Balancing climate and development goals

Credit: CC0 Public Domain

The impact on climate change would only be modest if countries in the process of development were to delay efforts to reduce their carbon emissions until they reach a certain level of economic growth.

That is the key finding in a new study published today in Environmental Research Letters by scientists from the Carnegie Institution for Science, U.S. and the University of Waterloo, Canada.

The study explores the climate consequences that would emerge should developing countries reach a specific per-capita GDP level before they start to focus their efforts on reducing . Using historical records of CO2 emissions combined with gross domestic product (GDP) and from the World Bank, scientists Lei Duan and Ken Caldeira from the Carnegie Institution for Science with Juan Moreno-Cruz from the University of Waterloo, created a wide range of future scenarios in which CO2 emissions increase according to historical trends and then start to decline only when countries reach a specified income level.

Lei Duan from the Carnegie Institution for Science said: "Decarbonisation is not often the priority for less , at least not compared to ensuring economic growth and provision of energy services. As these countries work their way towards prosperity, they need to strike a balance between climate and development goals. But if developing countries wait to adopt measures to reduce their CO2 emissions, we need to know what the climate implications of that would be."

The study found that if countries were to begin to decarbonise when per-capita GDP exceeded $10,000, there would be less than 0.3°C of additional warming. If countries above that GDP level reduce emissions at a rate of 2% each year, the delay in decarbonisation from developing countries would represent only an estimated 6% between 2020 and 2100 to total cumulative CO2 emissions.

Juan Moreno-Cruz from the University of Waterloo said: "Over half the world's population currently lives in countries below an income threshold of $10,000, yet our study shows that a lack of participation in decarbonisation amongst these countries would have relatively little impact on the global temperature change."

However, the paper warns that lock-ins into long-term emission emitting technologies must be avoided. "The challenge is to make sure fossil fuel investments made today do not create an infrastructure or political constituency that would make a low-carbon future infeasible." Ken Caldeira from the Carnegie Institution for Science explains. "The risk is that less-developed countries become addicted to fossil-fuelled development and find the habit hard to kick as they become more wealthy. Near-term energy system investments must address near-term needs, but must take place in the context of the longer-term development of a modern low carbon- economy."

Lei Duan goes on to say: "We recognise that all countries need to work together to achieve the Paris agreement ambitions of holding temperature rises to no more than 2°C above pre-industrial levels, with an aspiration of a 1.5C limit. But this study shows, across a wide range of scenarios and assumptions, that the greater impact will come from middle and high income countries' decarbonisation."

Explore further

Would a carbon tax help to innovate more-efficient energy use?

More information: Lei Duan et al, Balancing climate and development goals, Environmental Research Letters (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abbe46
Journal information: Environmental Research Letters

Citation: Balancing climate and development goals (2020, December 15) retrieved 5 March 2021 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments