Gender discrimination still a factor in modern organizations -- 'that's what she said'

October 8, 2009

The World Economic Forum's Gender Gap Report states, "No country in the world has yet managed to eliminate the gender gap." In the U.S., the Bureau of Labor Statistics cites women working 41 to 44 hours per week earn 84.6% of what men working similar hours earn; women working more than 60 hours per week earn only 78.3% of what men in the same time category earn. The disparity between men and women in the workplace is the subject of a recent study by Elisabeth Kelan, Ph.D., from King's College London.

Dr. Kelan found that workers acknowledge gender discrimination is possible in modern organizations, but at the same time maintain their workplaces to be gender neutral. The author notes, "gender fatigue" as the cause for workers not acknowledging that bias against women can occur. The findings are available in the September issue of the Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, published on behalf of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The study conducted in 2003-2004, included 26 men and women from two information communication technology (ICT) companies based in Switzerland. The companies were given assumed names for this study—"Redtech," a local 50-person Swiss company and "Bluetech," a subsidiary of a multinational enterprise, employing 3000 staff in Switzerland. At Redtech 11 men and 4 women participated in interviews and at Bluetech 6 women and 5 men were interviewed; 16 individuals were also followed on the job for several hours. The interviewees, ranging in age from 24-54, were asked about their views on gender discrimination as well as other issues.

Employees from both companies claimed their organizations were gender neutral and that employees were evaluated based on merit. With further questioning, men and women interviewed could describe past situations where gender bias occurred against women, but limited it to happening 10 to 20 years ago, from contacts outside their own organizations (i.e. customer contacts), or to an isolated male colleague from an "older" generation. "Instead of denying gender discrimination, workers acknowledge it can happen but construct it as singular events that happened in the past, placing the onus on women to overcome such obstacles," stated Dr. Kelan.

Participants in the study displayed, what the author calls, "gender fatigue" where individuals tire of acting upon gender discrimination in spite of the fact that incidents of gender bias either occurred at one time within their organization or could occur again. "The problem with gender fatigue is that it prohibits productive discussion regarding inequalities between men and women, making gender bias difficult to address," noted Dr. Kelan. "Future studies should explore what happens to gender fatigue over time and whether practical strategies can be developed to shape the way in which people in organizations speak about gender."

More information: "Gender Fatigue: The Ideological Dilemma of Neutrality and Discrimination in Organizations." Elisabeth K. Kelan. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences; Published Online: June 18, 2009 (DOI: 10.1002/CJAS.106); Print Issue Date: September 2009.

Source: Wiley (news : web)

Explore further: Gender affects reaction to HIV-prevention materials

Related Stories

Gender affects reaction to HIV-prevention materials

June 10, 2008

Various intervention strategies have been implemented to curb the rise of HIV, and a factor that might affect exposure to interventionsis gender. A new study in the Journal of Applied Social Psychology reviewed the behavior ...

Women Are Sort of More Tentative Than Men, Aren't They?

August 24, 2009

( -- Women hedge, issue disclaimers and ask questions when they communicate, language features that can suggest uncertainty, lack of confidence and low status. But men do the same, according to new research from ...

Recommended for you

New paper answers causation conundrum

November 17, 2017

In a new paper published in a special issue of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, SFI Professor Jessica Flack offers a practical answer to one of the most significant, and most confused questions in evolutionary ...

Chance discovery of forgotten 1960s 'preprint' experiment

November 16, 2017

For years, scientists have complained that it can take months or even years for a scientific discovery to be published, because of the slowness of peer review. To cut through this problem, researchers in physics and mathematics ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Oct 08, 2009
Call me "fatigued," but this really is not an issue any more. The reason women statistically make less money than men is because women statistically occupy less technical and lower paying jobs than men. I don't have any studies, but I can say that where I work (a research & development focused naval base) only 20% or less are women. Many of them are secretaries, PR people, etc. and not a part of the technical workforce. I don't mean to sound sexist, these are simply the facts. Women are paid less not because the boss says "I'll give her 84.6% of the position's pay because she's a woman!", but rather because they simply don't in general occupy higher grade positions in the workforce.
5 / 5 (1) Oct 08, 2009
results can be skewed by experience as well. Of course a man who has been at the company for 5 years will make more than a woman who has been there for 1 year. Also, what if a woman is out on maternity leave? That will reduce her total income.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.