With lithium, more is definitely better

November 10, 2011

With lithium, more is definitely better

Enlarge

As more lithium is added (with increasing discharge number in yellow), the plasma light changes from red (from recycling of the deuterium fuel gas) to green (lithium emission from the edge of the plasma) and the overall (recycling) light levels decrease. Credit: Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

A team of scientists working at the U.S. Department of Energy's Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) has found that increasing the amount of lithium coating in the wall of an experimental fusion reactor greatly improves the ability of experimentalists to contain the hot, ionized gas known as plasma. Adding more lithium also enhances certain plasma properties aiding the reaction, the researchers found.

"The lesson here for confining is surprising and simple: When you use more and more , the plasma confinement gets better and better," said Rajesh Maingi, a physicist from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) who is on long-term assignment to PPPL. "This is not what we expected to see. We thought the effect would taper off at some point. But it doesn't. When it comes to plasmas, it's "the more, the merrier.'"

If plasma energy confinement is improved, a fusion reactor can, in principle, be made smaller and, therefore, cheaper. Energy confinement is a measure of how long (in seconds) power that is injected into the plasma stays in the plasma before leaking out to the walls.

Spraying lithium onto the of an experimental fusion device at PPPL known as the National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) improves several other conditions for fusion, the experimenters found. The lithium reduced recycling—the problematic ricocheting of particles into the vessel wall and back into the plasma (Figure 1). Recycling leads to cooling, contamination, and, ultimately, dissipation of the energy of the plasma. In addition to reducing recycling, the lithium coating—and enhanced coatings based on it—also enhanced the reaction by decreasing chaotic instabilities both at the plasma's edge, and also on a larger scale.

The experiment's results indicate that fusion machine designers may be able to reduce the size and the level of heating in future devices designed to use lithium coating technologies.

More information: This work recently appeared in Physical Review Letters 107 (2011) 145004.

The work is being presented at the 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Physical Society Division of Plasma Physics, being held Nov. 14-18, in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Journal reference: Physical Review Letters search and more info website

Provided by American Physical Society

4.7 /5 (7 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Cynical1
Nov 10, 2011

Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
It sure seems like complex things turn out to be easier than first thought...
I can't wait to see what's next...
antialias_physorg
Nov 11, 2011

Rank: 4.8 / 5 (5)
Does the lithium get used up/contaminated? Does the effect degrade over time?

If not then this is really a surprisingly simple (and relatively cheap) way to make things better.

rawa1
Nov 11, 2011

Rank: 1.4 / 5 (11)
Some people are apparently still willing to support the expensive and yet unsuccessful experiments leading to centralized energy sources, while they're ignoring twenty years of successful research of Piantelli and Focardi and the E-Cat technology, which is apparently based on this research.
Scottingham
Nov 11, 2011

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (4)
Fusion is good for one thing: making neutrons.
Fission is good for making energy.

The two go hand in hand in my opinion. Use the fusion to enrich depleted Uranium (versus centrifuges), use fission to get the sweet sweet energy.
antialias_physorg
Nov 11, 2011

Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
Use the fusion to enrich depleted Uranium (versus centrifuges)

Fusion does not 'enrich' Uranium.

Even if you were to create uranium using fusion (something that is not impossible - just very, very hard): The energy you then get out by fission of said uranium is at least as much as you put in in the first place (actually much less because a nuclear reactor only uses a small percentage of the uranium supplied)

There is no such thing as a free lunch.

Using your 'chain' of energy production would be a very bad investment (to use an euphemism for 'colossal waste')
Scottingham
Nov 11, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
I know fusion doesn't...the neutrons produced by the fusion would. I'm fairly certain though that a fissed Uranium atom produces much more energy than it would take to create the isotope that underwent the fission (e=mc^2). Also, once a certain % of Uranium was turned into fissionable material, it could then become self-sustained with an integral fast reactor design.
flashgordon
Nov 11, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I'm sorry I don't have anything more constructive to say other than, "today seems to be fusion energy day!"
epicurious
Nov 11, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
umm, I'm no physicist, but I'm pretty sure plasma physics doesn't really have anything to do with LENR
Some people are apparently still willing to support the expensive and yet unsuccessful experiments leading to centralized energy sources, while they're ignoring twenty years of successful research of Piantelli and Focardi and the E-Cat technology, which is apparently based on this research.

antialias_physorg
Nov 11, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Scottingham: Please take an introductory course to fission. (and also to nucleosynthesis). I don't even know where to begin to explain on how many counts your post is wrong.

... on second thought maybe I do: In every particular respect.
Uzza
Nov 14, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Chaining a fission reactor with a fusion reactor is a good idea if done correctly.
Using normal fission reactors today it would not work because they use solid fuel elements, which causes nonuniform fuel burnup, which leads to needing constant fuel reshuffling.
Engineering the entire plant would also be a very hard job.

Combining the fusion reactor with the principles of Molten Salt Reactors would allow you to combine fission and fusion in a synergistic system much easier, and minimizing wasting the "free" neutrons from the fusion reactor.
Rank 4.7 /5 (7 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?

(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (18) | comments 43 | with audio podcast feature

Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed

(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon – ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (22) | comments 52 | with audio podcast

Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector

Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.

Physics / General Physics

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 4 / 5 (7) | comments 18 | with audio podcast

Hawaii lab turns laser-powered bubbles into microrobots

(Phys.org) -- A team of scientists from the University of Hawaii are working on microrobots created from bubbles of air in a saline solution. The bubbles take on their title of “robots” as a laser ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (4) | comments 2 | with audio podcast weblog

Sound increases the efficiency of boiling

Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology achieved a 17-percent increase in boiling efficiency by using an acoustic field to enhance heat transfer. The acoustic field does this by efficiently removing vapor bubbles ...

Physics / Soft Matter

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 2


Stunning image of smallest possible five-ringed structure

Scientists have created and imaged the smallest possible five-ringed structure – about 100,000 times thinner than a human hair – and you'll probably recognise its shape.

'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study

(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.