'Junk DNA' uncovers the nature of our ancient ancestors

October 20, 2010, University of Bristol
'Junk DNA' uncovers the nature of our ancient ancestors
The sea lamprey

The key to solving one of the great puzzles in evolutionary biology, the origin of vertebrates -- animals with an internal skeleton made of bone -- has been revealed in new research from Dartmouth College and the University of Bristol.

Vertebrates are the most anatomically and genetically complex of all organisms, but explaining how they achieved this complexity has vexed scientists. The study, published today [20 October] in claims to have solved this scientific riddle by analysing the genomics of primitive living fishes such as sharks and , and their spineless relatives such as sea squirts. 

Alysha Heimberg of Dartmouth College and colleagues studied the family relationships of primitive vertebrates. The team used microRNAs, a class of tiny molecules only recently discovered residing within what has usually been considered 'junk DNA', to show that lampreys and slime eels are distant relatives of jawed vertebrates.

Alysha said: “We learn from our results that lamprey and hagfish are equally related to jawed vertebrates and that hagfish are not representative of a more primitive vertebrate, which suggests that the ancestral vertebrate was more complex than anyone had previously thought.

“Vertebrates have been evolving for hundreds of millions of years but still express the same microRNA genes in the same organs as when they both first appeared.”

The team went on to test the idea that it was these same ‘junk DNA’ genes, microRNAs, which were responsible for the evolution origin of vertebrate anatomical features. They found that the same suite of microRNAs were expressed in the same organs and tissues, in lampreys and mice.

Co-author, Professor Philip Donoghue of the University of Bristol’s School of Earth Sciences, said: “The origin of and the origin of these genes is no coincidence.”

Professor Kevin Peterson of Dartmouth College said: “This study not only points the way to understanding the evolutionary origin of our own lineage, but it also helps us to understand how our own was assembled in deep time.”

Explore further: New piece in the jigsaw puzzle of human origins

Related Stories

New piece in the jigsaw puzzle of human origins

January 15, 2009

In an article in today's Nature, Uppsala researcher Martin Brazeau describes the skull and jaws of a fish that lived about 410 million years ago. The study may give important clues to the origin of jawed vertebrates, and ...

Ancient Chinese lampreys are studied

June 21, 2006

The fossilized remains of two tiny freshwater lampreys have been found in Inner Mongolia, China, each about 125 million years old.

Ancient Jawless Vertebrates Used Novel Immune Responses

December 22, 2005

Researchers recently discovered that the sea lamprey, a modern representative of ancient jawless vertebrates, fights invading pathogens by generating up to 100 trillion unique receptors. These receptors, referred to as VLRs, ...

Recommended for you

After a reset, Сuriosity is operating normally

February 23, 2019

NASA's Curiosity rover is busy making new discoveries on Mars. The rover has been climbing Mount Sharp since 2014 and recently reached a clay region that may offer new clues about the ancient Martian environment's potential ...

Study: With Twitter, race of the messenger matters

February 23, 2019

When NFL player Colin Kaepernick took a knee during the national anthem to protest police brutality and racial injustice, the ensuing debate took traditional and social media by storm. University of Kansas researchers have ...

Solving the jet/cocoon riddle of a gravitational wave event

February 22, 2019

An international research team including astronomers from the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Bonn, Germany, has combined radio telescopes from five continents to prove the existence of a narrow stream of material, ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (13) Oct 21, 2010
Unfortunately the logic is flawed because it is heavily biased.

It is also equally probable that the said Micro RNAs have the exact same function in so-called primitives as it does in man. It is equally valid that it could be a common design feature and not a hereditary trait. The researcher does not explore this option because of his/her predisposition towards evolutionary thinking.

There is just no way of knowing how the skeleton evolved since there's no documentation that shows it evolved. The mystery might be solved for evolutionists because it presents them with a plausible scenario as to how it could have happened and because of that it will become an evolutionary truth - regardless of what actually might be the case [ e.g. a common design feature ].
1 / 5 (12) Oct 21, 2010
Upon delving deeper into the so-called junk DNA, more and more complex functionality and processing will be discovered which will simply thrash this theory. I doubt the evolutionists will retract this bit.
4.6 / 5 (11) Oct 21, 2010
What would it take to convince you, along with all the other creationists, that evolution qua natural/sexual selection occurs on what you call both the micro- and macro- (stupid distinction, by the way) scales? It's extremely obvious that you just *can't* accept evolution for what it is--or at least what other, more educated people accept it as.

If you're unwilling to be convinced why bother posting here? We want profitable, open discussion--not dogmatism like you're probably used to every Sunday morning.
not rated yet Oct 21, 2010
Errr.., Documentation usually comes much later in the story of life as documenters would have to evolve to the point where they can document. And the process of documentation itself evolves as it takes all available paths as can be perceived by different branches of documenters who themselves branch off by branching the process of documentation, creating a positive feedback within their branches thus perpetuating the evolution of their branch.
1 / 5 (1) Nov 12, 2010
Perhaps lampreys and hagfish were 'designed' to appear as relatives to vertebrates. The same way you were designed to seem related to your parents.
Besides, what is the problem with designed things being evolutionary? The computer used here is clearly both designed and evolutionary. There are only slight differences between this computer and a related 1 year older computer. Also between that computer and one 2 years old, and so on to the first digital computer, which had an eerily similar design to the non-digital computers before it. Engineers have just been designing components based on already working devices.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.