Explained: Near-miss asteroids (w/ Video)

Jun 29, 2012 by Jennifer Chu, MIT News Office

On May 29, an asteroid the size of a bus came whizzing past Earth at 10 times the speed of a fired bullet. The near-miss asteroid, named 2012 KT42 — or “KT42” for short — streaked across the orbits of weather and television satellites, 22,000 miles above Earth’s surface, making it the sixth-closest asteroid approach on record. While the object had little chance of colliding with Earth, its approach gave scientists an opportunity to run a rapid-response program — or as MIT’s Richard Binzel calls it, an asteroid-tracking “fire drill” — to gain as much information as possible from the incoming space rock.

“This thing missed, but chances are, at this size, we will one day find an object headed for an impact,” says Binzel, a professor of planetary sciences in MIT’s Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences. “Depending on where it’s falling, you might need to know whether it’s going to survive passage through the atmosphere, and how many fragments [will make impact]. We’d like to have the capability to deliver those kinds of answers, if we need to.”

Binzel is part of an international team of astronomers who monitor the skies for approaching asteroids. The scientists receive data from the Minor Planet Center (MPC), a clearinghouse for asteroid discoveries at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. Researchers at the MPC collect observational data from telescopes and satellites around the world, then calculate the orbits of asteroids and comets. Each day, the MPC sends out circulars to astronomers around the world, highlighting new objects discovered in space.

When an object’s orbit appears poised to bring it close to Earth, scientists like Binzel take particular notice. Binzel’s research group routinely reserves time at NASA’s Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF) on Mauna Kea in Hawaii, operating the telescope remotely from MIT to observe objects of interest. When Binzel receives an MPC circular, he scans the data for objects that may come close to Earth, and that are observable using the NASA scope.

In the case of KT42, the incoming asteroid fit both categories, but the scientists had to act fast: The asteroid was moving at high speed, and would streak past Earth within 24 hours, a small window for scientists to request observing time on the IRTF. Typically, researchers reserve telescope time months in advance, to observe distant planets and stars. In the event of an incoming asteroid, scientists may put in a last-minute proposal to interrupt a previously scheduled project, though these requests are not always guaranteed.

Tracking an asteroid

On Memorial Day, May 28, 18 hours before the asteroid’s closest approach to Earth, Binzel sent an alert to IRTF, along with a formal request to interrupt the telescope’s program. Several hours later, the facility approved the request, granting a small window of time to observe and track the asteroid: just after sunset in Hawaii, and just past midnight in Boston. At such a late hour, Binzel opted to observe the asteroid not from his MIT offices, but from an elaborate computer setup at his home.

“I have the capability of doing it from my attic,” Binzel says. “Once everything was set, I just waited until after midnight, then went upstairs.”

At the appointed time, Binzel fired up an array of computer screens, showing Skype sessions with the telescope’s operator, along with a support astronomer and technician in Hilo, Hawaii. Two more screens displayed images from the telescope’s camera, tracking the asteroid in real time, as well as light-intensity data. Over three hours, the researchers took measurements and tracked the asteroid’s incoming path.

“These readiness drills are important, because there’s a process to go through, and we want to make sure it works,” Binzel says. “In the event that we really need to work on short order, we’ll have confidence that we’ll be successful.”

In this case, the team quickly analyzed the data and calculated that the asteroid was about 23 feet wide, and likely made from a crumbly carbon material — a combination unlikely to penetrate Earth’s atmosphere intact. Binzel says in order for an asteroid to make impact, it would have to be much larger, and made from a hardier material, such as silica or iron. He speculates that an object 30 to 60 feet wide might make it through the atmosphere, breaking up into small meteorites before hitting the ground, while an asteroid 150 to 200 feet wide might hit the surface completely intact.

Far-flung objects

But what brings asteroids close to Earth in the first place? Most of them are located in the asteroid belt, a vast, cluttered region of the solar system that inhabits an orbit between Mars and Jupiter. These asteroids are leftover chunks of a planet that failed to fully form billions of years ago.

For the most part, these chunks of rock stay within the asteroid belt. But every so often, asteroids escape and travel as far as ’s orbit. For 200 years, why this happens remained a mystery.

