Clothing, food and electricity impact most on water footprint

Nov 14, 2011

Australians have been working hard to cut down their household’s daily water consumption, however a new study in the latest edition of Building Research & Information reveals that clothing, food and electricity are the three biggest culprits for a household’s high water usage.

The study’s author, Dr Robert Crawford from the University of Melbourne said people were very aware of using efficient appliances, having shorter showers and not leaving taps running, but the invisible, behind the scenes involved with creating the electricity and other goods and services consumed by our households, was far more significant and alarming. 

“In order to produce any item, from a pair of jeans to a toaster, water is required to obtain raw materials, in the manufacturing process, in transportation and to sell the item. Every item or service purchased by a household has a long line of resources and water usage,” Dr Crawford said.

The indirect, or embodied, water usage of an entire household over 50 years - which includes the construction and maintenance of the house, all belongings, food, clothing and other consumable items, financial services, cars and holidays – is equivalent to filling 54 Olympic swimming pools. This represents 94% of a household’s water footprint.

In contrast, the direct water used by households – for drinking, washing, showering, watering, cooking and cleaning – is equivalent to only 4 Olympic swimming pools, or 6% of the household’s water demand over 50 years.

“We don’t tend to think about the resources that have gone into making the products that we purchase on an everyday basis. The more clothes we buy, the more food we eat, the more water we consume, Dr Crawford said.

“While of course it’s important for households to continue to reduce direct water usage, choosing to buy second hand clothing and furniture, minimizing food wastage and cutting down on electricity use will have a much greater impact on reducing a household’s water footprint. 

“Many people upgrade dishwashers and washing machines to save water, however it is important to also think about the water involved with producing these items. Sometimes this water demand may outweigh the potential water savings.

“Another important aspect in reducing a household’s water footprint, is building smaller and longer-lasting housing. This means we need less furniture to fill them and less energy to run them. 

“A more holistic approach to water conservation is going to be necessary in order to ensure the sustainable use of available water resources within Australian cities.”

Explore further: New estimates on carbon emissions triggered by 300 years of cropland expansion in Northeast China

More information: To read the article, refer to www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10… 09613218.2011.584212

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Tally for violence 'shocking'

Nov 08, 2011

The economic costs for women who leave an abusive partner do not end once they walk out the door. In fact, the ongoing costs in Canada equal a staggering $6.9 billion annually.

Sun sets on oil wells

Nov 10, 2011

Nobel Prize winner George Olah and Surya Prakash of USC Dornsife have found new traction in their methanol economy concept with their latest publication, the Open Fuel Standard Act of 2011 and the new discoveries ...

Treated stormwater safe for growing food

Mar 30, 2011

Treated stormwater is safe to use on your humble household vegetable patch according to a new report by the Center for Water Sensitive Cities at Monash University.

Recommended for you

Rating the planet's oceans

9 hours ago

The most comprehensive assessment conducted by the Ocean Health Index rates the Earth's oceans at 67 out of 100 in overall health. In addition, for the first time, the report assessed the Antarctic and the ...

Feds to unveil cleanup plan for nuke waste dump

12 hours ago

After nearly eight months, the U.S. Department of Energy has formalized a plan for cleaning up the federal government's troubled nuclear waste dump in southeastern New Mexico.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Alex_
not rated yet Nov 14, 2011
this is because being green has been pushed as an end user benifit . as in the case of the dishwasher. people wont care if it took more water to produce it then it will save them directly as the savings end up in there pocket if the cost of the dishwasher is viable