Ecological impact on Canada's Arctic coastline linked to global climate change
Increases in the Navicula salinarum species at the time of the storm surge show that the lake went from a fresh to a saline-water system. (Highly magnified image: more than 3,000 would fit on the head of a pin.) Credit: Joshua Thienpont, Queen's University
Scientists from Queen's and Carleton universities head a national multidisciplinary research team that has uncovered startling new evidence of the destructive impact of global climate change on North America's largest Arctic delta.
"One of the most ominous threats of global warming today is from rising sea levels, which can cause marine waters to inundate the land," says the team's co-leader, Queen's graduate student Joshua Thienpont. "The threat is especially acute in polar regions, where shrinking sea ice increases the risk of storm surges."
By studying growth rings from coastal shrubs and lake sediments in the Mackenzie Delta region of the Northwest Territories the scene of a widespread and ecologically destructive storm surge in 1999 the researchers have discovered that the impact of these salt-water surges is unprecedented in the 1,000-year history of the lake.
"This had been predicted by all the models and now we have empirical evidence," says team co-leader Michael Pisaric, a geography professor at Carleton. The Inuvialuit, who live in the northwest Arctic, identified that a major surge had occurred in 1999, and assisted with field work.
The researchers studied the impact of salt water flooding on alder bushes along the coastline. More than half of the shrubs sampled were dead within a year of the 1999 surge, while an additional 37 per cent died within five years. A decade after the flood, the soils still contained high concentrations of salt. In addition, sediment core profiles from inland lakes revealed dramatic changes in the aquatic life with a striking shift from fresh to salt-water species following the storm surge.
Dead vegetation killed by the 1999 storm surge is in stark contrast to the vegetation along the edges of waterways that receive regular freshwater (and thus survived the damage). Credit: Trevor Lantz, University of Victoria
"Our findings show this is ecologically unprecedented over the last millennium," says Queen's biology professor and team member John Smol, Canada Research Chair in Environmental Change and winner of the 2004 NSERC Herzberg Gold Medal as Canada's top scientist. "The Arctic is on the front line of climate change. It's a bellwether of things to come: what affects the Arctic eventually will affect us all."
Since nearly all Arctic indigenous communities are coastal, the damage from future surges could also have significant social impacts. The team predicts that sea ice cover, sea levels and the frequency and intensity of storms and marine storm surges will become more variable in the 21st century.
Other members of the team include Trevor Lantz from the University of Victoria, Steven Kokelj from Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Steven Solomon from the Geological Survey of Canada and Queen's undergraduate student Holly Nesbitt. Their findings are published in the prestigious international journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Provided by
Queen's University
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
8 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
22 hours ago |
4.5 / 5 (20) |
2
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
22 hours ago |
5 / 5 (4) |
2
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
22 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
2
Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
22 hours ago |
5 / 5 (6) |
0
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.

May 16, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (8)
-The thousands of consensus scientists were silent when American IPCC funding was pulled.
-If the crisis were real, the thousands of scientists would have been marching in the streets after their warnings of crisis were ignored.
-How is it that there were always countless thousands of consensus scientists out numbering protestors?
-Thousands of consensus scientists also produced cruise missiles, cancer causing chemical cocktails, land mine technology, nuclear weapons, germ warfare, cluster bombs, strip mining technology, Y2K, Y2Kyoto, deep sea drilling technology and now climate control.
May 16, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
May 16, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (8)
We dont agree, however, that man made emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases are having either detectable or predictable effects on climate.
Money is always the route cause of every political decision and usually it's bad for the taxpayer!
(if you drive a car, car;) - Ill tax the street;
(if you try to sit, sit;) - Ill tax your seat;
(if you get too cold, cold;) - Ill tax the heat;
(if you take a walk, walk;) - I'll tax your feet.
And you're working for no one but me.
Taxman!
Should 5% appear to small be thankful I don't tax it all - I'm the taxman!
May 16, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
May 16, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (7)
is there global warming, maybe. is it man made, maybe. is it going to cause catastrophic damage imminently to the whole planet which can be stopped if we all agree to put a LOT OF MONEY in the pockets of people who giving us promises--....the answer the global warming idiots would like you to believe is yes.
it is a new riligious incarnation of an environmental movement that never accepted that environmentalism is largely a failure. man will destroy his environment until he has exhausted it and then many will die off. this is the cycle. global warming is a another scam designed to fleece the gullible without actually helping the 'environment'. you want to help the 'environment'?
May 17, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (5)
May 17, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Former alarmist scientist says Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) based in false science!
At this point, official climate science stopped being a science. In science, empirical evidence always trumps theory, no matter how much you are in love with the theory. If theory and evidence disagree, real scientists scrap the theory. But official climate science ignored the crucial weather balloon evidence, and other subsequent evidence that backs it up, and instead clung to their carbon dioxide theory that just happens to keep them in well-paying jobs with lavish research grants, and gives great political power to their government masters.'
Dr David Evan
http://hotair.com...science/
May 17, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
May 17, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
David.
May 17, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
http://Evilution....eviewed/
Praise the lord!
May 17, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Thanks. David.
May 17, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
There are lots of papers that don't get covered on this site. Sometimes different papers on the same topic do not agree with one another. Sometimes there are differences of opinion between one research group and another on the magnitude of some varialbe. Climate science is a very broad term, actually composed of several different branches of science. There are way too many individual component theories that combine to form "climate science" for me to even begin to name them. There are many areas amongst them where there is still high uncertainty and a great many unexplored, unexplained, unmeasured topics. Even amongst some of the 'concensus' topics there is a high degree of differences of opinion between research groups. Each temperature trend prdiction is different, for example. Opinions about which version of the theory are best are important
May 17, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
predictions made by the majority of climate scientists 20 to 30 years ago are now observed to be false. We've seen the credibility of certain groups and individuals to be questionable. We know that there have been corrupt scientists seeking to make money based on false science in almost any field you can name throughout history. I could give you pages of examples. It is not uncommon for a paper to be retracted from a journal, sometimes temporarily and sometimes permanently. Unfortunately, any time you are working with theoretical science, opinions DO matter because theories always have some amount of uncertainty.
Furthermore, when science is connected to social, political and economic issues it's important to hear different opinions on the meaning/impact/appropriate reaction to the science. What might be a bad thing to you might be good for me, or we might need to pick the least of two evils.
Opinions are never irrelevant, especially in science.
May 19, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
May 19, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
conspiracy nutjob theories?
So, when NASA/GISS, NOAA and CRU each have slightly different estimates for the magnitude of climate sensitivity to a theoretical doubling of CO2, I'm a nut? When each of them predicts a slightly different range of probable outcomes, I'm crazy? They can't disagree and all be right. I think discussion and opinions about which of them is likely to have the best estimate are valid. That's hardly a conspiracy theory. When there are multiple predictions and they do not agee with each other, it's not possible for more than one of them to be right. Heck, if you look at the updates that each of those groups make over time, you can see that it is important to always ask questions and make sure that we are using the best version of the theory. It's okay to improve a theory over time. That isn't evidence of a conspiracy. We learn new stuff all the time. Does that surprise you? The above statement that opinions don't matter is silly.
May 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)