This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
proofread
Interdisciplinary team tracks the fate of plastic waste in the North Sea
![Schematic illustration of the research activities conducted by the consortium in the German Bight. The tributaries are marked with bold letters: Elbe (A), Weser (B), and Ems (C). Numerical grids are shown as black boxes with increasing lateral resolution towards the coast. Satellite-tracked surface drifters (1) are shown in orange and the wooden drifters (2) are displayed as small brown plates. Hydrodynamic and atmospheric forces (3) are exemplarily shown in the illustration. River monitoring sites are indicated with small person (4). Research activities such as bottom trawling and the collection of in-situ hydrodynamic data are represented by the research vessel (5). The stakeholder analysis is shown with the pie chart (6) including the interests of various stakeholders (fisheries (6a), tourism (6b), industry (6c), and harbor activities (6d)). Credit: Frontiers in Marine Science (2023). DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1148714 The fate of plastic waste](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/800a/2023/the-fate-of-plastic-wa.jpg)
The dispersal pathways of plastic waste in the southern North Sea have been investigated by an interdisciplinary research team led by the University of Oldenburg. A key part of the "Macroplastics" project was the participation of citizens. The volunteers could use a special website to report the discovery of wooden plates that the team had released in the open sea and along the coast.
Two key findings are that there are no areas in the North Sea or the Skagerrak where plastic waste accumulates permanently and that a large proportion of the particles are quickly washed ashore.
Where do large plastic items such as shopping bags and disposable bottles which end up in the German Bight come from, and how do they get there? This was the key question addressed by a multidisciplinary team of the University of Oldenburg, Germany. In the research project "Macroplastics in the southern North Sea—Sources, Sinks and Abatement Strategies," the team conducted a comprehensive study to gain a better understanding of the problem and examine strategies for dealing with it.
The researchers also relied on the participation of local citizens to help track the distribution pathways of the plastic debris. An overview of the results has now been published in the journal Frontiers in Marine Science. Two key findings are that there are no areas in the North Sea or the Skagerrak where plastic waste accumulates permanently and that a large proportion of the particles are quickly washed ashore.
The team, which was made up of 15 scientists from the fields of marine science, geography and environmental planning began the project in 2016. The researchers employed an interdisciplinary approach to investigate how plastic items with a diameter of more than five millimeters are dispersed in the North Sea.
They conducted field experiments and calculated the pathways of virtual litter particles using numerical models. The team also recorded the plastic waste deposited on coastlines, in estuaries and on the seabed and deployed satellite-tracked surface drifters which floated on the sea surface, mimicking plastic debris. In addition, approximately 63,000 biodegradable wooden plates of around 8 by 10 centimeters in size were released from off-shore locations and land-based sites along the coast.
Local citizens who came across beached drifters were encouraged to report their find on a dedicated website. An analysis of the various stakeholders including the tourism sector, fisheries, industry and ports was also conducted as part of the study.
By combining their observations and model calculations the team obtained an overview of both the spatial distribution of the litter sources and the role played by different sectors such as tourism and industry. The results confirm that fisheries and municipal solid waste are the main sources of the litter, as previous studies had already shown.
A significant portion of the debris comes from the larger municipalities along the North Sea coastline and at the mouths of the Elbe, Weser and Ems rivers. Most of the wooden plates released in rivers was washed ashore while still in the waterways—just under half in the Elbe and almost 90 percent in the Ems. Moreover, the litter that washes up on the coast mainly comes from nearby sources.
In the coastal areas of the North Sea the main sources of litter were Germany and the Netherlands, whereas in the open sea most of the plastic particles came from the UK, France and the Netherlands.
The analyses of the dispersal pathways showed that two thirds of the wooden plates released from coastal and riverine locations were washed ashore again within 25 kilometers of the release site. Drifters released off-shore, however, traveled longer distances, with 30 percent floating across more than 250 kilometers before being beached.
Members of the public reported finding more than 27,000 drifters via the website—accounting for around 43 percent of those released. "This result underlines the significant role that citizen science can play in generating large data sets," the principal investigator Professor Dr. Jörg-Olaf Wolff says.
Another key finding was that litter particles can remain trapped for extended periods at oceanographic fronts. "These are zones where, for example, freshwater from a river meets salty seawater. Things can often get very turbulent there," explains oceanographer Dr. Jens Meyerjürgens from the University of Oldenburg's Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM).
Together with Dr. Marcel Ricker from the Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon in Geesthacht, he was the lead author of the recently published study. The data from the advanced satellite-tracked drifters showed that the devices often got stuck at these fronts for several days or even weeks, until the wind gained enough force to dislodge them.
This meant that more plastic particles were found on the seabed below these fronts than elsewhere. However, the researchers did not detect any permanent garbage patches in the North Sea like those that exist in the Pacific or the Atlantic.
The scientists also examined various strategies for reducing plastic litter inputs. According to the study the most promising step would be for municipalities to ban the use of disposable plastics such as plastic cups and cutlery at large events.
Stricter storage regulations at ports would also be a sensible measure since port operations account for around eight percent of the plastic waste in the North Sea. The researchers also see campaigns to raise awareness of the problem as important and emphasize that these efforts should focus on the fishing sector as a major source of marine litter.
Overall, the team is happy with the results of the study: "We received a lot of positive feedback on the wooden plates and surface drifters and observed an increased awareness of the problem among the population," says Dr. Thomas Badewien, a scientist at the ICBM and one of the lead researchers in the project. These are positive developments that give hope for the future, he added.
The interdisciplinary project team was made up of researchers from the ICBM and the Institute for Biology and Environmental Sciences (IBU) at the University of Oldenburg. The Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon was among the scientific partners. The project leader was Oldenburg oceanographer Prof. Dr. Jörg-Olaf Wolff.
More information: Jens Meyerjürgens et al, Sources, pathways, and abatement strategies of macroplastic pollution: an interdisciplinary approach for the southern North Sea, Frontiers in Marine Science (2023). DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1148714
Journal information: Frontiers in Marine Science
Provided by Carl von Ossietzky-Universität Oldenburg