Astronomers can tune in to radio auroras to find exoplanets

April 19, 2011

Astronomers can tune in to radio auroras to find exoplanets

Enlarge

Image credit: Boston University and NASA.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Detecting exoplanets that orbit at large distances from their star remains a challenge for planet hunters. Now, scientists at the University of Leicester have shown that emissions from the radio aurora of planets like Jupiter should be detectable by radio telescopes such as LOFAR, which will be completed later this year. Dr Jonathan Nichols will present results at the RAS National Astronomy Meeting in Llandudno, Wales, on Monday 18th April.

"This is the first study to predict the by exoplanetary systems similar to those we find at Jupiter or Saturn. At both , we see radio waves associated with auroras generated by interactions with ionised gas escaping from the volcanic moons, Io and Enceladus. Our study shows that we could detect emissions from radio auroras from Jupiter-like systems orbiting at distances as far out as Pluto," said Nichols.

Of the hundreds of exoplanets that have been detected to date, less than 10% orbit at distances where we find the outer planets in our own Solar System. Most exoplanets have been found by the transit method, which detects a dimming in light as a planet moves in front of a star, or by looking for a wobble as a star is tugged by the gravity of an orbiting planet. With both these techniques, it is easiest to detect planets close in to the star and moving very quickly.

"Jupiter and Saturn take 12 and 30 years respectively to orbit the Sun, so you would have to be incredibly lucky or look for a very long time to spot them by a transit or a wobble," said Dr Nichols.

Astronomers can tune in to radio auroras to find exoplanets
Enlarge

Image credit: University of Leicester, NASA, ESA, Jonathan Nichols.

Dr Nichols examined how the radio emissions for Jupiter-like exoplanets would be affected by the rotation rate of the planet, the rate of plasma outflow from a moon, the orbital distance of the planet and the ultraviolet (UV) brightness of the parent star. He found that, in many scenarios, exoplanets orbiting UV-bright stars between 1 and 50 Astronomical Units (AU) would generate enough radio power to be detectable from Earth. For the brightest and fastest spinning planets, the emissions would be detectable from systems 150 light years away from Earth.

"In our Solar System, we have a stable system with outer gas giants and inner terrestrial planets, like Earth, where life has been able to evolve. Being able to detect Jupiter-like planets may help us find planetary systems like our own, with other planets that are capable of supporting life," said Dr Nichols.

Provided by Royal Astronomical Society search and more info website

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

omatumr
Apr 19, 2011

Rank: 1.2 / 5 (5)
That is great news!

However, planets that orbit at large distances from their star are probably not going to receive enough radiant energy from the star to sustain life.
Going
Apr 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
@omatumr This is about detecting planets not extra terrestrial life.
soulman
Apr 19, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
This is a very good idea. If you can detect gas giants in stable orbits at similar distances to their star as in the Sol system, then these systems could be examined by other (now standard) means for smaller, rocky planets closer to the star's Goldilocks zone.

The idea seems so simple and obvious, it's a wonder it hasn't been proposed before! They should build an instrument capable of doing a whole sky survey.
PinkElephant
Apr 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
smaller, rocky planets closer to the star's Goldilocks zone
I still think we shouldn't ignore the possibility of smaller, rocky satellites of close-orbiting gas giants. No reason at all why such worlds couldn't have life on them (even in our own solar system, we currently have vague suspicions regarding Europa, Ganymede, and Titan.) And there really isn't any good reason why a gas giant satellite can't be as large as Earth, Mars, or Venus, or even larger.
soulman
Apr 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
I still think we shouldn't ignore the possibility of smaller, rocky satellites of close-orbiting gas giants. No reason at all why such worlds couldn't have life on them... And there really isn't any good reason why a gas giant satellite can't be as large as Earth, Mars, or Venus, or even larger.

I wouldn't rule out the possibility, but I think that might prove to be a challenging environment (if we're interested in finding habitable worlds). There would be significant tidal effects on such a world and it might even be tidally locked. Then it would have to contend with a high radiation environment and it might be regularly bombarded with meteorites that are attracted by the gas giant. Also the gas giant would tend to swamp the signal from a terrestrial moon, making it even harder to detect.

So, while I wouldn't rule out such a configuration, I still think a single orbiting rocky planet would be a much better bet.
PinkElephant
Apr 19, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
There would be significant tidal effects on such a world and it might even be tidally locked.
True. However, the same tidal effects would keep it warm and geologically active -- the latter being a prerequisite for life, IMHO. Plus, even a tidally locked gas giant satellite still exposes all sides of itself to the star. Though this may make its "day" longer than that on Earth, still it's not necessarily a deal-breaker.
Then it would have to contend with a high radiation environment
Again, not necessarily. The gas giant's own magnetic field would shield its satellites from the solar radiation. And the degree to which the satellite is exposed to the gas giant's radiation belts, depends on where its orbit lies. Lastly, if the satellite has any appreciable atmosphere (like Titan, for instance), its surface would be effectively shielded from any radiation (never mind its subsurface or any potential oceans...)
PinkElephant
Apr 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
it might be regularly bombarded with meteorites that are attracted by the gas giant
That's true. However, closer to the star there may be fewer meteorites (particularly if the solar system is a mature one.) But still, that's probably the biggest danger. Yet, if there are other gas giants in the solar system, farther away form the star, then they might vacuum up any meteorites before they get closer in.
the gas giant would tend to swamp the signal from a terrestrial moon, making it even harder to detect
True. Yet, if we could detect terrestrial planets orbiting closer to the star (e.g. using long-baseline interferometers), then we should be able to detect large satellites orbiting gas giants (the difference in brightness between them vs. the gas giant, is dwarfed by the difference between them vs. the star.)
WarRoom
Apr 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
"For the brightest stars and fastest spinning planets, the emissions would be detectable from systems 150 light years away from Earth"

That's probably not going to mean too many planets are found this way but it makes sense that there would be other ways to find Jupiter like planets, after all they're almost Suns in their own right.
soulman
Apr 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
"For the brightest stars and fastest spinning planets, the emissions would be detectable from systems 150 light years away from Earth"

That's probably not going to mean too many planets are found this way but it makes sense that there would be other ways to find Jupiter like planets, after all they're almost Suns in their own right.

I assume that estimate was based on currently available detectors. Once the square kilometer array gets built, that range could be pushed out significantly (if the ska can be used for this purpose).
quasi44
Apr 20, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Even laying out potential sites for further examination by Kepler would be highly significant, and being the case that certain orbits are beyond Kepler's POV capability, any increase in that arena could well be the difference in finding the 'perfect' planet. Just to find more suns that have planets at all more than proves the worth of this effort.
Callmewhatuwant
Apr 22, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
hahaha...!! another way out!!
Rank 5 /5 (6 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • revamping general concept and cosmological principle
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Math behind Theoretical Physics
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Structure of the Milky Way?
    createdMay 20, 2012
  • What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
    createdMay 19, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)

SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 19 hours ago | popularity 4.5 / 5 (20) | comments 0

Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit

Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.

Space & Earth / Astronomy

created 19 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 2

Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision

Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.

Space & Earth / Astronomy

created 19 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (4) | comments 1

Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship

(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 19 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 0

Sophisticated simulations predict future warming

The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (9) | comments 51


Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru

Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.

Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend

(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.

Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity

(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...