China piracy costs almost million jobs: US study

May 19, 2011 by Shaun Tandon

China piracy costs almost million jobs: US study

Enlarge

File photo Chinese select latest pirated DVDs on sale at a subway in Beijing, 21 August 2007. The United States asked the World Trade Organization to mediate a copyright trade dispute with China, saying bilateral talks have failed to close loopholes that allow counterfeiters to flourish as Chinese-made counterfeit goods -- from software and DVDs to luxury leather goods and watches -- are widely available in the US market. AFP PHOTO/TEH ENG KOON

US firms could support nearly one million more jobs if China stopped intellectual property violations, a study said, leading US lawmakers to call for a tough line with Beijing.

In a report requested by senators, the US International Trade Commission surveyed US businesses and estimated that they lost some $48 billion in 2009 due to infringement of rights by China.

If China raised its enforcement to US levels, the companies could increase employment at home by 923,000 jobs, the survey said. However, the figure includes hiring from other companies, not just new jobs in the sector.

The commission gave an even higher estimate when it relied on a rather than its survey. It said up to 2.1 million jobs could be supported if China cracked down on rampant piracy in areas such as software and movies.

Max Baucus, the chairman of the that sought the study, said China's trade practices were costing the "billions of dollars and millions of jobs."

"We cannot pretend that there aren't real consequences to these violations when these numbers show that millions of American jobs are on the line," said Baucus, a member of President Barack Obama's Democratic Party.

Chart showing the rising number of complaints lodged in the US over suspected pirated goods
Enlarge

Chart showing the rising number of complaints lodged in the US against imported goods suspected of infringing intellectual property rights.

The report was released as trade officials from 21 Asia-Pacific economies met at the Big Sky ski resort in Montana, the home state of Baucus who pressed to host the session of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum.

Baucus hoped that the Big Sky meeting would help to "break down trade barriers and make it cheaper, faster and easier for US small businesses to export to these lucrative markets."

Senator Chuck Grassley, a member of the rival Republican Party, said the study showed the need to seek rigorous protections of when negotiating trade deals.

"China wants the benefits of an economic relationship with the United States but won't hold up its end of the bargain," the Iowa senator said.

The United States and China, the world's two largest economies, have long sparred on trade with a number of US lawmakers accusing the emerging giant of unfairly supporting its industries to fuel exports.

US firms could support nearly one million more jobs if China stopped intellectual property violations, a study said
Enlarge

File photo shows people choosing pirated movies at a park in Beijing. US firms could support nearly one million more jobs if China stopped intellectual property violations, a study said, leading US lawmakers to criticize Beijing's trade practices.

During talks earlier this month in Washington, Vice Premier Wang Qishan rejected suggestions that China's growth came through artificial measures such as a devalued currency and urged the United States not to "politicize" economic relations.

During the talks, the United States said that China promised to improve protection of and also avoid preferences for Chinese businesses in awarding contracts -- another key concern for US firms.

The Obama administration has sought to ease tensions with on a number of fronts. The United States is this week welcoming the chief of China's military for the first time in seven years.

China's piracy is also a problem for other countries' companies. An official study in Beijing recently found that pirated software cost the domestic industry 130.9 billion yuan ($20.1 billion) in 2010.

(c) 2011 AFP

3.4 /5 (5 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

epsi00
May 19, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
When you run out of excuses for loss of jobs and lack of government incentives to create new jobs blame the Chinese But hey it's not the Chinese who stole 90% of American manufacturing jobs...It's corporate America that off-shored them and continue to do so with other categories of jobs ( call centers...)Smoke and mirrors.
bloodyanarch
May 19, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
OK so what it sounds like they are saying is that because of piracy, $48 billion was lost in profits and that of course if
these wonderfull loving companies had those profits they would spend it on creating more jobs? Really.
Modernmystic
May 19, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
So, what I'm hearing you two say is that you advocate criminal behavior...because corporate America is offensive to you. Is that correct?
Shaffer
May 19, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
So, what I'm hearing you two say is that you advocate criminal behavior...because corporate America is offensive to you. Is that correct?


On the nose...count me in...and most of the people I know as well.

Of course, in China, this isn't criminal behavior, it's just business.

If they can't make it fair for the citizens of the country that made it possible for them to thrive, then screw'm.
Modernmystic
May 19, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
On the nose...count me in...and most of the people I know as well.


Good deal just so we're clear, your emotional tenor on corporate America dictates whether or not you'll follow the law.

Of course, in China, this isn't criminal behavior, it's just business.



