The world's fastest supersonic car's lift problem fixed

March 22, 2010

Engineers designing the world's fastest car believe they have found a solution to stop the car taking-off.

EPSRC funded research is helping Bloodhound SSC to smash the 1,000 mph barrier.

Previous design iterations had produced dangerous amounts of lift meaning the car would literally take-off.

The latest modelling work indicates these problems have now been fixed allowing the Bloodhound team to push ahead with other design areas.

To claim the world land speed record, Bloodhound will have to better the mark of 763mph (1,228km/h) set by the Thrust SuperSonic in 1997. It will be powered by a combination of a hybrid rocket and a jet engine from a Eurofighter-Typhoon.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

They plan to mount their assault on the record in late 2011, driving across a dried up lakebed known as Hakskeen Pan, in the Northern Cape of South Africa.

Explore further: Faster Than a Speeding Bullet: Guinness Recognizes NASA Scramjet

Related Stories

Car Buyers Say Silence Isn't Golden

July 12, 2005

The technology improvements that are giving us ever quieter cars are not proving popular with many car drivers. Car manufacturers now want to restore to the inside of a car the sounds their customers want to hear while preserving ...

The technology to make 'Speed Racer' cars

May 1, 2008

The opening of the new “Speed Racer” movie coming out nationally on May 9 has meant weeks of fast-paced fun for 8 juniors in the University of Cincinnati’s internationally recognized School of Design, part of UC’s ...

Scientists unveil chocolate-fueled race car

May 5, 2009

(AP) -- Scientists unveiled on Tuesday what they hope will be one of the world's fastest biofuel vehicles, powered by waste from chocolate factories and made partly from plant fibers.

300 mph: New Land Speed Record for a Hydrogen Powered Vehicle

September 28, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- One of the complaints that many have with regard to vehicles powered by alternative energy is the fact that they don't really have a lot of speed. However, this does not necessarily have to be the case. Last ...

Design chosen for British 1,000 mph car (w/ Video)

November 25, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- A British team hoping to be the first to get a car to 1,000 mph (1,610 km/h) has made its final design selection. The six-tonne car, known as the Bloodhound, will be powered by a Eurofighter jet engine mounted ...

Recommended for you

Power grid forecasting tool reduces costly errors

July 30, 2015

Accurately forecasting future electricity needs is tricky, with sudden weather changes and other variables impacting projections minute by minute. Errors can have grave repercussions, from blackouts to high market costs. ...

6 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jerryd
1 / 5 (2) Mar 22, 2010
Dropping the nose and narrowing the body in front would help a lot.
Temple
5 / 5 (1) Mar 23, 2010
Dropping the nose and narrowing the body in front would help a lot.


Yeah, because you know better about the aerodynamic properties of that vehicle than they do.

--

The unasked question is: why are they doing this?

"Smash the 1,000MPH barrier" Oh please. There's no such barrier. Imagine if all the money and energy spent keeping a jet touching the earth while going faster and faster (really that's all it is), were spent on smashing the 1,000MPG 'barrier'.
VOR
4 / 5 (1) Mar 23, 2010
I'd guess that there's little research value. If any of the designs and tech solutions have any, that would be interesting. Too bad the article doesnt go into such detail.
jonnyboy
2.3 / 5 (3) Mar 23, 2010
ATTENTION AGW "researchers"..............This shows how modeling is supposed to be done, first you model and then you PROVE that your model isn't worthless, it's not enough to create a model, you need to prove that it is right.
CarolinaScotsman
not rated yet Mar 28, 2010
Uh..way back in the 1960s, Art Arfons put a wing on his jet powered "Green Monster" world land speed record car to produce down force and keep it from going airborn. So what's so difficult about doing that?
Skeptic_Heretic
not rated yet Mar 28, 2010
I'd guess that there's little research value. If any of the designs and tech solutions have any, that would be interesting. Too bad the article doesnt go into such detail.

The aerodynamics research alone is going to bring us forward in rail and road technology by years if not decades otherwise.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.