Global standards for preventing money laundering and terrorism financing have come under heat after substantial evidence has shown they do not work.
The problem, Case Western Reserve financial law expert Richard K. Gordon says, is that the private sector-mostly in the form of financial institutions-is required to monitor transactions and report to the government those that raise suspicion.
However, the individuals responsible for such monitoring don't have sufficient expertise, access to data or incentives to do so effectively. Law enforcement, on the other hand, doesn't have enough responsibility in identifying suspected cases of money laundering or terrorism financing.
"Dividing these tasks between the private sector and law enforcement is inherently inefficient," Gordon says. "It separates expertise and data, making it difficult and unlikely to effectively identify possible criminals."
Explore further: High finance, high anxiety
More information: Gordon will outline the problems with current preventive measures and offer suggestions for change in the March 2011 issue of the Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law.