This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

proofread

Enhanced chemical weathering: A solution to the climate crisis?

Enhanced chemical weathering: A solution to the climate crisis?
Possible changes to the Earth system as inferred by δ7Li data and model results. Credit: Nature Geoscience (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41561-023-01234-y

Could blending of crushed rock with arable soil lower global temperatures? Researchers of Mainz University have studied global warming events from 40 and 56 million years ago to find answers. Their research paper has recently been published in Nature Geoscience.

The Earth is getting hotter and consequences have been made manifest this summer around the world. Looking back in , global warming events are not uncommon: Around 56 million years ago, during the period known as the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), the temperatures rose by an average of 5 to 8° Celsius. This development was most likely linked to increased volcanism and the associated release of masses of into the atmosphere. The higher temperatures persisted for about 200,000 years.

Back in 2021, Professor Philip Pogge von Strandmann of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (JGU) had already investigated the effect that eventually led to global cooling and climatic recovery after the PETM warming. In short, rainwater combined with the , resulting in that caused enhanced weathering of rock, thus releasing calcium and magnesium.

Rivers then transported the calcium, magnesium, and carbonic acid into the oceans where the calcium, magnesium—and also the carbon dioxide—came together to form insoluble limestone.

"In other words, there is a feedback effect that helps control the climate. High temperatures accelerate the chemical rock weathering process, reducing the levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, allowing the climate to recover," said Pogge von Strandmann.

Climate required twice as long to regenerate 40 million years ago

Climate warming occurred again 16 million years after the PETM during the Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum or MECO. Although resulted in the discharge of roughly the same amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as during the PETM, it took far longer for the climate to restabilize. The warming effect lasted for an immense 400,000 years, twice as long as in the PETM. Why was recovery so slow during that period?

In searching for an answer, Pogge von Strandmann and co-authors, including first author Alex Krause, began analyzing 40-million-year-old oceanic carbonates and clay minerals to compare the results with those for similar 56-million-year-old examples.

"Just as during the PETM, there was also intensified weathering and erosion in the MECO. However, there was far less exposed rock on the Earth's surface 40 million years ago. Instead, the Earth was extensively covered by a global rainforest the soil of which largely consisted of ," explained the researcher.

In contrast with rock, clay does not weather; in fact, it is actually the product of weathering. "So despite the high temperatures, the widespread clay soil prevented rocks from being effectively weathered, a process known as soil shielding," the geoscientist said.

Enhanced weathering for climate protection

How can we use this knowledge in today's world? "We study paleoclimates to determine whether and how we can positively influence our present climate. One option might be to boost the chemical weathering of rock. To help achieve this, we could plow finely crushed rock into our fields," said Pogge von Strandmann. The fine-grained particles of rock would erode rapidly, resulting in the binding of atmospheric carbon dioxide, thus enabling the climate to recuperate.

Negative emissions technologies (NETs) such as this involving the absorption of carbon dioxide are the subjects of intense research across the globe. At the same time, however, if the weathering results in the formation of clay, the effects of the process would be significantly less efficient, as Pogge von Strandmann has discovered. Clay retains the calcium and magnesium that would otherwise be delivered to the ocean. The carbon dioxide would continue to flow into the oceans, but it would not be bound there and would be able to escape back into the atmosphere. In this case, the weathering effect would have next to no influence on the climate.

If the rock particles fully dissolve as a result of weathering, the enhanced weathering concept would turn out to be 100% efficient. However, if all the weathered materials were turned into clay, this would in its turn completely nullify the effect.

In reality, the actual outcome would probably be somewhere between the two extremes: While there was enhanced erosion of rock in the PETM so that the normalized more rapidly, clay formation was predominant during the MECO. The extent to which the crushed rock dissolves and how much of it is preserved as clay depends on a range of local factors, such as the globally pre-existing levels of clay and rock.

So in order to establish whether the process of enhanced weathering is a viable approach, it would first be necessary to find out how much clay is formed during the process at each potential location.

More information: Alexander J. Krause et al, Enhanced clay formation key in sustaining the Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum, Nature Geoscience (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41561-023-01234-y

Journal information: Nature Geoscience

Provided by Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz

Citation: Enhanced chemical weathering: A solution to the climate crisis? (2023, August 29) retrieved 28 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2023-08-chemical-weathering-solution-climate-crisis.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

How quickly does the climate recover?

74 shares

Feedback to editors