This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


peer-reviewed publication

trusted source


End of stop-and-frisk practice in Chicago led to increase in minority traffic stops, research suggests

End of stop-and-frisk practice in Chicago led to increase in minority traffic stops
The substitution of traffic stops for pedestrian stops. The shaded region marks the period between the announcement (in August 2015) and implementation (January 2016) of an ACLU agreement requiring extensive new documentation for pedestrian stops. In the intervening months, the release of a video of a police shooting (November) and the announcement of a DOJ investigation (December) also heightened scrutiny of the Chicago Police. Sources: Traffic-stop data from the Illinois Department of Transportation . For 2015 and earlier, pedestrian-stop data from the Chicago Police Department's contact card dataset; for 2016 and later, pedestrian-stop data from the Investigatory Stop Report dataset. Credit: Science Advances (2023). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adh3017

A pair of civil rights researchers with the University of California has found evidence suggesting that ceasing one practice that violated citizen rights in Chicago may have led to the initiation of another. In their paper published in the journal Science Advances, David Hausman and Dorothy Kronick describe how they analyzed traffic and pedestrian stops in Chicago following new rules that made it much more difficult for police officers to conduct stop-and-frisk searches in the city.

Over the past several decades, across the United States have been highlighting various behaviors by , average citizens, and especially police officers that violate the civil rights of minorities. One such behavior, dubbed stop-and-frisk, was where police officers could stop any person they came across and frisk them, ostensibly for weapons, but oftentimes for drugs as well. It was noted that most such stops involved minorities.

In such cases, police were allowed to conduct such searches whenever they had "reasonable suspicion" of a weapon. Then, in 2013, a ruled that such actions by officers working for the New York Police Department were unconstitutional. That led across the U.S. to change such practices, including the Chicago Police Department. Officials there changed the rules and began forcing police officers to produce extensive evidence to backup up reasonable suspicion on such stops, which led to a steep decline in such searches.

In this new effort, the researchers wondered if the CPD had found other ways to achieve roughly the same results using other practices. To find out, they obtained and analyzed records from the Illinois Department of Transportation that listed pedestrian and traffic stops by throughout the state, which included Chicago.

In looking at the data, the research pair found that stop-and-frisk procedures had dropped dramatically in Chicago starting in January of 2016, when the new rules came into effect—from 20 per 100 citizens to just 4 in 100. They noted that the rate remained low through 2019, the duration of the study period. But they also noted that traffic stops in Chicago increased from an average of 3.2 to 22 stops per 100 citizens over the same time period.

The researchers also noted that such stops occurred much more often with minority drivers and in the same neighborhoods where stop-and-frisk searches had been reduced. The research pair acknowledge that they found no direct evidence linking the two behaviors, but suggest it appears likely that there is a connection between them.

More information: David Hausman et al, The illusory end of stop and frisk in Chicago?, Science Advances (2023). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adh3017

Journal information: Science Advances

© 2023 Science X Network

Citation: End of stop-and-frisk practice in Chicago led to increase in minority traffic stops, research suggests (2023, October 2) retrieved 1 December 2023 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Why it's hard to tell where police are treating minorities unfairly


Feedback to editors