Societies with class structure expand faster than egalitarian ones, researchers say
September 26, 2011 By Louis Bergeron
(PhysOrg.com) -- Arguably the worst feature of societies with class structures the disproportionate suffering of the poor may have been the driving force behind the spread of those stratified societies across the globe at the expense of more egalitarian societies. During hard times, a society in which the bulk of the suffering is borne by the poor can survive and expand into new territory more readily than can egalitarian societies.
Why do most cultures have a class structure rich, poor and sometimes middle instead of being egalitarian, with resources shared equally by everyone?
According to Stanford University researchers, it is the very inequities of the class structure that appear to have been behind the spread of those societies and the displacement of more egalitarian cultures during the early era of human civilization.
The researchers used a computer simulation to compare demographic stability and rates of migration for both egalitarian and unequal societies. They found that class structure provided unequal access to resources, thereby contributing a destabilizing effect on the population, and driving migration and the expansion of stratified societies.
"This is the first study to demonstrate a specific mechanism by which stratified societies may have taken over most of the world," said Marcus Feldman, an evolutionary biologist at Stanford. He is a co-author of a research paper on the topic, published online this week by the Public Library of Science in the journal PLoS ONE.
Feldman and his colleagues determined that when resources were consistently scarce, egalitarian societies which shared the deprivation equally throughout the population remained more stable than stratified societies. In stratified societies, the destabilizing effect of unequal sharing of scarce resources gave those societies more incentive to migrate in search of added resources.
In environments where the availability of resources fluctuated from year to year, stratified societies were better able to survive the temporary shortages because the bulk of the deprivation was absorbed by the lower classes, leaving the ruling class and the overall social structure intact. That stability enabled them to expand more readily than egalitarian societies, which weren't able to adapt to changing conditions as quickly.
Many possible causes for the development of socioeconomic inequality have been proposed by scientists, such as a need for hierarchical control over crop irrigation systems, or the compounding of small differences in individual wealth over time through inheritance.
"The fact that unequal societies today vastly outnumber egalitarian societies may not be due to the replacement of the ethic of equality by a more selfish ethic, as originally thought by many researchers," said cultural evolution specialist Deborah Rogers, lead author of the study. "Instead, it appears that the stratified societies simply spread and took over, crowding out the egalitarian populations." The study is a product of her PhD thesis project at Stanford. Feldman was Rogers' adviser.
"This is not just an academic exercise," Rogers said. "Inequalities in socioeconomic status are increasing sharply around the world. Understanding the causes and consequences of inequality and how to reduce it is one of the central challenges of our time."
Provided by
Stanford University
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Consumption rivalry
May 25, 2012
-
Bilateral trade between all countries
May 24, 2012
-
Is the economic foundation of social media in jeopardy?
May 20, 2012
-
Psychology: Rosenthal and Hawthorne Effect
May 15, 2012
-
Is GDP and National Income the Same Thing?
May 13, 2012
-
Difference between hourly wage and real GDP per hour worked?
May 12, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Social Sciences
More news stories
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils
4 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
0
|
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...
Other Sciences / Social Sciences
May 24, 2012 |
4.3 / 5 (16) |
154
Ancient Bethlehem seal unearthed in Jerusalem
Israeli archaeologists have discovered a 2,700-year-old seal that bears the inscription "Bethlehem," the Israel Antiquities Authority announced Wednesday, in what experts believe to be the oldest artifact ...
Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils
May 23, 2012 |
3.5 / 5 (14) |
24
Dollars and sense: Why are some people morally against tax?
As the U.S. presidential election campaigns heat up, the economic debate is dominated by bailouts, austerity and, inevitably, taxation. Now a new study published in Symbolic Interaction asks why tax is such an important issue ...
Other Sciences / Social Sciences
May 23, 2012 |
3 / 5 (2) |
15
Oldest Jewish archaeological evidence on the Iberian Peninsula
German archaeologists of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena found one of the oldest archaeological evidence so far of Jewish Culture on the Iberian Peninsula at an excavation site in the south of Portugal, ...
Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils
May 25, 2012 |
4.2 / 5 (6) |
12
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 3.6 / 5 (9)
You know the answer. You're just afraid of the consequences of political incorrectness.
TANSTAAFL.
"There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch" - Robert A. Heinlein.
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (14)
Why are people differnt?
Why do some want more, and are willing to work for it?
Why do some want to be taken care of?
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (7)
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I imagime the indigenous Australians would fall under egalitarian (their tribes didn't even have chiefs).
But yes, some more examples would have been good...
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (10)
"Reducing inequality", on the other hand, is very very very much like putting a superconducting cable between the poles of a battery; the charges are equalized, the potential difference disappears rapidly, and everything gets mighty cold after a brief flurry of activity.
All efforts at income redistribution, i.e. at "equality of outcome" fail at this point. And at other points too, that I'm not addressing here.
If you want your country's standard of living to rise, the best course of action is NOT a version of Social Security, but rather to maximize the profitability of companies hiring and doing business domestically/locally.
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (6)
If you simplified your model some more it will allow you greater accuracy in bolstering your delusions, see repulsive neutron.
And add some more unnecessary sciency shit you haven't a clue about like superconductors, maybe neutrinos they are in vogue sure to impress the tea-tarder in the next trailer.
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
The opportunity for a society to expand arises from changes in its environment, which can only be exploited by adapting.
Egalitarian societies historically often had a lower standard of living than their neighbors - sharing the misery of enhanced poverty.
