This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

trusted source

proofread

Researchers develop a new ocean data quality control system

ocean
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Over the past century, more than 16 million ocean temperature profiles had been collected by various instruments. However, each instrumentation provides data of different accuracy, different quality, and different completion of the metadata.

Before using this to do the , the (QC) process is compulsory to ensure data accuracy and availability. In early years, the QC was usually performed manually by the experts. However, the manual QC of large datasets is not feasible due to the manpower and time cost.

Researchers from the Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and their collaborators provide a new climatological range-based automatic quality control system for ocean in-situ profiles. The system is called CAS Ocean Data Center—Quality Control system, or CODC-QC for short, and it includes 14 distinct quality checks to identify outliers.

The study was published in Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers.

"We developed this new QC system to provide a quality-homogenous database, with reduced human-workload and time cost on manual QC," said Tan Zhetao from IAP, first author of the study.

In CODC-QC, the 0.5% and 99.5% quantiles are used as thresholds to define local climatological ranges. These thresholds are time-varying, which aims at erroneously excluding real data during "extreme events." The above strategies are used in local climatological range check for both temperature and vertical temperature gradient, in which the anisotropic feature of water properties is accounted for, and the topography barriers adjustment of water mass are made.

In addition, the performance of CODC-QC system was evaluated using two expert/manual QC-ed benchmark datasets. This evaluation demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed scheme in removing spurious data and minimizing the percentage of mistakenly flagged good data.

The CODC-QC was also applied to global World Ocean Database (WOD18) including 16, 804, 361 temperature profiles from 1940 to 2021. Based on the statistics of temperature outliers, 7.97% of measurements were rejected, in which XBT data took the highest rejection rate (15.44%) whereas the Argo profiling float took the lowest rejection rate (2.39%). "We suggest a dependency of the quality of temperature observations on the instrumentation type," said Viktor Gouretski, researcher from IAP and co-author of the study.

The researchers also applied the CODC-QC system to the study of monitoring global ocean warming. "We found that the application of the CODC-QC system leads to a 15% difference for linear trend of the global 0–2000m ocean heat content changes within 1991–2021, compared with the application of WOD-QC (NOAA/NCEI), implying a non-negligible source of error in ocean heat content estimate," said Prof. Cheng Lijing from IAP, corresponding author of the study.

The quality-controlled (by CODC-QC) and bias-corrected in-situ profile data of CAS-Ocean Data Center, Global Ocean Science Database (CODC-GOSD) are now freely accessible at http://www.ocean.iap.ac.cn/ and http://english.casodc.com/.

More information: Zhetao Tan et al, A new automatic quality control system for ocean profile observations and impact on ocean warming estimate, Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers (2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2022.103961

Citation: Researchers develop a new ocean data quality control system (2023, January 30) retrieved 12 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2023-01-ocean-quality.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

A new method to correct systematic errors in ocean subsurface data

9 shares

Feedback to editors