In the 1980s, Jack Wisdom, a professor of planetary science at MIT, came up with a solution: He discovered that Jupiter’s gravitational field occasionally forces an asteroid out of its orbit, tugging at the asteroid repeatedly and stretching its orbit until, like an overstretched rubber band, the orbit snaps, flinging the asteroid into space.

“Once in a while, Jupiter will nudge things out and send them our way, for better or worse,” Binzel says. “The dinosaurs probably wish it hadn’t.”

Binzel is now looking for ways to improve the asteroid rapid-response program. The May 29 incident, he says, demonstrated a new level of readiness: Scientists were able to quickly gain access to the telescope facility, and the asteroid was the fastest object ever tracked by the telescope. The astronomers were also able to characterize the ’s size and composition in a limited amount of time — observations that would be essential in the event of an actual impact.

In the future, Binzel hopes to improve the telescope’s tracking ability, to observe even faster-approaching objects. The speed of KT42, he says, was at the upper limit of what the telescope could reliably track.

“This one was so close and so fast, it demonstrated a new level of capability of the telescope,” Binzel says. “Now we’re finding ways to improve for the next one.”

Explore further: Researchers explain magnetic field misbehavior in solar flares

Related Stories

3 Questions: Richard Binzel on near-Earth asteroids

Jun 28, 2011

On Monday at approximately 1:14 p.m. EDT, an asteroid named 2011 MD will pass only 7,500 miles above Earth’s surface — a close call in astronomical terms. The asteroid was discovered only last we ...

Scientists search for moons around asteroids

Oct 06, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Most people know that some planets have moons but would be surprised to know that some asteroids do, too. According to Joshua Emery, assistant professor of earth and planetary sciences at ...

8-meter-wide asteroid will pass close to Earth today

Jan 27, 2012

A small asteroid will pass extremely close to Earth tomorrow (January 27, 2012). Named 2012 BX34, this 11 meter- (36 feet-) wide 8 meter- (26-foot-) space rock (astronomers have updated their estimates of the ...

New horseshoe orbit Earth-companion asteroid discovered

Apr 06, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Apostolos Christou and David Asher from the Armagh Observatory in Northern Ireland announced the discovery of an asteroid near Earth called Asteroid 2010 SO16 and their findings were published ...

Recommended for you

Fragile mega-galaxy is missing link in history of cosmos

13 hours ago

Two hungry young galaxies that collided 11 billion years ago are rapidly forming a massive galaxy about 10 times the size of the Milky Way, according to UC Irvine-led research published Wednesday in the journal ...

Galaxy's Ring of Fire

May 18, 2013

Johnny Cash may have preferred this galaxy's burning ring of fire to the one he sang about falling into in his popular song. The "starburst ring" seen at center in red and yellow hues is not the product of ...

User comments : 20

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Kedas
4.3 / 5 (3) Jun 29, 2012
asteroid-tracking fire drill
OK, who isn't a bit worried after reading these words.
I prefer the words project/planning etc. if it involves asteroids
NotParker
1.6 / 5 (14) Jun 29, 2012
This thing missed, but chances are, at this size, we will one day find an object headed for an impact,

And it would have been detected sooner but the money for detection was squandered on some bogus global warming research. It was more important to have a computer model proving that the tide gauge data is wrong and that the fake 1 meter rise in sea level will happen in 2050 instead of 2100.
antialias_physorg
3.6 / 5 (8) Jun 29, 2012
Global warming kills more people that the occasional (smallish) asteroid ever could. So if you value getting you 'bang for your buck' climate research is certainly the thing to invest in.

That said these arguments "we spend X dollars on (the LHC, climate research, ...) and not enough on Y (hunger in Africa, looking for asteroids, ...)" are really all very inane.
we have limited astronomers and limited space observation capability. They're using what they can for that.

