Professional lobbyists: Pragmatic operatives or just another partisan resource?

July 20, 2009

The thousands of professional lobbyists working in Washington, DC on issues tend to be professional partisans who mobilize resources for one preferred political party exclusively. So finds a new study which counters the common expectation that lobbyists play both sides of the political field regardless of which party is in the ascendancy.

The research is presented in an article authored by political scientists Gregory Koger (University of Miami) and Jennifer Nicoll Victor (University of Pittsburgh) that is entitled "Polarized Agents: Campaign Contributions by Lobbyists" and which appears in the July issue of PS: & Politics, a journal of the American Political Science Association. The article is available in its entirety online at

"Although many lobbyists have backgrounds in partisan politics," note the authors, "they may have incentives to give money to candidates from both parties. This article finds that professional lobbyists tend to make personal contributions to their preferred party exclusively." Moreover, the extent of partisanship among lobbyists is somewhat surprising as "while our stereotypes (and prior research) of lobbyists do not preclude partisan loyalties, they do not predict partisanship either."

Koger and Victor gauged the partisan leanings of over 1,200 lobbyists in Washington, DC by measuring how they allocated more than 20,000 campaign donations between Republican and Democratic politicians during the 2006 election cycle. They assessed the results across three major dimensions: donations to Democratic candidates, organizations, or PACs; donations to incumbent members of Congress; and donations by lobbying firms.

The authors found that "the donation behavior of individual lobbyists appears to be quite partisan," with about 29% of all lobbyists giving almost nothing to Democrats while another 28% gave almost nothing to Republicans. Similarly, when it came to incumbent members of Congress "about 43% of lobbyists who made five or more donations gave 95% or more of their money to Republican members, with an equal proportion loyal to Democratic members." Only 6.3% of lobbyists gave at least 40% of their donations to both parties. Finally, while lobbying firms appear more balanced in their donations and employ both Republicans and Democrats, over 40% of firms were found to employ a set of lobbyists who give 90-100% to one party or another.

"Lobbyists are often depicted as the ultimate insiders of the Washington 'game' [but]…we have found a pattern of stark polarization in lobbyists' donations, observe Koger and Victor. They conclude by noting that "the broader implication is that lobbyists do not shed their partisan loyalties when they hang up their shingles," and in the post-Abramoff era, "it is easy to see why politicians take a great interest in who is hired to talk to them, since they clearly see as resources for one party or another."

Source: American Political Science Association

Explore further: Support grows for McDowell FCC nomination

Related Stories

Support grows for McDowell FCC nomination

January 25, 2006

Support for the nomination of telecom lobbyist Robert McDowell for the Federal Communications Commission seemed to be solidifying in Washington Wednesday.

Why New Political Parties Sizzle or Fizzle

August 4, 2008

( -- Across the globe, new political parties, from green parties to anti-immigration parties, are constantly emerging in democratic countries. But while some of these nascent single-issue groups fade away, others, ...

Recommended for you

Biologists trace how human innovation impacts tool evolution

November 24, 2015

Many animals exhibit learned behaviors, but humans are unique in their capacity to build on existing knowledge to make new innovations. Understanding the patterns of how new generations of tools emerged in prehistoric societies, ...

First Londoners were multi-ethnic mix: museum

November 23, 2015

A DNA analysis of four ancient Roman skeletons found in London shows the first inhabitants of the city were a multi-ethnic mix similar to contemporary Londoners, the Museum of London said on Monday.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.