September 2, 2020

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

Uncovering the acoustical properties of Stonehenge

The 1:12 Acoustic Scale Model of Stonehenge in the semi-anechoic chamber. This is the monument after the bluestones had been re-arranged, c.2200 BC. It is approximately 2.5 m wide. Text annotations: (A) outer sarsen circle; (B) outer bluestone circle; (C) inner trilithon horseshoe and (D) inner bluestone oval. Credit: Journal of Archaeological Science (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105218
× close
The 1:12 Acoustic Scale Model of Stonehenge in the semi-anechoic chamber. This is the monument after the bluestones had been re-arranged, c.2200 BC. It is approximately 2.5 m wide. Text annotations: (A) outer sarsen circle; (B) outer bluestone circle; (C) inner trilithon horseshoe and (D) inner bluestone oval. Credit: Journal of Archaeological Science (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105218

A trio of researchers, two with the University of Salford, the third with English Heritage, has built a small-scale model of Stonehenge to test the acoustical properties of the ancient monument. In their paper published in the Journal of Archaeological Science, Trevor Cox, Bruno Fazenda and Susan Greaney describe their efforts to recreate the acoustic properties of Stonehenge back when it was new, and what they learned.

Stonehenge is, of course, a famous on Salisbury Plain in Wiltshire, England. The circle of stones has been studied by many people over the years. In this new effort, the researchers wondered if the circle of stones might have given the monument some interesting acoustical properties. To find out, they built a small-scale that depicted the state of the monument when it was still in use and then tested its acoustical properties.

To accurately recreate the monument, the researchers used laser scan data from work by other researchers as input for a 3-D printer. They also used data from other research efforts to recreate stones from scratch that are missing at the Stonehenge site. All of the simulated stones were treated to replicate the acoustical properties of the actual stones in England.

With their one-12th scale model complete, the researchers set up speakers and microphones in and around their model and then tested its acoustical features. The testing consisted of playing chirping noises that ran the gamut from very low to very high frequencies. Data from the microphones was recorded and then analyzed.

The microphone (left) and source (right). Credit: Journal of Archaeological Science (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105218
× close
The microphone (left) and source (right). Credit: Journal of Archaeological Science (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105218

The researchers found that the physical properties of the stones, such as their makeup and shape, contributed to reverberation inside the monument. More specifically, they found that the time of decay to 60 decibels was 0.6 seconds inside the monument—but not outside of it. The researchers suggest that such a degree of reverberation would have enhanced verbal communications inside the monument. It would have also made music and drums sound better—similar to the way reverberation is used on modern music recordings. They also noted that there would not have been an echo due to the way the stones were arranged, with some placed just outside of the circle.

The researchers also note that they do not believe that Stonehenge was constructed purely for its acoustical properties—work by other researchers has shown that it was most likely used for such things as burial rituals. Its acoustical properties would have been an added feature.

More information: Trevor J. Cox et al. Using scale modelling to assess the prehistoric acoustics of stonehenge, Journal of Archaeological Science (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105218

Journal information: Journal of Archaeological Science

Load comments (0)