Physicists demonstrate conditions for laser-driven fusion
March 15, 2011 by Lisa Zyga
A mock-up of the gold-plated hohlraum used in inertial confinement fusion experiments at the National Ignition Facility. Image credit: NIF.
(PhysOrg.com) -- Currently, commercial nuclear power plants generate electricity using nuclear fission, in which an atoms nucleus is split into lighter nuclei. But scientists are also researching the reverse reaction, nuclear fusion, in which two light atomic nuclei fuse to form a single heavier nucleus. Compared with fission, fusion has the potential to produce less radioactive waste while still generating large amounts of energy.
So far, scientists have not yet been able to produce nuclear fusion on a large commercial scale. But two new studies published in Physical Review Letters by scientists at the National Ignition Facility (NIF), which officially opened last year at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, California, have produced some promising results.
The scientists are developing inertial confinement fusion (ICF), a type of fusion in which high-energy lasers heat and compress an inch-long gold fuel pellet called a hohlraum that contains the hydrogen isotope nuclei to be fused. The goal of ICF reactions is to achieve ignition, where the fusion reactions generate enough heat to be self-sustaining. The scientists hope that the fusion reactions inside the fuel pellets will generate 10-20 times more energy than that provided by the lasers that start the reactions.
In their recent experiments, the scientists at the NIF have achieved two of the most important components of ignition: extremely high Sun-like temperatures and uniform compression so that the targets dont lose their shape. In the current experiments, the scientists used two-millimeter-diameter plastic spheres as the targets instead of hohlraums because they were easier to analyze.
The experiment involved focusing 192 laser beams onto the plastic spheres, each of which contained helium. The lasers generated large amounts of heat energy that was converted to X-rays with nearly 90% efficiency, and produced temperatures of up to 3.6 million degrees Celsius (300 eV). At these temperatures, the diameters of the two-millimeter spheres shrunk to about one-tenth of a millimeter.
While these conditions look promising, true ignition will involve some different components. Instead of helium, the fuel pellets will contain the element beryllium, which itself will contain the hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium. The laser-generated X-rays will cause the beryllium to explode, producing a reactive inward implosion that sends shockwaves into the hydrogen isotopes. The shockwaves further increase the temperature of the deuterium and tritium nuclei to the point where they can overcome their mutual repulsion and fuse.
The current experiments have simulated the conditions for such a reaction to occur in a more realistic way that any previous experiment. However, the researchers plan to take small steps toward the final goal of ignition. Theyre currently testing spheres that contain unequal quantities of deuterium and tritium in order to investigate the possibility of asymmetric implosions.
Edward Moses, Associate Director of the NIF, hopes that the facility will demonstrate actual ignition in the spring or summer of 2012. However, he cautions that technical and scientific setbacks could interfere with the timeline. For instance, last January, Moses and others at the NIF had hoped to demonstrate ignition by the end of 2010.
More information: J. L. Kline, et al. "Observation of High Soft X-Ray Drive in Large-Scale Hohlraums at the National Ignition Facility." Physical Review Letters 106, 085003.
S. H. Glenzer, et al. "Demonstration of Ignition Radiation Temperatures in Indirect-Drive Inertial Confinement Fusion Hohlraums." Physical Review Letters 106, 085004.
via: Physics World
© 2010 PhysOrg.com
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
Question about induced E field.
37 minutes ago
-
Charging a capacitor in a tesla coil
38 minutes ago
-
Water Rocket
4 hours ago
-
why do trucks have bigger brakes?
8 hours ago
-
Solar Sail Physics - Do they work on a large scale?
9 hours ago
-
How should I switch an air conditioner off?
9 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (20) |
46
|
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector
Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
May 23, 2012 |
4 / 5 (7) |
15
|
Hall effect at the speed of light: How can you demonstrate relativistic effects with your mobile phone?
The relativistic Hall effect describing objects rotating at speeds comparable with the speed of light has been reported.
May 21, 2012 |
4.3 / 5 (3) |
8
Cloak of invisibility: Engineers use plasmonics to create an invisible photodetector
A team of engineers at Stanford and the University of Pennsylvania has for the first time used "plasmonic cloaking" to create a device that can see without being seen - an invisible machine that detects light. It is the first ...
May 21, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (16) |
7
|
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Mar 15, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (11)
Mar 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
"man, thats the stupid way to do it. I know of a better way but I am going to keep my mouth shut until one of the Ph.d's that have written papers and studied their whole lives , decide to come and ask me how I would do it."
So, my friend -- why is this impractical???
-------------------------
I am glad the effort to increase science in this field is continuing to improve. - But it is counter intuitive that heating something to 3M Celcius would made the volume shrink -- there must be a heck of a lot of pressure being exerted on the target in the process of heating it.
Mar 15, 2011
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (6)
Mar 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (7)
Mar 15, 2011
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (5)
Let's say one shot produces enough juice to run a mid sized city for a day. Fire off about 5 a day and you've produced enough energy to store and locally transmit for a week, no fear of fallout, no fear of pollutants, no fear of anything short of storage of said energy.
Once you determine a reasonable capture and storage medium you've won a pretty big piece of the game.
