Scientists film hagfish anti-shark slime weapon

Oct 28, 2011
A hagfish showing its teeth.

(PhysOrg.com) -- The hagfish found in New Zealand’s deepest waters is grotesque enough, thanks to its scary protruding teeth straight from a horror film.  Now, scientists have witnessed the full power of its other gruesome feature – a built-in slime weapon to deter predators such as sharks, making it one of the planet’s ultimate survivors.

Researchers from Massey University and Te Papa have just released graphic underwater footage showing for the first time how the primitive hagfish – also known as the snot-eel – defends itself by emitting a choking, gill-clogging slime that might be the envy of any surfer under attack from a shark.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

The footage, part of a study of ’s deep-sea animal diversity, is from special cameras that captured images of various fish attacking hagfish off Three Kings and Great Barrier Islands as they feed on bait attached to the camera.  As soon as it is attacked, the hagfish releases a gooey mucus-like substance from its battery of slime glands and up to 200 slime pores, causing predators to gag before hastily retreating.

“Our video footage in New Zealand waters has proven that hagfish secrete slime at an incredibly fast speed when under attack by predators such as large or bony fishes,” says Te Papa’s Dr Vincent Zintzen, lead scientist of the project.

A paper on the findings just published online in Scientific Reports (Nature Publishing Group) titled Hagfish predatory behaviour and slime defence mechanism describes the effectiveness of the “copious slime” in choking would-be predators without apparently poisoning or killing them. This in turn allows the hagfish to carry on feeding or to make an escape, clearly a success as an evolutionary strategy.

Other new findings include the discovery that the hagfish is not only an ocean scavenger but is also a predator – with a twist. Footage reveals its bizarre method of burrowing into sand in pursuit of a red bandfish by knotting its tail for additional leverage as it grabs its hidden prey before unknotting and emerging from the sand.

Te Papa researcher Carl Struthers with a hagfish.

Professor Marti Anderson, a marine biologist and statistician at Massey’s New Zealand Institute for Advanced Study at Albany, co-authored the study. She says the footage provides clear evidence of how the unique defence mechanism works and also how hagfish exhibit different adaptive feeding strategies.

“Taken together, the findings help to explain why the hagfish, a very primitive fish, has endured successfully for around 300 million years,” she says. Anatomically modern humans have been around for just 200,000 years by comparison.

“We know so very little about the deep sea. Simply dropping cameras into the water at a range of depths in a systematic design not only gives us good quantitative data to model diversity and behaviour, it also has a high probability of finding something new,” says Professor Anderson. “Using underwater video cameras, we can actually see fish in their own environment, which is far more informative than what can be learned from the often bedraggled specimens brought to the surface in research trawls.”

Dr Clive Roberts, co-author and curator of fishes at Te Papa, says the ecological role of the hagfish may be far more diverse than previously considered. “Hagfish, which are quite abundant in the deep sea, were previously observed feeding on carcasses of dead whales, fishes and invertebrates. Our video footage now clearly shows that are also hunters able to prey on live fishes.”

Since 2009, the scientists have deployed cameras at depths ranging from 50 to 1500 metres around New Zealand. So far, over 1000 hours of footage has been collected off the Kermadec Islands, Three Kings Islands, Great Barrier Island, White Island and Kaikoura, with surveys to extend in 2012 to the sea off the Otago Peninsula and down as far as the Auckland Islands.

Explore further: Honey bees sting Texas man about 1,000 times

More information: The open-access article, which includes underwater videos, available through the following link: www.nature.com/srep/index.html

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Hagfish found to eat through its skin

Mar 03, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- A new study in Canada has shown that the primitive fish called the Hagfish, which has the habit of burrowing into dead or dying creatures on the sea bed, eats by absorption through its skin ...

Fish on acid: Hagfish cope with high levels of CO2

Apr 05, 2006

The Pacific Hagfish is a strange animal: it feeds by gnawing its way into a carcass and staying inside to feed for up to 3 days. Scientists at the University of British Columbia (Canada) believe the Hagfish’s gruesome method ...

Keeping an eye on evolution

Dec 03, 2007

University of Queensland research has found the “missing link” in the evolution of the eye.

'Junk DNA' uncovers the nature of our ancient ancestors

Oct 20, 2010

The key to solving one of the great puzzles in evolutionary biology, the origin of vertebrates -- animals with an internal skeleton made of bone -- has been revealed in new research from Dartmouth College ...

Recommended for you

A tiny new species of frog from Brazil with a heroic name

16 hours ago

The Atlantic Forest is a hotspot of biodiversity and one of the most species richness biome of anurans (frogs, tree-frogs, and toads) in the world. However, current levels of diversity might be still underestimated. ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Callippo
1 / 5 (2) Oct 28, 2011
Sharks are especially vulnerable to clogging of their gills with slime, as they cannot breathe without swimming with their mouth open.
antialias_physorg
1 / 5 (1) Oct 28, 2011
Which is true of all vertebrae that use internal gills - not only sharks. They all need to open their mouths and draw in water. Sharks are no more or less vulnerable to this than any other fish.
Jeddy_Mctedder
1 / 5 (3) Oct 28, 2011
this video was AWESOME. thank you.
the predation was pretty surprising but still not as cool looking as seeing fish ten times the mass of the hagfish choking on its slime.
hush1
1 / 5 (2) Oct 29, 2011
The film footage is impressive. Is the slime toxic at all?
And/or open to a synthetic process of manufacture? Why not fill all underwater porous neoprene foam apparel with the slime? Or waist band filled or impregnated swimsuits for bathers and swimmers. This does not prevent the bite. Just a lethal outcome of a predatory act.
And finally, what prevents self-choking?

Kudos to the researchers and research.
Extreme potential for further research and exploitative benefits coming from future research.
Shootist
1 / 5 (3) Oct 29, 2011
Which is true of all vertebrae that use internal gills - not only sharks. They all need to open their mouths and draw in water. Sharks are no more or less vulnerable to this than any other fish.


Yeah, "sharks must swim or drown" is an old canard long disproven.
Callippo
1 / 5 (2) Oct 29, 2011
This theory came about by comparing sharks to bony fish, which have breathing muscles around the gills. Some sharks completely lost the ability to breathe by buccal pumping, and these sharks are known as obligate ram breathers (or obligate ram ventilators). These include the best known sharks, like the great white shark, the mako shark, the salmon shark and the whale shark.