Wikipedia's 'Goan war' unmasked as elaborate hoax

Jan 08, 2013
It went undetected for five years on Wikipedia, but now a seemingly meticulous entry about a 17th century conflict between colonial Portugal and India's Maratha empire has been outed as a hoax.

It went undetected for five years on Wikipedia, but now a seemingly meticulous entry about a 17th century conflict between colonial Portugal and India's Maratha empire has been outed as a hoax.

"The Bicholim Conflict" of 1640-41, described in detail in the online piece assessed as a "good article", has been unearthed not as an episode of Goan history, but a tale by a mischievous user.

Added to the site in July 2007, the entry was only uncovered as a lie by another eagle-eyed user in December.

"After careful consideration and some research, I have come to the conclusion that this article is a —a clever and elaborate hoax," wrote user "ShelfSkewed", who found the sources cited also did not exist.

The fantasy conflict has been added to Wikipedia's list of hoaxes that have dogged the site since it was founded in 2001, such as non-existent Bunaka and Gaius Flavius Antoninus, supposed assassin of .

"Fictitious war between the Portuguese rulers of Goa and the Maratha Empire which supposedly took place from mid-1640 to early 1641," says the new reference.

Wikipedia, which has editions in 285 languages, is open for anyone to edit and therefore "can be abused to create hoaxes", according to the site.

"Hoaxes in are considered vandalism, and persistent perpetrators of hoaxes are subject to blocking and banning."

Explore further: Twitter blocks two accounts on its Turkish network

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Study finds major U.S. newspapers are warming up to Wikipedia

Apr 12, 2011

( -- Major newspapers in the United States are referencing Wikipedia more often and framing the online encyclopedia more positively in stories, according to a study by a pair of faculty researchers in the Virginia ...

Wikipedia losing editors, study says

Jan 04, 2013

Wikipedia, one of the world's biggest websites, is losing many of its English-language editors, crippling its ability to keep pace with its mission as a source of knowledge online, a study says.

Wikipedia hits defining moment in social Web era

Jul 14, 2012

Wikipedia, the public knowledge website, is more than a decade old and remains among the top 10 Internet sites in the world, but some say it is becoming old and dowdy. Others want to keep it that way.

Recommended for you

LinkedIn membership hits 300 million

Apr 18, 2014

The career-focused social network LinkedIn announced Friday it has 300 million members, with more than half the total outside the United States.

Researchers uncover likely creator of Bitcoin

Apr 18, 2014

The primary author of the celebrated Bitcoin paper, and therefore probable creator of Bitcoin, is most likely Nick Szabo, a blogger and former George Washington University law professor, according to students ...

White House updating online privacy policy

Apr 18, 2014

A new Obama administration privacy policy out Friday explains how the government will gather the user data of online visitors to, mobile apps and social media sites. It also clarifies that ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jan 08, 2013
added to Wikipedia's list of hoaxes

It's a long list. Ranked by how long the page existed. It would be interesting if they could rank the list by the number of times each page had been viewed.
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 08, 2013
OMG! Of Course! The Bicholim Conflict was in 1460-61! Duh.
5 / 5 (1) Jan 08, 2013
I'm waiting for the Bollywood movie replete with heroes, villains and the comic clown.

Wikipedia however, should keep all the articles deemed hoaxes as a viewable part of the public record in an encyclopedia of wiki-hoaxes because it's just possible that a hoax can be perpetrated by a reviewer.
5 / 5 (1) Jan 08, 2013
Makes me think about a blog writer who once wrote that the possibility to rewrite history was one of the ten most dangerous consequences of digital technologies.
1.8 / 5 (5) Jan 08, 2013
That's nothing. Wikipedia maintains the absurd story that a goatherder living in a cave orchestrated a takeover of NORAD halfway around the world. Wikipedia simply copies Silverstien's [Mr. 'PULL IT'] POV as they do any victor of the spoils. Wikipedia is just another US propaganda tool playing poverty while rifling through their CIA slush fund behind closed doors.
3 / 5 (4) Jan 08, 2013
"History is a set of lies agreed upon."

Napoleon Bonaparte
5 / 5 (1) Jan 09, 2013
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. - H. L. Mencken
5 / 5 (1) Jan 09, 2013
Pretty good as hoax's go, but no where near as impressive as the Hoax that was the Bush Presidency.

More news stories

Making graphene in your kitchen

Graphene has been touted as a wonder material—the world's thinnest substance, but super-strong. Now scientists say it is so easy to make you could produce some in your kitchen.

Low tolerance for pain? The reason may be in your genes

Researchers may have identified key genes linked to why some people have a higher tolerance for pain than others, according to a study released today that will be presented at the American Academy of Neurology's 66th Annual ...

How to keep your fitness goals on track

(HealthDay)—The New Year's resolutions many made to get fit have stalled by now. And one expert thinks that's because many people set their goals too high.

Less-schooled whites lose longevity, study finds

Barbara Gentry slowly shifts her heavy frame out of a chair and uses a walker to move the dozen feet to a chair not far from the pool table at the Buford Senior Center. Her hair is white and a cough sometimes interrupts her ...