Civilization may be defined by the diversity of social roles within a society - the more varied the roles the more advanced the society.
Evolution, including social evolution, requires less-than-optimum conditions to incentivize adaptation.
Following Yakovenko's analogy, people with money are like molecules with energy - thermodynamics demands a non-uniform distribution to achieve stability as a dynamic equilibrium.
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (11)
@Shootist, ryggesogn2, Shelgeyr
I'm pretty sure all of you at one time or another have used the "model" defense to bash climate change and/or dark matter. Care to explain why class structures are different?
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (6)
Otherwise it is just an interesting game.
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
It's true, the rich people are spending and dissipating more money (so they're more radiative like the stars), but most of these clever ones are using their money mainly for further improving their power. They tend to grow into black holes, which cannot dissipate their treasures into outside. We can see it at the example of Arabian leaders (Mubarak, Gaddafi, Ben Ali, etc..).
This is what the free market actually means, because in such market even the power is the subject of market. If you have money, you can buy a virtually unlimited power, which makes the getting of another money a much cheaper issue.
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Because the inside is still the same guy/guys who have the power in redistribution, right?
Egalitarian societies are impossible if for no other reason than man is biased. There is always someone in power.
It isn't an equal who runs the show. It's still the elite in power. Which is why the gap between poor and rich only widens, not shrinks. It eliminates the middle class, for that is who gets the worst end of the deal, or havent you noticed that politicians and CEOs have a tendency to just trade slices of the pie, and nothing trickles down?
A true free market though, ignores race, sex, class, and is only subject to the quality of product and demand associated. Yes, some will succeed more than others, and there is nothing wrong with that. Class structure isn't the problem, it's how we treat it that is the problem.
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Where as the Enterprise is composed of varying races, sexes, classes, yet works together as a whole. There is unity in diversity. There is nothing wrong with being poor, rich, black, white, old, or young.
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Note that, I am not taking issue with the article or research, I am taking issue that we are interpreting the conclusion too broadly.
While North Korea would readily expand if it were allowed to, but that doesn't mean that it serves its citizens better.
I think, as always, the best balance for the society and for its people is managed somewhere in the middle. A place where the lowers have mobility and rights, but also enough inequality to motivate the lowest to work hard and better their lot. A society that survives at the cost all to its lowest members is not a society I want to be a part of. Slavery works like that too you know.
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
egalitarian society that have survived long enough to be know are those in which there is abundance of resources for everyone, little competition for its own sake within, and no competition without.
think about it, without competition, societies would nto have had to innovate.
necessity is the mother of innovation, and there is no necessity so powerful as the will to live either by defeating your enemy, running away, or finding a way to be your enemies slave/servant without being killed.
so war, is the mother of invention. and we all intuitively accept this based on simple facts we all share about ubiquitous technologies we use having been invented by militaries or fighters.
----the internet, nuclear weapons/power, many telecom devices, lasers, rockets, etc.....
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
So, what happens when there is no "new territory" left for the poor to expand into? What's that? They become trapped in a socio-economic cycle of perpetual devaluation, while the wealth accumulates at the top?!
That sounds horrible.
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Actually, the function of government, especially that of the USA, is whatever the people want it to be. And that's why we believe in the right to change that government if we don't think it's working the way we want. If the people want to reduce inequality, then that can be the government's function.
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Govt is not to be changed on a whim. The way to change the govt is via the amendment process in the Constitution.
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
I'm not certain how to interpret that question...
The article opens with:
That's a fairly non-standard definition of "egalitarian", and the opposite of most definitions, i.e. equality of moral worth; equality before the law; just, fair, equitable laws based upon democracy; etc... I'm certainly not arguing in favor of FORCED (i.e. non-mobile) classes, but given economic freedom (which you can't have if aiming for "resources shared equally by everyone"), people historically naturally stratify themselves.
My argument is against government attempting to create a situation where "resources (are) shared equally by everyone", because that doesn't happen naturally.
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
I think you may have me confused with Dr. Manuel, with whom I occasionally converse, and who has always treated me with respect even though I firmly disagree with him regarding "neutron repulsion" - largely because I question the very existence of "neutron stars" as a construct.
If you want to bash me, please feel free but if you don't want to seem like a deranged adolescent then do so accurately.
I'm proudly an "AGW Denier", and (depending on the definition) also an "Electric Universe" proponent - either stance of which is enough to incur plenty of electronic spittle hurled in my direction. But that hardly applies to this article.
Also, please don't embarrass yourself with clueless assumptions regarding my scientific knowledge. For that matter, what do you think would happen to a battery if you bridged its poles with a working superconductor?
Sep 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
By the way, the take away from this article is that we're smarter than that and can eventually come up with better solutions, so that we don't need a layer of poor people to insulate us from disaster. Not that "it's all good 'cause that's the way it is", as I'm sure some poor souls will read it...
Sep 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Sep 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Another thing is, that today it is hardly possible to expand, which makes the tendency to generate critical situations dangerous and negative. Climate change is probably the worst example of this?
More equality in the world is probably necessary to prevent a severe, global crisis.
Sep 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Oct 01, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
What does societal advancement or 'increase' mean? Is the view of technology being the be-all-end-all, is that view incorrect?
Who defines the question, which in turn - frames the answer?
Oct 02, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
ME anyone?
Oct 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I'm not even sure what the "'model' defense" is. The problem I have with modellers of AGW is they claim an accuracy of, at least, 3 significant figures, for the planet's temperature. I don't buy that.
As for class.
Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free. Both for obvious reasons.