Dumping a lot more money into that sector will not get a lot better results. They're already looking into the likely avenues where asteroids may come from. Putting two telescopes on that will not detect one asteroid more.
sstritt
2.3 / 5 (6) Jun 29, 2012
Global warming kills more people

Show me proof that one person has died because of global warming. Just one.
NotParker
1.5 / 5 (8) Jun 29, 2012
Global warming kills more people that the occasional (smallish) asteroid ever could.


If it was warming a significant amount (.3C over 50 years is microscopic) it would lower winter mortality and save lives.

"This paper:
1. Lends support to Deschênes and Moretti (2009) paper which estimates that migration from the Colder Northeast to Southern areas of the U.S.is responsible for 8%-15% of the total gains in life expectancy in the U.S. population from 1970 to 2000."

http://www.nipccr...1a3.html
NotParker
1.7 / 5 (6) Jun 29, 2012

Dumping a lot more money into that sector will not get a lot better results. They're already looking into the likely avenues where asteroids may come from. Putting two telescopes on that will not detect one asteroid more.


Lucky for us no one listens to you.

"A California space research group plans to build, launch and operate a privately funded space telescope to hunt for asteroids that may be on a collision course with Earth, project managers said on Thursday."

"The technology exists to deflect an asteroid, provided it is found in time, added former shuttle and space station astronaut Ed Lu, the foundation's chairman and chief executive.

"I think it would be embarrassing if we were to be struck by a major asteroid in the next few decades simply because we didn't choose to do the mapping that's needed to find these asteroids," he said."

http://news.yahoo...nce.html
antialias_physorg
4.3 / 5 (6) Jun 29, 2012
Show me proof that one person has died because of global warming. Just one.

Show me proof that one person has died because of asteroids. Just one.

As for your proof: The increasingly hot summers have already taken their toll. Elderly people are dropping like flies.

A California space research group plans to build, launch and operate a privately funded space telescope to hunt for asteroids

Good for them. I merely wanted to express that these strawman arguments (we're putting too much money into X instead of Y) are just missing reality completely - and also show a shocking lack of understanding of how science works.
trekgeek1
3.8 / 5 (6) Jun 29, 2012
Global warming kills more people

Show me proof that one person has died because of global warming. Just one.


I'm not sure what your conditions for proof are. Any hurricane caused by climate change that killed people would fit the bill or even anyone who died from starvation or thirst because a drought wiped out their crops. The real trick is convincing a climate change denier that these things were caused by global warming. Once you've established that global warming is happening and that it leads to hurricanes and climate shifts resulting in killed crops, the conclusion follows naturally.
TheGhostofOtto1923
4 / 5 (8) Jun 29, 2012
Show me proof that one person has died because of asteroids. Just one.
""J. R. Hicks, a storeheeper, related Saturday that he stood in front of his store and saw a ball of fire shooting from the sky. It landed on the roof of William Peator's house he said. Mrs. William Peator, 43, and Ramond Ford Jr., her one year old nephew were killed."
http://www.dba-or...ople.htm

-HOW MANY TIMES must I say this? Research first then post!
GSwift7
3.3 / 5 (9) Jun 29, 2012
Global warming kills more people


Priceless.

However, there's a very good reason we spend a TON more money on climate research than we do on hunting NEO's. Whether global warming is worth spending money on is irrelevant. All human life is enhanced by a better understanding of weather and climate. It is unfortunate that spending on important research topics has been tied to environmental activism. I think that association hurts the real need for research about our atmosphere. There are more than enough reasons to spend large amounts of money on climate research, such as food supply, transportation, water management, urban planning, forest management, storm prediction and warnings, building codes, oil and gas market planning, and the list goes on and on. Very few parts of our daily lives are not directly affected by the weather. That research is infinitely more important than NEO searches.
NotParker
1.4 / 5 (10) Jun 29, 2012
Every penny spent on AGW research was wasted and much of it created negative wealth and made poor people poorer.

The AGW fraud has killed thousands of people by making energy artificially more expensive.

There should be a trial and all AGW researchers should go to jail for life.
SatanLover
1 / 5 (5) Jun 29, 2012
Elderly people are dropping like flies.

