Study reveals gender bias of prospective parents

Dec 19, 2011

A Queen's University study has found that when people think about having children, men want boys and women want girls.

"Gender neutrality - a lack of preference - is now a standard cultural norm embraced within most wealthy like Canada," says Lonnie Aarssen, a Queen's biology professor and co-author of the study. His results, though, reveal a strong , despite the researchers' prediction that they would find evidence of a well-established contemporary culture of gender neutrality.

As a way of explaining these findings, Dr. Aarssen says the results are consistent with the notion that people have a strong intrinsic desire to leave something of themselves behind, a "meme", for the future. "Our results show that men today envision this through sons while women visualize it through daughters."

Historically, Dr. Aarssen says both men and women indicated a strong preference for sons, and this has evolutionary roots connected with the fact that males have a nearly limitless capacity to father future and advance the family line. "Now that women are empowered like never before in history, they are free to anticipate and realize their vision for legacy, expressly through opportunities now more widely available to their own gender," he says.

The study was published in the Open Journal.

Explore further: Why are UK teenagers skipping school?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Is there really a 'mommy' gene in women?

Sep 21, 2007

Basic principles of biology rather than women’s newfound economic independence can explain why fewer of them are getting married and having children, and why the trend may only be temporary, says a Queen’s researcher.

Parents' sexuality influences adoption choices

Apr 03, 2009

A couple's sexual orientation determines whether or not they prefer to adopt a boy or a girl. Gay men are more likely to have a gender preference for their adopted child whereas heterosexual men are the least likely. What's ...

The myth of the 'queen bee': Work and sexism

Jun 20, 2011

Female bosses sometimes have a reputation for not being very nice. Some display what's called "queen bee" behavior, distancing themselves from other women and refusing to help other women as they rise through the ranks. Now, ...

Gender affects perceptions of infidelity

Oct 29, 2008

A new study in the Journal of Marital and Family Therapy explored how men and women perceive online and offline sexual and emotional infidelity. Results show that men felt sexual infidelity was more upsetting and women felt e ...

Recommended for you

Why are UK teenagers skipping school?

Dec 18, 2014

Analysis of the results of a large-scale survey reveals the extent of truancy in English secondary schools and sheds light on the mental health of the country's teens.

Fewer lectures, more group work

Dec 18, 2014

Professor Cees van der Vleuten from Maastricht University is a Visiting Professor at Wits University who believes that learning should be student centred.

How to teach all students to think critically

Dec 18, 2014

All first year students at the University of Technology Sydney could soon be required to take a compulsory maths course in an attempt to give them some numerical thinking skills. ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Deadbolt
1 / 5 (1) Dec 19, 2011
"Historically, Dr. Aarssen says both men and women indicated a strong preference for sons, and this has evolutionary roots connected with the fact that males have a nearly limitless capacity to father future offspring and advance the family line."

I always found that weird. The ability of men to impregnate one woman after another should mean that we're expendable.

You have 1 man and 9 women and you can get 9 babies (assuming no twins) in a 9 month period.

You have 9 men and 1 woman and you have 1 woman pregnant a year, and the males are more likely to kill each other fighting for her too.

Having more women is better for growing the species faster, so it's funny that ancient peoples wanted more sons. They were just creating problems for themselves.
Nanobanano
1 / 5 (1) Dec 19, 2011
Having more women is better for growing the species faster, so it's funny that ancient peoples wanted more sons. They were just creating problems for themselves.


There is a historical, religious reasoning behind that, but you'd need to be pretty familliar with the theology of Judaism and Christianity.

According to historical, traditional interpretation of Genesis 3,15, God promised a MALE redeemer.

So naturally, all of the decendants of "Noah", particularly of the lineage of "Shem," (including both the mid-east and far east,) would have known of this story orally, even if they later branched into different tribes.

Clearly, anyone who believed in this would have wanted THEIR child to be this redeemer, and so naturally, they all wanted sons.

You can even see this elsewhere in the Bible such as in the story of Rachel and Leah, and as well Hannah and Peninah, where they are seen to be "competing" to bear the most sons.
roboferret
not rated yet Dec 20, 2011
There is a historical, religious reasoning behind that, but you'd need to be pretty familliar with the theology of Judaism and Christianity.

I'm very familiar with Christian theology, so its pretty obvious to me that the flood story is a rehashing of bronze age Mesopotamian myths. Geology confirms this.
That aside, folks historically wanted boys because they were financial assets, girls were seen as liabilities.
I think it might just be psychological. We want our kids to be just like us, so men want sons, women want daughters.
rwinners
Dec 28, 2011
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.