Global carbon emissions reach record 10 billion tons -- threatening 2 degree target
Global carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels have increased by 49 per cent in the last two decades, according to the latest figures by an international team, including researchers at the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia (UEA).
Published today in the journal Nature Climate Change, the new analysis by the Global Carbon Project shows fossil fuel emissions increased by 5.9 per cent in 2010 and by 49 per cent since 1990 the reference year for the Kyoto protocol.
On average, fossil fuel emissions have risen by 3.1 per cent each year between 2000 and 2010 three times the rate of increase during the 1990s. They are projected to continue to increase by 3.1 per cent in 2011.
Total emissions - which combine fossil fuel combustion, cement production, deforestation and other land use emissions - reached 10 billion tonnes of carbon1 in 2010 for the first time. Half of the emissions remained in the atmosphere, where CO2 concentration reached 389.6 parts per million. The remaining emissions were taken up by the ocean and land reservoirs, in approximately equal proportions.
Rebounding from the global financial crisis of 2008-09 when emissions temporarily decreased, last year's high growth was caused by both emerging and developed economies. Rich countries continued to outsource part of their emissions to emerging economies through international trade.
Contributions to global emissions growth in 2010 were largest from China, the United States, India, the Russian Federation and the European Union. Emissions from the trade of goods and services produced in emerging economies but consumed in the West increased from 2.5 per cent of the share of rich countries in 1990 to 16 per cent in 2010.
In the UK, fossil fuel CO2 emissions grew 3.8 per cent in 2010 but were 14 per cent below their 1990 levels. However, emissions from the trade of goods and services grew from 5 per cent of the emissions produced locally in 1990 to 46 per cent in 2010 - overcompensating the reductions in local emissions. Emissions in the UK were 20 per cent above their 1990 levels when emissions from trade are taken into account.
"Global CO2 emissions since 2000 are tracking the high end of the projections used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which far exceed two degrees warming by 2100," said co-author Prof Corinne Le Quéré, director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research and professor at the University of East Anglia. "Yet governments have pledged to keep warming below two degrees to avoid the most dangerous aspects of climate change such as widespread water stress and sea level rise, and increases in extreme climatic events.
"Taking action to reverse current trends is urgent."
Lead author Dr Glen Peters, of the Centre for International Climate and Environmental Research in Norway, said: "Many saw the global financial crisis as an opportunity to move the global economy away from persistent and high emissions growth, but the return to emissions growth in 2010 suggests the opportunity was not exploited."
Co-author Dr Pep Canadell, executive director of the Global Carbon Project, added: "The global financial crisis has helped developed countries meet their production emission commitments as promised in the Kyoto Protocol and Copenhagen Accord, but its impact has been short-lived and pre-existing challenges remain."
More information: 'Rapid growth in CO2 emissions after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis', Nature Climate Change, December 4 2011
Journal reference:
Nature Climate Change
Provided by University of East Anglia
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
22 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
5 hours ago |
3.7 / 5 (3) |
5
|
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
7 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (5) |
19
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
7 hours ago |
4 / 5 (4) |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.1 / 5 (10) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (15) |
41
Stunning image of smallest possible five-ringed structure
Scientists have created and imaged the smallest possible five-ringed structure about 100,000 times thinner than a human hair and you'll probably recognise its shape.
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Scientists develop ultra-sensitive test that detects diseases in their earliest stages
Scientists have developed an ultra-sensitive test that should enable them to detect signs of a disease in its earliest stages, in research published today in the journal Nature Materials.
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (8)
Never quite understood how it can be "cheaper" to make something on the other side of the world and ship it back.
In some cases, we ship cloth to a foreign country so they can cut and sew to make jeans, and then ship it back here.
The cost of transportation is not cheap.
I once calculated the fuel cost of a supertransport ship to be around 7 million dollars per round trip, which is around 150 times more than the wages and salary of the entire crew combined.
This is sick, considering the largest, most modern super transports have engines that are around 50% efficient, bordering on or in some cases exceeding previous theoretical limits...
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
In order to cut back on this insane amount of fuel use and pollution, our cargo ships may need to be converted to nuclear power.
Even if we need to put a squad or a platoon of soldiers on board to prevent pirates or terrorists from stealing the material or technology, it will probably still be cheaper than diesel at some point, and less pollution over all...
Of course, there's wind power, but the problem with wind in modern shipping is each ship only gets to make about half to 1/3rd as many round trips, and crew cost is doubled or tripled per round trip...
