This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


peer-reviewed publication

trusted source


Air quality improvements lead to more sulfur fertilizer use, shows study

Air quality improvements lead to more sulfur fertilizer use
a Conceptual model of S flows. b Trends in S inputs and estimated S output in maize. Areal loads are calculated as the total amount of S normalized by the total land area of the study region (atmospheric S deposition), the total cropland in the study region (all S fertilizer products), and area of maize planted (maize S). Best fit lines are slope = −0.12 kg S ha−1 yr−1, R2 = 0.96 (atmospheric S deposition), 0.10 kg S ha−1 yr−1, R2 = 0.82 (fertilizer S inputs), and slope = 0.06 kg S ha−1 yr−1, R2 = 0.46 (maize S). The linear models are statistically significant (p < 0.001). The slopes of all regression lines are significantly different from zero (p < 0.0001). The mass balance estimate (i.e., atmospheric S deposition and fertilizer inputs less maize S export) is shown for reference. A negative value indicates that atmospheric S deposition plus fertilizer S application exceed losses from maize export. A positive value shows that atmospheric S deposition plus fertilizer S application does not compensate for losses from maize export.

Sulfur, an essential nutrient for plants, was as free as air back in the 1980s, drifting down onto farmers' fields from the polluted sky. The nutrient also caused acid rain, however, and it triggered chemistry that meant more mercury in fish. Regulations led to less sulfur in the air, but in the Midwest, where sulfur-hungry corn and soybean fields were proliferating, crops still needed the nutrient.

"We find a clear increase in use commensurate with a decline in atmospheric deposition," said Eve-Lyn Hinckley, a Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) fellow, University of Colorado Boulder ecologist and lead author of a new assessment of sulfur fertilizer use. "We have compiled the first time-series of sulfur fertilizer data spanning decades, from 1985-2015."

As sulfur stopped dropping from the sky, farmers began applying it directly, Hinckley and her colleague, Charles Driscoll from Syracuse University, reported in late December in the journal Communications Earth & Environment. Moreover, sulfur fertilization accelerated quickly, they found, far outpacing the growth in use of other nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus.

That's significant, because sulfur's impacts can be serious: the chemical can essentially make , including toxic mercury, more "mobile" and more likely to make their way into fish, for example.

Hinckley said it's not yet clear how extensively sulfur fertilization impacts the mercury cycle.

"It's the same form of sulfur as was going on with . However, that was diffuse, widespread , and this is intense, targeted applications in much larger amounts." She and her colleagues are already digging into the connection, "looking at the potential interaction between agricultural sulfur runoff and stimulation of methylmercury formation downstream."

Even with the , farmers do need sulfur fertilizers, Hinckley said, and her work does not suggest prohibiting them. In the case of other nutrients that can cause environmental harm when applied in excess of crop requirements—such as nitrogen and phosphorus—agricultural experts have learned how to minimize damage with selective timing and amounts of application. That's the goal of her work with sulfur, she said. "We want to help people use it smartly and understand what it does in the environment."

More information: Eve-Lyn S. Hinckley et al, Sulfur fertiliser use in the Midwestern US increases as atmospheric sulfur deposition declines with improved air quality, Communications Earth & Environment (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s43247-022-00662-9

Citation: Air quality improvements lead to more sulfur fertilizer use, shows study (2023, January 9) retrieved 24 July 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Toward more sustainable wine: Scientists can now track sulfur from grapes to streams


Feedback to editors