Tests show wireless network could jam GPS systems

Jun 11, 2011 By JOELLE TESSLER , AP Technology Writer

New government test results show that a proposed high-speed wireless broadband network being launched by a company called LightSquared could jam GPS systems used for aviation, public safety, military operations and other uses.

The results released this week by a federal working group come amid mounting concern that LightSquared's planned could cripple GPS systems embedded throughout the nation's . And they raise questions about whether the government will allow LightSquared to turn its network on as scheduled next year.

In January the gave LightSquared approval to build a nationwide fourth-generation wireless network that would compete with super-fast systems being rolled out by AT&T and Verizon. The new network will wholesale access to other companies that will rebrand the service under their own names.

The FCC sees the LightSquared network as one part of a broad government push to bring high-speed Internet connections to all Americans. It would cover at least 92 percent of the U.S. by 2015.

But the company's plans have set off alarm bells among GPS equipment makers and the many government agencies and companies that rely on GPS systems, because LightSquared's network would use airwaves right next to those already set aside for GPS. They warn that sensitive satellite receivers - designed to pick up relatively weak signals coming from space - could be overwhelmed when LightSquared starts sending high-powered signals from as many as 40,000 transmitters on the ground.

"LightSquared's network could cause devastating interference to all different kinds of GPS receivers," said Jim Kirkland, vice president and general counsel of Trimble Navigation Ltd., which makes GPS systems.

Faced with these concerns, the FCC has made clear that LightSquared cannot launch its network until the interference problems are resolved. It is requiring the company to participate in a technical working group with GPS manufacturers and users to study the matter. That group conducted GPS interference tests using LightSquared equipment in Las Vegas last month and will report the results to the FCC next week.

The agency will then seek public comments on the matter. In a statement Friday, the FCC said it "will not allow LightSquared's commercial service to proceed if that would cause widespread harmful interference with GPS."

In the meantime, other are coming out.

Results compiled by a working group of the National Executive Committee for Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing - a government organization that advises and coordinates among federal agencies that rely on GPS technology - found potential for widespread GPS interference. The tests showed that wireless signals from LightSquared's planned network interfered with GPS receivers used by the Coast Guard and NASA and caused Federal Administration GPS receivers to stop functioning altogether.

The tests - most of which were conducted by various federal agencies at Holloman Air Force Base and White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico in April - also caused GPS receivers used by New Mexico state police and by fire and ambulance crews to lose reception. In addition, GPS receivers built into farm equipment made by John Deere lost signals, as did most General Motors' OnStar navigation systems.

Last week RTCA, a nonprofit group that advises the FAA, released the results of its own interference tests and found that LightSquared's use of airwaves closest to the GPS spectrum would cause a "complete loss of GPS receiver function" over large metropolitan areas.

Despite the test results released so far, the FCC insists the interference questions are far from settled. "Some of the tests to date may have relied on different assumptions, metrics and mitigation assumptions, and so may not accurately reflect the potential for interference as a result of how the network may be operated," the agency said.

LightSquared executive vice president Jeffrey Carlisle said he remains confident that the company's new network and can co-exist. After all, he noted, findings of interference do not come as a surprise. What matters, he said, is what can be done about the interference.

Among the solutions outlined by the government working group: modifying LightSquared's antenna patterns and reducing the power levels of its base stations; limiting the slices of airwaves that LightSquared can use or moving the company to a different part of the spectrum; and installing better filters on GPS receivers to screen out LightSquared's signals.

GPS makers and users are particularly concerned about the final option since they say it could take many years - and possibly billions of dollars - to upgrade all of the GPS receivers in use.

Explore further: Top US court wrestles with TV, copyright and 'cloud' (Update)

3.6 /5 (5 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

New 4G network could cause widespread GPS dead zones

Feb 23, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- If a plan to build new 4G mobile phone base stations in the US goes ahead, engineers say GPS satellite navigation systems will be seriously jammed and huge areas of the country will become ...

Planned wireless Internet network threatens GPS

Apr 06, 2011

A new, ultra-fast wireless Internet network is threatening to overpower GPS signals across the U.S. and interfere with everything from airplanes to police cars to consumer navigation devices.

LightSquared cleared to offer wireless broadband

Jan 26, 2011

(AP) -- Federal regulators have given a satellite start-up called LightSquared clearance to use its allotted airwaves to provide wireless broadband services that could compete with AT&T and Verizon Wireless.

Best Buy to sell access to new wireless network

Mar 23, 2011

(AP) -- LightSquared, a company that's building a new nationwide wireless broadband network, says Best Buy will resell access to that network, starting with a trial early next year. ...

Recommended for you

Internet TV case: US justices skeptical, concerned

18 hours ago

Grappling with fast-changing technology, U.S. Supreme Court justices debated Tuesday whether they can protect the copyrights of TV broadcasters to the shows they send out without strangling innovations in ...

Hundreds in Mexico protest telecommunications law

19 hours ago

Hundreds of students and activists marched in Mexico's capital Tuesday to protest a telecommunications law being debated by the Senate that they say will allow the government to arbitrarily censor Internet content.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

_etabeta_
3.7 / 5 (3) Jun 11, 2011
I have seen low-cost commercial GPS receivers completely saturated by signals 50 MHz away, even properly filtered high-quality receivers can "swamped out" at 50MHz if the signal source is close enough. There is no way that the extremely weak 1575.2 MHz GPS signal can be received in the vicinity of any LightSquared station, even if extremely narrow band pass filters are used in the GPS antenna & receivers. If the FCC ever authorizes this, it is a clear indication that they don't know what they are doing, or are being influenced in an improper manner.
Nik_2213
not rated yet Jun 11, 2011
Do you wonder that the EU is pushing ahead with their 'Galileo' GPS network ??
ab3a
not rated yet Jun 11, 2011
One of the primary reasons for having a Federal Communications Commission was to assign and coordinate licensing of the radio spectrum. I have personally been burned by the FCC's incompetence back in 1987, when, shortly after assigning us channels on 928.8 MHz for SCADA telemetry, they assigned 929 MHz for paging transmitters.

Our receivers weren't built to take it. We couldn't filter out any of the signal. Had it not been for some very creative antenna engineering (we found a horizontally polarized omnidirectional antenna) and a license modification, there would have been a significant disaster to read about in the news papers.

The problem here is that GPS is in space and it is inaccessible. The receivers have been installed and carefully certified for use in critical applications. Now the FCC has gone and licensed an incompatible system and the rest of the world is left dealing with the fallout.

If this is what they call spectrum management, why does the FCC exist?

More news stories

US urged to drop India WTO case on solar

Environmentalists Wednesday urged the United States to drop plans to haul India to the WTO to open its solar market, saying the action would hurt the fight against climate change.

Is nuclear power the only way to avoid geoengineering?

"I think one can argue that if we were to follow a strong nuclear energy pathway—as well as doing everything else that we can—then we can solve the climate problem without doing geoengineering." So says Tom Wigley, one ...