This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


trusted source


Sympatric or micro-allopatric speciation in glacial lake? Genomic islands support neither

Sympatric or micro-allopatric speciation in glacial lake? Genomic islands support neither
Scenery during sampling. Credit: IHB

Speciation is one of the core issues in evolutionary biology. Sympatric speciation is the evolution of reproductive isolation without geographic barriers in which new species arise from a single ancestral population. However, bidirectional gene flow between species can retard or even reverse the population divergence in the early stages of sympatric speciation, raising doubts about this pattern of speciation.

Gymnocypris eckloni scoliostomus (GS) and G. eckloni eckloni (GE), two sister subspecies of G. eckloni (Cyprinidae: Schizothoracinae: Gymnocypris), are sympatrically distributed in Lake Sunmcuo on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Despite their close relationship, these two subspecies show significant differences in morphology, feeding preference and reproductive characteristics. The divergence time between the GS and GE lineages is estimated to be 20–60 Kya. All of these characteristics demonstrate that GS and GE satisfy the biogeographic criteria for sympatric speciation, which is crucial for the theoretical study of sympatric speciation.

Recently, a research group led by Prof. He Shunping from the Institute of Hydrobiology (IHB) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences demonstrated the speciation theory of sympatric speciation. This study was published in the National Science Review.

Using combined with theoretical simulation, the researchers examined the , phylogeny, , population dynamic history, gene flow, genomic island, and selection of the two species. They proposed that sympatric speciation might be a micro-parapatric speciation model.

The researchers then suggested that the geographical scale of speciation should be defined based on gene flow during speciation. For instance, there is no gene flow during allopatric speciation, whereas during sympatric speciation, gene flow should be unimpeded. They identified 54 large genomic islands (≥ 100 kb) of speciation, which accounted for 89.4% of the total length of all genomic islands. Although they clearly indicated speciation with gene flow and rejected micro-allopatric speciation, the genomic islands were too large to support the hypothesis of sympatric speciation.

Theoretical and recent empirical studies suggested that continual gene flow in sympatry should give rise to many small genomic islands (as small as a few kilobases in size). Thus, the observed pattern was consistent with the extensive evidence on parapatric speciation, in which adjacent habitats facilitate divergent selection but also permit during speciation.

In addition, these islands harbored divergent genes related to and olfaction signals that may play important roles in food selection and assortative mating in fishes.

This study suggests that many, if not most, of the reported cases of sympatric speciation are likely to be micro-parapatric .

More information: Ning Sun et al, Sympatric or micro-allopatric speciation in a glacial lake? Genomic islands support neither, National Science Review (2022). DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwac291

Citation: Sympatric or micro-allopatric speciation in glacial lake? Genomic islands support neither (2023, January 16) retrieved 26 March 2023 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Rapid evolution: New findings on its molecular mechanisms


Feedback to editors