Good. let them be, they lived their lives. when i am old i don't want to be a burden anyway, my brain would be incapable of properly functioning why would i want to be alive like that?
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (6) Jun 29, 2012
Good. let them be, they lived their lives. when i am old i don't want to be a burden anyway, my brain would be incapable of properly functioning why would i want to be alive like that?

Not every old person has dementia. And with that type of attitude most of them are certainly worth more to humanity than you are.

Go away. You're wasting oxygen.
PhotonX
5 / 5 (5) Jun 29, 2012
And it would have been detected sooner but the money for detection was squandered on some bogus global warming research. blah blah blah
The money was also spent on Congressional trips to the Northern Mariana Islands to declare their goods are "Made in America". Or the money was spent on Hellfire missiles for unmanned drones over Pakistan. Or it was spent on marijuana eradication programs in California, Mexico and Columbia. Etc. etc. etc.

Please. These little rocks are damned hard to spot, and programs are in place to detect them, as evidenced by this article. Why are you willing to use even the smallest excuse to drag your precious anti-AGW campaign into every thread possible?
CardacianNeverid
2.8 / 5 (5) Jun 30, 2012
Elderly people are dropping like flies.

Good. let them be, they lived their lives. when i am old i don't want to be a burden anyway, my brain would be incapable of properly functioning why would i want to be alive like that? -SatanFucker

Cool. So you'll be volunteering for the Soylent Green program at 60 or so?
SatanLover
1 / 5 (1) Jun 30, 2012
Elderly people are dropping like flies.

Good. let them be, they lived their lives. when i am old i don't want to be a burden anyway, my brain would be incapable of properly functioning why would i want to be alive like that? -SatanFucker

Cool. So you'll be volunteering for the Soylent Green program at 60 or so?


Sure, if i feel like my brain no longer works properly to do any useful work than what am i living for? Just eating and shitting? Who wants to live like that, seriously?

Humans need to get over themselves and understand reality.

Anyway i would think rather 65 i will stop doing useful work, depends on if i will get Alzheimer or not.
CardacianNeverid
2.3 / 5 (3) Jun 30, 2012
Sure, if i feel like my brain no longer works properly to do any useful work than what am i living for? -SatanFucker

But if your brain was no longer working properly then you would not be aware of your deficit and therefore would be in no position to make that judgement.
SatanLover
not rated yet Jun 30, 2012
Sure, if i feel like my brain no longer works properly to do any useful work than what am i living for? -SatanFucker

But if your brain was no longer working properly then you would not be aware of your deficit and therefore would be in no position to make that judgement.

good point, kind of. Dont you think people realize when their life is over? even animals can feel that.
TheGhostofOtto1923
1 / 5 (2) Jun 30, 2012
Sure, if i feel like my brain no longer works properly to do any useful work than what am i living for? -SatanFucker

But if your brain was no longer working properly then you would not be aware of your deficit and therefore would be in no position to make that judgement.

good point, kind of. Dont you think people realize when their life is over? even animals can feel that.
Most brains do not work properly. They start to deteriorate shortly after adolescence because they are simply too large, too complex, too energy-hungry, and too delicate to sustain for very long.

If we do have a built-in self-destruct mechanism it is related to perceived overpopulation. Animals most likely do not self-destruct naturally unless it is to make room for their descendants. Certainly not if there is the chance of making more.
Lex Talonis
1 / 5 (1) Jul 02, 2012
I want to SEE them being used for TARGET PRACTICE.....

The R & D of modding ICBM's well in advance for preimpacting hyper velocity detonations... or leading deep penetrators, and a blast inside the face of the asteroids.

Some of them there rocks are big, and not all of them are giving "generous advance" and there is stuff coming through the galaxy - and not just orbiting the sun....

More news stories

Forecast for Titan: Wild weather could be ahead

(Phys.org) —Saturn's moon Titan might be in for some wild weather as it heads into its spring and summer, if two new models are correct. Scientists think that as the seasons change in Titan's northern hemisphere, ...

Theorists weigh in on where to hunt dark matter

(Phys.org) —Now that it looks like the hunt for the Higgs boson is over, particles of dark matter are at the top of the physics "Most Wanted" list. Dozens of experiments have been searching for them, but ...