension within many large businesses: the battle between salespeople, on the one hand, and marketers and product managers, on the other. Because the salespeople ...

Breakthrough elastic cloud-to cloud networking

38 minutes ago

Scientists from AT&T, IBM and Applied Communication Sciences (ACS) announced a proof-of-concept technology that reduces set up times for cloud-to-cloud connectivity from days to seconds. This advance is a major step forward ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

VendicarE
4 / 5 (4) May 02, 2013
No self respecting Robot would use a key to open a door when knocking it down is a possibility.

Robots don't need keys.
Huns
1 / 5 (2) May 03, 2013
Can you imagine what lonely people will do with these?
QuixoteJ
1 / 5 (3) May 03, 2013
I'm all for this research, with one catch: it is only for the development of artificial limbs. To that end I think it's great. Robots are bad, but cyborgs are okay.