Big pay gap still remains between sexes

September 10, 2010

The pay gap between the sexes grows substantially over the first ten years of a woman’s career, new research has shown.

Dr. Leen Vandecasteele from The University of Manchester found that though educational opportunities nowadays give men and women an equal start, the effect is often lost when women’s childcare responsibilities kick in.

The blames the disparity on years spent away from the and working in occupations which employ mainly women - such as cleaning or nursing.

She presented her findings yesterday at the British Sociological Association conference on Work, Employment and Society in Brighton.

The researcher used survey data and developed graphs from more than 5,000 households to compare two cohorts in their early career, starting in 1991 and 2000 respectively.

She found that women in their early career earned on average 18% less than men in 1991, while this difference was down to 5% for the 2000 cohort.

Her analysis of the data, she said, showed the gender wage gap has largely disappeared for women at the start of their careers.

However, following the cohorts over their careers, she found that by the eighth year of observation, the more recent cohort suffered a pay gap of 24%, almost catching up with the 27% figure for the earlier group.

The more recent cohort had higher education levels than the earlier cohort while their children were born substantially later. This, she says, could explain the more equal start in wages.

Dr Leen Vandecasteele is based at the University’s Cathie Marsh Centre for Census and Survey Research.

She said: “The research confirms that progress has already been made towards the equalization of the wages of men and - at the very start of their career.

“But while the younger generation of British labour market entrants enjoy larger gender equality in educational opportunities and initial wages, this does not persist over their career.”

She added: “Policy makers should realise that a focus on education alone will not eliminate the gender wage gap.

“It is more important to work on the negative wage consequences of years spent away from the labour market and the gender segregation of occupations.”

Explore further: Changes in work force, not pay, narrowing the gender wage gap

More information: Data was used from British Household Panel Survey. The BHPS is a socio-economic household panel that started with a sample of more than 5000 households in 1991.

Related Stories

Changes in work force, not pay, narrowing the gender wage gap

August 12, 2008

The apparent narrowing of the wage gap between working men and women in the last 30 years reflects changes in the type of women in the workforce, rather than in how much they're being paid, according to groundbreaking new ...

Gender roles and not gender bias hold back women scientists

November 19, 2007

Traditional roles of women in the home and a negative bias in workplace support result in less career success for women versus men at the same stage of their research careers, determined researchers at the European Molecular ...

Long work hours widen the gender gap

August 1, 2008

Working overtime has a disproportionate impact on women in dual-earner households, exacerbating gender inequality and supporting the "separate sphere" phenomenon in which men are the breadwinners while women tend to the home, ...

Science pay gap: gender discrimination?

September 5, 2006

A British study suggests discrimination plays a significant role in the pay gap between men and women scientists working in British universities.

Recommended for you

Amber specimen offers rare glimpse of feathered dinosaur tail

December 8, 2016

Researchers have discovered a dinosaur tail complete with its feathers trapped in a piece of amber. The finding reported in Current Biology on December 8 helps to fill in details of the dinosaurs' feather structure and evolution, ...

Scheduling leisure activities makes them less fun: study

December 8, 2016

Nothing ruins a potentially fun event like putting it on your calendar. In a series of studies, researchers found that scheduling a leisure activity like seeing a movie or taking a coffee break led people to anticipate less ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4 / 5 (2) Sep 10, 2010
The system appears to be working as planned. In fact, it would offend sensibilities if someone got paid the same for having less experience. The gender segregation seems to be a self-inflicted wound. Take nursing for example: hospitals want female nurses because they're more flexible. Both men and women want female nurses over male nurses, and many hospitals have policies where a man can't touch a naked woman unless he's a doctor. In light of this, is it any surprise that women have a comparative advantage (and thus gravitate there)?
1 / 5 (1) Sep 10, 2010
Grievance research. Women in the US make virtually the same as men, if they are childless. Their real grievance is with biology. Sue God.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.