Mar 15, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
While i cannot speak fully on whether the ignition of this reaction is long lived or not, the wording of every article i have read on the subject tends to lean on the side of we are starting a reaction that will continue until the fuel is spent.. and then we start another reaction with another piece of fuel.
I believe, and i could be wrong, but I think the goal of NIF is to create an initial reaction that produces enough heat that the process coninues..
It is up to another country to tackle creating a fuel that 'lasts' a really long time.
i will look for a coutry listing of goals
Mar 15, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Mar 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (7)
The ICF process is substantially different from tokamak fusion experiments, and the NIF goal (one of several...) is to research a design and implementation for a stand-alone fusion power generator. It's unrelated to the ITER project.
The reaction is not intended to be long-lived-- detonation and complete burn of all the fuel occurs on a scale of nanoseconds, after which the capsule is spent, and you need to load a new capsule in.
No matter how successful the experiments at the NIF are, that particular equipment will never be a power station because the replacement of fuel pellets requires many hours. In order for that to happen, an automated fuel pellet reloading system will have to be made, to allow for detonation to occur once every few seconds (as well as the added ability for the lasers and optics to survive such repeated use, which they current cannot).
Mar 15, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (4)
Mar 15, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
I see laser fusion as either the core of a beam weapon or, like I said, as a form of propulsion. Something like this:
http
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Daedalus
Mar 15, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
http
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Longshot
Mar 15, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
Mar 15, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
@Skeptic_Heretic
Would a kinetic storage device be applicable? IE, some massive rotating object storing energy and releasing it by running generators when needed? I know there would be loss of energy due to the efficiency of the generators but would it be even remotely possible?
Mar 16, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (2)
The whole laser/ feul pellet idea has been tried for at least a decade and the money spent on fusion research could have put working technology in place to cut back foriegn oil dependance.
Mar 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
What they have there is literally a tiny hydrogen bomb being detonated every second or twice a second, however many you need to produce some average power. I would like to see the structure that can withstand a million of those. With the kind of repeated stress to create, say 1 GW power on average from a series of nuclear explosions, any structure that I can think of would turn to dust.
Mar 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
But if you increase the pressure enough, or use an unsuitable fuel, the mixture in the cylinder doesn't follow a chain reaction anymore. It lights up spontaneously everywhere and that makes the pressure build-up faster than the speed of sound - a shockwave - an explosion that puts immense stress on the parts until the cylinder or the cylinder head, or the piston, or anything subjected to the battering just gives up and fractures after a number of repeated explosions.
Running on explosions instead of combustion would make the engine incredibly efficient, but there's simply no material that can withstand it for a long time. That's why the guncotton engine failed as well.
And now they're trying it with h-bombs.
Mar 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Mar 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Mar 20, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
They are getting pretty close to this though, an engine without as many moving parts and works with shockwaves:
http://www.physor...deo.html
Mar 20, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Mar 21, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Just like a fission reactor, the energy will be thermal. You collect and store the energy with heat sinks and a liquid salt. Then you use the heated salt to boil water at a controlled rate and drive standard steam turbines. The setup should be quite similar to existing nuclear power plants. If the heat comes in pulses then you just use pressure dampers. The reverse of an aircraft carrier steam catapult or the damping system on a 20 inch gun for example. That way the pressure/temperature of the pulse is mechanically conserved in the system. You could do it with just a few moving parts, just like a standard nuclear plant.
Mar 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Mar 24, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
The method of using a heated liquid salt to store the energy is super-efficient except that the salts tend to be really corrosive, especially at high temperatures, so it's a little rough on maintenance of valves, seals and such. The newest generation of steam turbines and live steam handling methods have come from nearly 100 years of experience and it is an extremely mature technology. The infrastructure to supply replacement parts and to supply educated people to run them is very established. That greatly lowers the final cost to operate. If you could find a technology that is a little more efficient then you still have to face the barriers of getting a new technology established well enough that the final costs (including all the logistical and technical support costs) do not cost more than what you gain from effiency. Lots of people don't understand that the "best" technology on paper isn't always the same as the most economical in the real world.
Mar 24, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Digital cameras have completely replaced film cameras and now excede film in performance and cost by far. It has become mature.
Flat panel display is still in flux. The cost is still a bit high, and standards have not become firm yet (eg: plasma vs LED).
Compact flourescent lightbulbs are still in the early stages of the cycle and may never make it to the end. They cost too much and LED lighting seems to be on the path to preempt them.
Any new energy tech (solar, tidal, fusion) must get over this learning curve/product developement cycle. The more radical a tech, the steeper the curve. That partially explains why you sometimes see a way people could improve something (a car for example) but for some seemingly inexplicable reason, the lunkheads in charge won't do it. In the big picture, they aren't really lunkheads. They do the math and figure out the total cost to market and sometimes it just doesn't add up for them. It's about making a profit.
Mar 24, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Mar 24, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
I guess as someone who can see all these amazing new discoveries coming about and with a lack of "real life" experience (as I am still a student) you tend to forget about all that other stuff, mainly everything to do with production lol.
That's one of the reasons I have gone into chemistry as relatively small changes in production, IE., small chemical changes, can make a great difference. That and I want to go into space by elevator, but one has to have dreams!
Thanks for the informative replies!