And if they were lining up people and shooting them? If this could be connected to hurting corporate America would this be acceptable too? Actually that's a rhetorical question since you've already basically admitted that's your worldview.
Shaffer
May 19, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)

And if they were lining up people and shooting them? If this could be connected to hurting corporate America would this be acceptable too? Actually that's a rhetorical question since you've already basically admitted that's your worldview.


Actually this is a conditional question...were they annoying people? You're the mystic, tell me what I would do...
emsquared
May 19, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Yeah, gotta agree with bloodyanarch. The notion 1.) that the pirating of these products, by people who would never have had that software available to them anyway, costs that company anything is patently false, 2.) that, even if a significant fraction of that piracy does actually represent lost profit, it translates directly into jobs on the other side is also patently false. This of course, being the problem with the "job creation" rhetoric that has posessed America. It's fundamentally dishonest.

Purveyors of intellectual property and software have chosen to demand unreasonable prices, punish legal purchasers by belaboring the software with completely useless anti-piracy measures and do nothing but cry instead of changing their business model, or instead of abiding by the principles of economics. I don't have much sympathy.
Modernmystic
May 19, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Actually this is a conditional question...were they annoying people? You're the mystic, tell me what I would do...


One doesn't have to be a mystic, you've already said that you advocate being a criminal because you're morally offended by corporate America. Your exact response was "on the nose". Nothing need be open to interpretation. Or did you wish to further clarify your position?
ereneon
May 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
I'm mostly in agreement with emsquared.

Though the first point about the goods not being available to Chinese people without pirating is partially true, I suspect their total sales would go up (by how much I'm not sure) if all the piracy stopped. Why bother buying the good if you can get it free?

Agreed that more profits do not mean more jobs. Political job creation rhetoric is a misleading way to think of the economy. Why would companies hire more people if they suddenly made more money from China? Would there by any benefit to the company for it? In most cases, I think the answer is no.

Agreed about the foolish business model these companies are using. They are stuck in the last century and refuse to move on. If they offered goods in China for a price adjusted for purchasing power (instead of the US price which is insane by Chinese standards), then they would make a lot more money at almost no additional expense.
rwinners
May 19, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
And if China revalued it currency, more millions of jobs might return to the US. Who's our friend, anyway???
unknownorgin
May 20, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Before the NAFTA agreement started the foriegn product dumping free for all most people had jobs and while not rich they could at least support themselves.
bloodyanarch
May 20, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
No, Modernmystic I think all I was saying is that I dont believe that increased profits translate into more jobs. I don't support Piracy.

I will note that the Music industry has had a huge issue with piracy. It should be noted that although they have fought tooth and nail against any chage, the introduction of a reasonable download system has curtailed piracy (Itunes). Also the Movia media has noted similar effect with the introduction of Net flix.

What does this say? I think it say that if you provide something people want at a reasonable price they will pay for it. If you don't, they will steal it. And yes i do not that somepeople will almost never steal and some people will almost never pay despite a product being resonbly priced or not
paulthebassguy
May 22, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
All of this is irrelevant.

How can they can claim that piracy costs this amount of jobs until they can prove that the people that obtain the pirated versions would have actually bought legitimate versions anyway?

If the pirated versions were unavailable, a lot of these people would have just gone without, so no money would be made in the first place.

Modernmystic
May 23, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
No, Modernmystic I think all I was saying is that I dont believe that increased profits translate into more jobs. I don't support Piracy.


You could have fooled me by your wording, but fair enough. I agree with this much.

...the introduction of a reasonable download system has curtailed piracy (Itunes). Also the Movia media has noted similar effect with the introduction of Net flix.


Indeed, they're trying to hold on to a model akin to the printing press. Legal or not it's doomed to fail. This is no excuse for criminality.

What does this say? I think it say that if you provide something people want at a reasonable price they will pay for it. If you don't, they will steal it. And yes i do not that somepeople will almost never steal and some people will almost never pay despite a product being resonbly priced or not


It's not up to someone else to decide what's a reasonable price for the car you have for sale, and if they don't agree simply steal it.
Rank 3.4 /5 (5 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Technology / Software

created 2 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 2

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

Technology / Hi Tech & Innovation

created 23 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 12 | with audio podcast report

Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study

Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 3.6 / 5 (21) | comments 56 | with audio podcast

HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world

(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the company’s ultimate vision, successfully producing ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (15) | comments 17 | with audio podcast report

Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22

Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (11) | comments 18


Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)

SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.

Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru

Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.

Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision

Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.