Damage to farms minimal under Basin plan

Oct 24, 2012
Professor Richard Kingsford. Credit: Grant Turner

For the first time, scientists at UNSW have investigated the likely impact of planned environmental flows on farmlands and nature reserves around the Murray-Darling Basin.

The new study suggests that damage from the flows proposed under the Basin Plan, which are designed to mimic natural flooding processes and improve ecological health, will be minimal to farming and other land use areas in the Basin.

"We found that, even with widespread flooding, most of the areas affected are floodplain areas, which are primarily used for livestock," said lead author Professor Richard Kingsford, Director of the Australian Rivers, Wetlands and Landscapes Centre at UNSW.

"Usually these landholders welcome floods as they rejuvenate floodplains and provide increased benefits to livestock."

Using satellite imagery, the researchers examined the maximum flooding and floodplain area in the , including 62,164 km2 of wetland, which covered 5.87 per cent of the land area of the entire Basin. These wetlands included all rivers, lakes, and floodplain areas that were inundated fully during a ten-year period (1984-1993).

According to Professor Kingsford: "These figures, representing maximum estimates of impact, clearly show that environmental flows are unlikely to have widespread impacts on agriculture across the Murray-Darling Basin. In fact, it is important to acknowledge that environmental flows are critically important to agriculture, providing good water quality, healthy rivers and benefits for grazing communities".

Key Findings:

  • Only 4.77% of wetland area encroached on irrigation areas; only 5.44% occurred in .
  • Most of the flooded area in the Basin consisted of a range of other land uses (89.79%).
  • More than half of this other land use (52.64%) was categorised for grazing, either in woodland or naturalised pasture; remaining land was not categorised or urban.
  • These grazing categories were the main land use in more than 50% of wetlands in 17 of the 25 catchments of the Basin.
  • When all wetlands on agricultural land were included (i.e. agricultural cropping, grazing, unallocated agricultural land), flooded land was predominantly in grazing areas (84.28%) in the Basin.
  • Of the 25 river catchments in the Murray-Darling , percentage areas of in irrigation areas were generally low: eight catchments had none; three had less than 1 per cent; seven had less than 5 per cent; and 5% had 5-20%.

Explore further: Far more displaced by disasters than conflict

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Dam risk to Murray-Darling wetlands may be underestimated

Jun 07, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Computer modelling used to develop the Murray-Darling Basin Plan may have significantly underestimated the effects of building dams and diverting water on the internationally listed Macquarie Marshes wetlands, ...

Rivers buckle under pressure from climate, dams

Mar 21, 2011

Climate change is likely to intensify the alarming rate of degradation of the world’s rivers and wetlands unless water resources are better managed, according to a special issue of the international scientific journal ...

Plan for crucial Australian rivers draws anger

Nov 28, 2011

Farmers Monday slammed the government's draft plan to rescue a crucial river system supplying Australia's food bowl, saying it will destroy communities and put pressure on food prices.

Australian floods help ease the 'Big Dry'

Apr 04, 2010

For Australian farmers who have struggled to make a living in southern Queensland as their crops died and their dams ran empty during years of drought, recent floods have helped ease the "Big Dry".

Recommended for you

Unforeseen dioxin formation in waste incineration

9 hours ago

Dioxins forms faster, at lower temperatures and under other conditions than previously thought. This may affect how we in the future construct sampling equipment, flue gas filtering systems for waste incineration ...

User comments : 0