Too much information: When does adding mildly favorable details dilute the big message?

Apr 16, 2012

When a large item and a small one are packaged together, consumers often perceive the overall value to be less than that of the large item, according to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research. This applies to information as well as products and gifts.

"People who evaluate a bundle follow an averaging strategy, which leads to less favorable when mildly favorable pieces are added to highly favorable pieces," write authors Kimberlee Weaver (Virginia Tech), Stephen M. Garcia, and Norbert Schwarz (both University of Michigan).

The authors found this "presenter's " across many product domains from bundles of music to hotel advertisements, scholarships, penalty structures, and gifts. For example, presenters who created packages for an MP3 music player chose to spend more money to make the package look more valuable, but to consumers it seemed cheaper. In another study, people perceived a $750 fine for littering to be more severe than a $750 fine plus two hours of community service.

"These between presenter and evaluator perspectives result from their different tasks, which elicit different processing information styles," the authors write. For presenters, more components add value, but evaluators, who tend to average, have a different .

Presenters should be aware of the consumer tendency to average when they're creating product bundles or presenting information. "Whether a public relations expert is deciding which reviews to include on the jacket of a book, a guru at a record label is deciding which songs to include in a music album, or a legal team is building up arguments for a , they all face the important task of deciding what information to include in their presentations," the authors write.

"Fortunately, there is a simple remedy: Taking the perspective of the evaluator and asking yourself how the bundle will appear to someone who averages across its components will alert you to the fact that others will not always share your sense that more is better," the authors conclude.

Explore further: Can new understanding avert tragedy?

More information: Kimberlee Weaver, Stephen M. Garcia, and Norbert Schwarz. "The Presenter's Paradox." Journal of Consumer Research: October 2012.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

The paradox of gift giving: More not better, says new study

Dec 12, 2011

Holiday shoppers, take note. Marketing and psychology researchers have found that in gift giving, bundling together an expensive "big" gift and a smaller "stocking stuffer" reduces the perceived value of the overall package ...

Is it best to withhold favorable information about products?

Oct 21, 2011

Consumers are more likely to choose products when marketers withhold some favorable information until late in the choice process, according to the Journal of Consumer Research. But marketers need to walk a fine line to dis ...

Recommended for you

Can new understanding avert tragedy?

2 hours ago

As a boy growing up in Syracuse, NY, Sol Hsiang ran an experiment for a school project testing whether plants grow better sprinkled with water vs orange juice. Today, 20 years later, he applies complex statistical ...

Creative activities outside work can improve job performance

14 hours ago

Employees who pursue creative activities outside of work may find that these activities boost their performance on the job, according to a new study by San Francisco State University organizational psychologist Kevin Eschleman ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Apr 16, 2012
No. The real reason is a hundred years of marketing which has taught the people that whenever you get extra something on the side, someone's trying to peddle you bull****.

Trying to appeal by looks, or by offering bonus items or any sort of "order now and get a free magazine subscription!" just screams that the seller is desperate and that the product isn't actually worth as much, or there are other strings attached.

There are no gifts in marketing. It's similiar to shops that repeatedly advertise a "50% off sale", when their list prices are double that of what everyone else has. Or market chains that offer membership cards with reductions in prices, where the prices are that much higher in the first place.

Apparently the resulting knee-jerk reaction is spilling over to other things as well. Two for the price of one.

More news stories

Can new understanding avert tragedy?

As a boy growing up in Syracuse, NY, Sol Hsiang ran an experiment for a school project testing whether plants grow better sprinkled with water vs orange juice. Today, 20 years later, he applies complex statistical ...

Crowd-sourcing Britain's Bronze Age

A new joint project by the British Museum and the UCL Institute of Archaeology is seeking online contributions from members of the public to enhance a major British Bronze Age archive and artefact collection.

Roman dig 'transforms understanding' of ancient port

( —Researchers from the universities of Cambridge and Southampton have discovered a new section of the boundary wall of the ancient Roman port of Ostia, proving the city was much larger than previously ...

Net neutrality balancing act

Researchers in Italy, writing in the International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management have demonstrated that net neutrality benefits content creator and consumers without compromising provider innovation nor pr ...