This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


peer-reviewed publication

trusted source


Small-scale study finds microplastics from natural fertilizers are blowing in the wind more often than once thought

Small-scale study finds microplastics from natural fertilizers are blowing in the wind more often than once thought
Graphical abstract. Credit: Environmental Science & Technology Letters (2024). DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00850

Though natural fertilizers made from treated sewage sludge are used to reintroduce nutrients onto agricultural fields, they bring along microplastic pollutants too. And according to a small-scale study published in Environmental Science & Technology Letters, more plastic particles get picked up by the wind than once thought. Researchers have discovered that the microplastics are released from fields more easily than similarly sized dust particles, becoming airborne from even a slight breeze.

Microplastics, or small bits of plastic less than 5 millimeters long, have appeared everywhere from clouds to heart tissues. And with these plastics' increasing prevalence in people and , they've also been found in sewage and wastewater.

Though sewage solids might not immediately seem like a useful product, after treatment they can form "biosolids," which are applied to as a natural, renewable source of fertilizer.

According to estimates by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, over 2 million dry metric tons of biosolids—roughly half of the total amount collected by wastewater treatment plants—are applied to land each year.

As a result, microplastics in these biosolids have the chance to reenter the environment. Because the plastics could carry other pollutants from the wastewater they originated from, they can be potentially dangerous when inhaled. So, Sanjay Mohanty and colleagues wanted to investigate how wind could pick up and transport microplastic particles from biosolid-treated .

The team analyzed airborne microplastics in wind-blown sediments that were gathered during wind-tunnel experiments on two plots of biosolid-treated land in rural Washington state.

The researchers discovered that these wind-blown sediments contained higher concentrations of microplastics than either the biosolids or the source soil itself. This enrichment effect is caused by the being less dense than soil minerals, such as quartz, and less "sticky"—they're not trapped as easily by moisture as the soil minerals are.

As a result, microplastics can be picked up by a breeze more easily than soil minerals, and winds that might not be strong enough to kick up dust could still be introducing microplastics into the air.

The researchers say that previous models did not take this sticky effect and other unique properties of microplastics into account when estimating emissions from treated fields. Therefore, these older models are likely to underestimate the actual amount of plastic particles released into the air.

Calculations by Mohanty and colleagues indicate that microplastics may be emitted from barren agricultural fields from nearly two and a half times more wind events than previously estimated. The researchers say this work highlights an underappreciated way that microplastics could become airborne.

More information: Preferential Emission of Microplastics from Biosolid-Applied Agricultural Soils: Field Evidence and Theoretical Framework, Environmental Science & Technology Letters (2024). DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00850

Citation: Small-scale study finds microplastics from natural fertilizers are blowing in the wind more often than once thought (2024, January 17) retrieved 16 April 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

How microplastics are making their way into our farmland


Feedback to editors