Left turn in speech research—Key insights in study of zebra finches

Aug 24, 2012 By Taylor Beck
Songbirds such as the zebra finch are of special interest in the study of speech because they learn to sing as humans learn to talk. Image: Wikimedia Common

Baby songbirds learn to sing by imitation, just as human babies do. So researchers at Harvard and Utrecht University, in the Netherlands, have been studying the brains of zebra finches—red-beaked, white-breasted songbirds—for clues to how young birds and human infants learn vocalization on a neuronal level.

While a baby bird mimicking the chirps of his "tutor" may seem far removed from human learning, the researchers at the two universities found that the songs of the birds and human language are both processed in similar areas on the left sides of the two very different brains. The discovery was published last month in the .

"You need a number of different that together give rise to ," says co-author Sharon Gobes, a researcher in Harvard's Department of Organismic and and a professor of neuroscience at Wellesley College. "You need an auditory area to perceive and store sounds, and a motor area to produce them. So evolution finds a solution, probably the simplest, which is why both [bird and human] species may have evolved lateralization."

Songbirds are of particular interest because they do something few animals can do: learn to speak. Our nearest ancestors, apes, don't learn new vocalizations—theirs are inborn—so we can't learn about language by studying their brains. But songbirds learn to sing as humans learn to talk—during a critical period, by imitating a parent. So by studying birdsong, we may gain insight into the underpinnings of human speech.

Why song and speech are lateralized to the left in both songbirds and humans remains a mystery. But Sanne Moorman, a doctoral student at Utrecht University and first author of the study, has some ideas.

"If you only use one hemisphere for language or song, you have more space left for something else," she said. Evolution seems to have built our brains and the birds' in the most economical way.

Explore further: Running robots of future may learn from world's best two-legged runners—birds

More information: www.pnas.org/content/109/31/12… 5a-b717-7aed534de244

Related Stories

Bird brains suggest how vocal learning evolved

Mar 12, 2008

Though they perch far apart on the avian family tree, birds with the ability to learn songs use similar brain structures to sing their tunes. Neurobiologists at Duke University Medical Center now have an explanation for this ...

Recommended for you

Four new dragon millipedes found in China

12 minutes ago

A team of speleobiologists from the South China Agriculture University and the Russian Academy of Sciences have described four new species of the dragon millipedes from southern China, two of which seem to ...

Scientist creates automatic birdsong recognition app

3 hours ago

Dr Dan Stowell, an EPSRC Research Fellow in QMUL's School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, has used a grant from Queen Mary Innovation to develop a prototype for an app that turns his research ...

New research reveals fish are smarter than we thought

4 hours ago

(Phys.org) —A new study from researchers in our Department of Psychology with colleagues at Queen Mary University of London has reported the first evidence that fish are able to process multiple objects ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

MrVibrating
not rated yet Aug 24, 2012
My pet theory on lateralisation is that prior to say, specialised speech areas and so on, there's another, more fundamental dynamic at play: The idea is that all the information we sample has to be delineated into temporal and spatial frequency components, and that this is done via "temporal integration windows" ranging from the very small, ms range, up to much larger sizes of seconds or more... and that there's a natural predilection for these to self organise from left to right (usually smaller on the left, progressing to larger on the right), across the cortex.

Thus lateralised faculties naturally slot into areas that already best match their normal distribution of spatial vs temporal freq. components.

In short, magnitude per se (numerical or abstract) favours a left-right representation, culminating in a left-side dominance for spatial components, & right-side for temporal. This allows for efficient parallel processing of info in both domains w/o conflicts between hemispheres..

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.