Wikipedia's 'Goan war' unmasked as elaborate hoax

Jan 08, 2013
It went undetected for five years on Wikipedia, but now a seemingly meticulous entry about a 17th century conflict between colonial Portugal and India's Maratha empire has been outed as a hoax.

It went undetected for five years on Wikipedia, but now a seemingly meticulous entry about a 17th century conflict between colonial Portugal and India's Maratha empire has been outed as a hoax.

"The Bicholim Conflict" of 1640-41, described in detail in the online piece assessed as a "good article", has been unearthed not as an episode of Goan history, but a tale by a mischievous user.

Added to the site in July 2007, the entry was only uncovered as a lie by another eagle-eyed user in December.

"After careful consideration and some research, I have come to the conclusion that this article is a —a clever and elaborate hoax," wrote user "ShelfSkewed", who found the sources cited also did not exist.

The fantasy conflict has been added to Wikipedia's list of hoaxes that have dogged the site since it was founded in 2001, such as non-existent Bunaka and Gaius Flavius Antoninus, supposed assassin of .

"Fictitious war between the Portuguese rulers of Goa and the Maratha Empire which supposedly took place from mid-1640 to early 1641," says the new reference.

Wikipedia, which has editions in 285 languages, is open for anyone to edit and therefore "can be abused to create hoaxes", according to the site.

"Hoaxes in are considered vandalism, and persistent perpetrators of hoaxes are subject to blocking and banning."

Explore further: Fitbit to Schumer: We don't sell personal data

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Study finds major U.S. newspapers are warming up to Wikipedia

Apr 12, 2011

( -- Major newspapers in the United States are referencing Wikipedia more often and framing the online encyclopedia more positively in stories, according to a study by a pair of faculty researchers in the Virginia ...

Wikipedia losing editors, study says

Jan 04, 2013

Wikipedia, one of the world's biggest websites, is losing many of its English-language editors, crippling its ability to keep pace with its mission as a source of knowledge online, a study says.

Wikipedia hits defining moment in social Web era

Jul 14, 2012

Wikipedia, the public knowledge website, is more than a decade old and remains among the top 10 Internet sites in the world, but some say it is becoming old and dowdy. Others want to keep it that way.

Recommended for you

US warns shops to watch for customer data hacking

11 hours ago

The US Department of Homeland Security on Friday warned businesses to watch for hackers targeting customer data with malicious computer code like that used against retail giant Target.

Fitbit to Schumer: We don't sell personal data

Aug 22, 2014

The maker of a popular line of wearable fitness-tracking devices says it has never sold personal data to advertisers, contrary to concerns raised by U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer.

Should you be worried about paid editors on Wikipedia?

Aug 22, 2014

Whether you trust it or ignore it, Wikipedia is one of the most popular websites in the world and accessed by millions of people every day. So would you trust it any more (or even less) if you knew people ...

How much do we really know about privacy on Facebook?

Aug 22, 2014

The recent furore about the Facebook Messenger app has unearthed an interesting question: how far are we willing to allow our privacy to be pushed for our social connections? In the case of the Facebook ...

Philippines makes arrests in online extortion ring

Aug 22, 2014

Philippine police have arrested eight suspected members of an online syndicate accused of blackmailing more than 1,000 Hong Kong and Singapore residents after luring them into exposing themselves in front of webcam, an official ...

Google to help boost Greece's tourism industry

Aug 21, 2014

Internet giant Google will offer management courses to 3,000 tourism businesses on the island of Crete as part of an initiative to promote the sector in Greece, industry union Sete said on Thursday.

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jan 08, 2013
added to Wikipedia's list of hoaxes

It's a long list. Ranked by how long the page existed. It would be interesting if they could rank the list by the number of times each page had been viewed.
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 08, 2013
OMG! Of Course! The Bicholim Conflict was in 1460-61! Duh.
5 / 5 (1) Jan 08, 2013
I'm waiting for the Bollywood movie replete with heroes, villains and the comic clown.

Wikipedia however, should keep all the articles deemed hoaxes as a viewable part of the public record in an encyclopedia of wiki-hoaxes because it's just possible that a hoax can be perpetrated by a reviewer.
5 / 5 (1) Jan 08, 2013
Makes me think about a blog writer who once wrote that the possibility to rewrite history was one of the ten most dangerous consequences of digital technologies.
1.8 / 5 (5) Jan 08, 2013
That's nothing. Wikipedia maintains the absurd story that a goatherder living in a cave orchestrated a takeover of NORAD halfway around the world. Wikipedia simply copies Silverstien's [Mr. 'PULL IT'] POV as they do any victor of the spoils. Wikipedia is just another US propaganda tool playing poverty while rifling through their CIA slush fund behind closed doors.
3 / 5 (4) Jan 08, 2013
"History is a set of lies agreed upon."

Napoleon Bonaparte
5 / 5 (1) Jan 09, 2013
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. - H. L. Mencken
5 / 5 (1) Jan 09, 2013
Pretty good as hoax's go, but no where near as impressive as the Hoax that was the Bush Presidency.