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (9)
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 2.9 / 5 (9)
The air temps in the arctic circle in some locations have risen a lot more than that already in the past few decades.
Currently, the water temps in the Southern Ocean are already rising by 0.2C per decade, but the trend is going to be exponential, after all, once you melt all the arctic sea ice and a chunk of Greenland, the Heat of Fusion buffer will be gone, as will a significant chunk of the albedo buffer. Temps will rise that much faster.
Presumably, there will probably be a VEI 6 eruption sometime in the next 90 years, but the last VEI 6 only deflected the Keeling Curve downward by about one or two year's worth of net gains...hardly significant compared to a century...
Looks like we are on the verge of destroying ourselves and saving God the trouble...
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (14)
Whenever doomsday arrives and the world does not end, the doomsday preachers just move the date and preach louder.
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (8)
Actually, people find pieces of the sky all the time. They're called meteoroids.
Ah, perhaps.
There's quite a bit of difference between false prophets as compared to extrapolation of data and trends. I hope you are intellectually honest enough to see that.
wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=1995]
neven1.typepad.com/blog/2011/10/piomas-september-2011-volume-record-lower-still.html
Ya think that exponential downward trend in ice volume for every month of the year might be a TAD worth being concerned about? September 2015, June 2021 meltdowns...
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (33)
Floor 38, and all is fine.
Floor 37, and all is fine.
...
..
.
"Every day, the sky keeps falling. Yet we are not running out of sky, no one has been injured by a piece of sky and we can't find a single piece of fallen sky." - DogTurd
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (8)
Even if correlation implied causation (which it doesnt) surely the complete failure of correlation should be causing some people to rethink their position on CAGW? Unless its a religous thing...
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (4)
Consumers who want to buy pollution-intensive imports should have to pay a stiff tariff, to offset the cost advantage that factories in developing countries get from pollution. The pollution from international shipping should also be factored into the tariff.
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 0.9 / 5 (31)
But in Conservative Economics A B does not equal B A.
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
Is everyone a damn liar?
Didn't they just report that the 13 HOTTEST years on record all occured within the past 15 years?
It's probably still on the first screen on this sub-section.
neven1.typepad.com/blog/2011/10/piomas-september-2011-volume-record-lower-still.html
There's a statistic for ya.
You know how much extra heat it takes to melt an extra 400km^3 of ice? That's 400 trillion liters of water.
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Dec 05, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Dec 05, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
People shouldn't be allowed computer access if they haven't had their meds yet....
Dec 05, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
The PROBLEM is with the PEOPLE themselves who are USING the fossil fuels in their daily lives. They HAVE TO buy gasoline; they HAVE TO heat their homes and use electricity. All these things are part of living, but we are ALL polluting the Earth BECAUSE IT'S A NECESSITY.
I would like to see some SOLUTIONS for a change instead of statistics and climate models that are useless while people polluting still continues.
Dec 05, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
It is the people who can push back climate change if they really care to cut back on energy use. Thermal energy is available from the Earth
Dec 05, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Extinction, really? Don't you think that might be a little overly dramatic? Perhaps it would be more reasonable to suggest that a lot of us might die and that conditions wouldn't be pleasant for most of the rest?
Dec 05, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
But PEOPLE require so much more than what a hamster can provide, so it's not really the energy companies, Capitalism, political systems or any other thing that is to blame. It's just the human race and their requirements. Take away their modern conveniences and comforts and what do you have left? Maybe more bicycle paths?
Dec 05, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
A lot of dead people.
Dec 05, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Do you have any idea how tenuous our existence is should a nuclear war begin? When you speak of conditions not being pleasant for the survivors in an atmosphere just barely able to support life, how unpleasant should it be for infants and children just beginning their lives. Think for a moment, how short-sighted and selfish a statement like you've made really is.
