Economists find Yelp significant to restaurants

Sep 05, 2012 by Sarah Yang
Economists find Yelp significant to restaurants
UC Berkeley economists found that online reviews can boost a restaurant’s business.

(Phys.org)—For anyone who has wondered whether crowd-sourced online reviews make a dent in a business's bottom line, the answer is an unequivocal yes, according to a new study by UC Berkeley economists.

Researchers analyzed restaurant ratings on .com and found that, on a scale of 1 to 5, a half-star rating increase translates into a 19 percent greater likelihood that an eatery's seats will be full during peak dining times. The study, published this month in the Economic Journal, found that the increase is independent of changes in price or in food and service quality.

"This is the first study to link online consumer reviews with the popularity of restaurants," said study lead author Michael Anderson, assistant professor of agricultural and resource economics. "We show that social media sites and forums play an increasingly important role in how consumers judge the quality of goods and services."

Anderson and study co-author Jeremy Magruder, assistant professor of agricultural and resource economics, analyzed 148,000 Yelp reviews for 328 restaurants in the .

Because Yelp rounds off a business's average rating to the nearest half-star—a 3.74 average would mean 3.5 stars, while a 3.76 would bump the restaurant up to 4 stars—the researchers were able to isolate the impact of the rankings from the overall quality of the restaurant.

The study found that moving from 3 stars to 3.5 stars increases a restaurant's chance of selling out during prime dining times from 13 percent to 34 percent, and that moving from 3.5 stars to 4 stars increases the chance of selling out during prime dining times by another 19 percentage points. These changes occur even though restaurant quality is held constant.

Not surprisingly, the found that crowd-sourced reviews have a bigger impact when there is a lack of alternative information available by which to judge a restaurant's quality. When the researchers parsed the data further, they found that restaurants rated in popular guidebooks or newspaper rankings did not see a statistically significant effect from the Yelp rankings.

"If a restaurant has a Michelin star or it appears in the San Francisco Chronicle's list of Top 100 Restaurants in the Bay Area, the Yelp star becomes irrelevant," said Magruder. "Those restaurants are relatively famous, and consumers already know them. For that were not on those established reviews, we actually saw a 27 percent greater likelihood in filled seats during peak dining times with a half-star rating increase on Yelp."

Could these findings lead to potential manipulation of the ranking system for profit?

"We considered that possibility, and our study indicates that so far, such manipulation is under control," said Anderson. "There are enough reviews available that it would be difficult to generate enough fake positive to drown out the bad ones. There is also an element of self-policing since customers going to a restaurant on the basis of a good fake review only to be disappointed could submit a bad review. It could be hard for the business owner to sustain the false positives over time."

The researchers are now looking to expand their analysis to sites such as Amazon.com, Tripadvisor.com and Netflix.com.

Explore further: How limiting CEO pay can be more effective, less costly

Related Stories

Google paid $125 million for Zagat: WSJ

Sep 09, 2011

Internet search and advertising giant Google paid around $125 million for restaurant review guide Zagat, The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday.

Use texting as reminder

Jan 28, 2009

There are lots of things you hear while you're out that you might want to remember later, such as the name of a movie to rent, restaurants to try or shows to program on the DVR.

Yelp shares surge in stock market debut

Mar 02, 2012

(AP) -- Yelp's stock opened to five-star reviews from investors on Friday, soaring 60 percent in the first hour of trading after pricing at $15 on Thursday night.

Recommended for you

College rankings go under the microscope

1 hour ago

Parents, students and admissions officials have combed through college and university rankings for years. However, education researchers have largely ignored the controversial lists. That's about to change, according to a ...

A call to US educators: Learn from Canada

15 hours ago

As states and the federal government in the U.S. continue to clash on the best ways to improve American education, Canada's Province of Ontario manages successful education reform initiatives that are equal parts cooperation ...

Devices or divisive: Mobile technology in the classroom

Apr 17, 2015

Little is known about how new mobile technologies affect students' development of non-cognitive skills such as empathy, self-control, problem solving, and teamwork. Two Boston College researchers say it's ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Squirrel
not rated yet Sep 06, 2012
"Could these findings lead to potential manipulation of the ranking system for profit?" Very much so: the findings suggests faking reviews will matter even in a large pool of honest ones since just adding a few fake ones could change a 3.74 average with 3.5 stars to a 3.76 average with 4 stars and a profitable 19% increase in full seating during peak times.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.