Dec 06, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
http://www.friend...p?id=453
This graph of NASA AMSR-E data shows arctic sea ice is rapidly increasing.
http://www.ijis.i...tent.htm
The U. OF CO and others report that sea level is dropping.
http://wattsupwit...wntrend/
The strength of correlation of temperature changes to solar intensity from 1895 to 2007 is 0.85; to oceanic oscillations from 1895 to 2007, 0.57; to CO2 from 1897 to 2007, 0.43, but to CO2 from 1987 to 2007, only 0.02. Since peaking in 1998, temperatures have declined while CO2 has increased, conflicting with all climate models.
http://wattsupwit...han-co2/
Dec 06, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
http://www.co2sci...tory.php
The IPCC, EPA, NOAA, NASA, DOE, CDIAC, etc. have ascertained the Global Warming Potentials of various atmospheric components. 95% of Global Warming is from water vapor; 5% is from 5 green house gasses (GHG); only 0.28% of GW is from man-made GHG. Only 0.117% of Global Warming is from man-made CO2. Therefore 99.72% of GW is natural.
http://www.geocra...ata.html
IAW the University of Copenhagen research arctic sea ice is twice the extent of 5,000 years ago.
http://www.scienc...1706.htm
Dec 06, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Dec 07, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Dec 07, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
If you don't agree with someone, rather than calling names, why not try paying attention to what was said, and if you disagree, show why you disagree?
Dec 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Assumes facts not in evidence.
There is a distinction with a difference between "name calling" and a characterization based on behavioral traits.
Only within reason. When another engages in sophistry, he forfeits the expectation of substantive rebuttal.
Sufficient time has passed so that those in denial can no longer expect to be treated as simply being ignorant of the facts, but as the intellectually dishonest policy mongers that they are.
Dec 07, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Dec 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Your deliberate misrepresentation of my statements is so very sophomoric as to be laughable.
You'll need to find another willing to play your silly games.
Dec 08, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
How did I misrepresent your statement:
XQZME made some detailed statements in two posts which also contained a total of seven links in support of his statements. Your response?
How can anyone misrepresent name calling with no content whatsoever?
Dec 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
The puppets continue to mindlessly re-ask that which has been asked and answered countless times.
Dec 09, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
I did not miss anything. You have nothing meaningful to say but you enjoy being patronizing and name calling.
Dec 09, 2011
Rank: 0.6 / 5 (28)
http://www.woodfo...00/trend
Where is that cooling trend that you have claimed?
Dec 09, 2011
Rank: 0.6 / 5 (28)
And why does the graphic on their website show a cooling trend for since 2000 when in fact the data plotted above is from the same data set they claimed to have used?
Why all the dishonesty from the tar sands funded propaganda organization "friends of science"?
Dec 09, 2011
Rank: 0.6 / 5 (28)
Here is the real data
http://www.woodfo...00/trend
"This NCDC graph shows U.S. temperatures have declined since 1998." - xqxme
Dec 09, 2011
Rank: 0.6 / 5 (28)
http://wattsupwit...ust1.png
"The U. OF CO and others report that sea level is dropping." - xqzme
Dec 09, 2011
Rank: 0.6 / 5 (28)
http://wattsupwit...pg?w=640
"... temperatures have declined while CO2 has increased" - Xqzme
Dec 09, 2011
Rank: 0.6 / 5 (28)
"Several studies show CO2 increases after warming, not before. " - xqzme
CO2 does not produce changes in the earth's orbit or obliquity. Where those changes have caused climate change, CO2 was by definition not the leading factor in that change.
http://www.youtub...9SNzxJJA
Dec 09, 2011
Rank: 0.6 / 5 (28)
Can you explain your motivation for posting those lies?
Dec 10, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Which leaves only the case that you chose to ignore it.
Dec 10, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Since you said nothing of substance, I could neither miss it nor ignore it.
Dec 10, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
:rolleyes:
You are a hypocritical sophist.
Dec 10, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Let me try to say this in small words. Perhaps you can understand.
You chided me for voting you a "1" when you made the statement:
The above condescending and patronizing statement constitutes all that you have said about XQZME's comments which contained two statements and seven links.
You keep calling me a hypocritical sophist for pointing out that you attack by calling names and have no arguments whatsoever to support any position.
You have nothing to say and your response to everything seems to be name calling.
You are childish. I'll not continue to waste any time responding to your drivel.
Dec 10, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Dec 11, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
http://www.scienc...8.1.full
Dec 11, 2011
Rank: 0.4 / 5 (25)
Extreme Melting On Greenland Ice Sheet - Oct 25, 2011
...
In fact, melting in 2011 was the third most extensive since 1979, lagging behind only 2010 and 2007. The "mass balance," or amount of snow gained minus the snow and ice that melted away, ended up tying last year's record values.
http://www.scienc...3128.htm
"Apparently the Glaciers in greenland have stopped shrinking." - GregorTard
Apparently Gregor is a liar.