Space can solve our looming resource crisis—but the space industry itself must be sustainable

Space can solve our looming resource crisis – but the space industry itself must be sustainable
Shoot for the skies, but do it sustainably. Credit: SpaceX/EPA/AAP Image

Australia's space industry is set to grow into a multibillion-dollar sector that could provide tens of thousands of jobs and help replenish the dwindling stocks of precious resources on Earth. But to make sure they don't flame out prematurely, space companies need to learn some key lessons about sustainability.

Sustainability is often defined as meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Often this definition is linked to the economic need for growth. In our context, we link it to the social and material needs of our communities.

We cannot grow without limit. In 1972, the influential report The Limits to Growth argued that if society's growth continued at projected rates, humans would experience a "sudden and uncontrollable decline in both population and industrial capacity" by 2070. Recent research from the University of Melbourne's institute updated and reinforced these conclusions.

Our insatiable hunger for resources increases as we continue to strive to improve our way of life. But how does our relate to the ?

There are two ways we could try to avert this forecast collapse: we could change our behavior from consumption to conservation, or we could find new sources to replenish our stocks of non-renewable resources. Space presents an opportunity to do the latter.

Asteroids provide an almost limitless opportunity to mine rare earth metals such as gold, cobalt, nickel and platinum, as well as the resources required for the future exploration of our solar system, such as water ice. Water ice is crucial to our further exploration efforts as it can be refined into liquid water, oxygen, and rocket fuel.

But for future space missions to top up our dwindling resources on Earth, our space industries themselves must be sustainable. That means building a sustainable culture in these industries as they grow.

How do we measure sustainability?

Triple bottom-line accounting is one of the most common ways to assess the sustainability of a company, based on three crucial areas of impact: social, environmental, and financial. A combined framework can be used to measure performance in these areas.

In 2006, UTS sustainable business researcher Suzanne Benn and her colleagues introduced a method for assessing the corporate sustainability of an organization in the social and environmental areas. This work was extended in 2014 by her colleague Bruce Perrott to include the financial dimension.

This model allows the assessment of an organization based on one of six levels of sustainability. The six stages, in order, are: rejection, non-responsiveness, compliance, efficiency, strategic proactivity, and the sustaining corporation.

Space can solve our looming resource crisis – but the space industry itself must be sustainable
Asteroids: limitless potential. Credit: ESO/M. Kornmesser/AAP Image

Sustainability benchmarking the space industry

In my research, which I presented this week at the Australian Space Research Conference in Adelaide, I used these models to assess the sustainability of the American space company SpaceX.

Using freely available information about SpaceX, I benchmarked the company as compliant (level 3 of 6) within the sustainability framework.

While SpaceX has been innovative in designing ways to travel into space, this innovation has not been for environmental reasons. Instead, the company is focused on bringing down the cost of launches.

SpaceX also relies heavily on government contracts. Its profitability has been questioned by several analysts with the capital being raised through the use of loans and the sale of future tickets in the burgeoning space tourism industry. Such a transaction might be seen as an exercise in revenue generation, but accountants would classify such a sale as a liability.

The growing use of forward sales is a growing concern for the industry, with other tourism companies such as Virgin Galactic failing to secure growth. It has been reported that Virgin Galactic will run out of customers by 2023 due to the high costs associated with space travel.

SpaceX's culture also rates poorly for sustainability. As at many startups, employees at SpaceX are known to work more than 80 hours a week without taking their mandatory breaks. This problem was the subject of a lawsuit settled in 2017. Such behavior contravenes Goal 8 of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, which seeks to achieve "decent work for all".

What's next?

Australia is in a unique position. As the newest player in the global space industry, the investment opportunity is big. The federal government predicts that by 2030, the space sector could be a A$12 billion industry employing 20,000 people.

Presentations at the Australian Space Research Conference by the Australian Space Agency made one thing clear: regulation is coming. We can use this to gain a competitive edge.

By embedding sustainability principles into emerging space startups, we can avoid the economic cost of having to correct bad behaviors later.

We will gain the first-mover advantage on implementing these principles, which will in turn increase investor confidence and improve company valuations.

To ensure that the sector can last long enough to provide real benefits for Australia and the world, its defining principle must be sustainability.


Explore further

Space Sustainability Rating aims to address growing amount of space debris orbiting earth

Provided by The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.The Conversation

Citation: Space can solve our looming resource crisis—but the space industry itself must be sustainable (2019, October 3) retrieved 20 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-10-space-looming-resource-crisisbut-industry.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
24 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Oct 03, 2019
it would be a serious error of judgement by policy influencers to expect Space resources to solve the Earth's problems

we cannot rely on comicbook promises to resolve the needs of Earth's people
we need to make a global comittment at conservative efficiency, stop being so selfishly wasteful. create more ways of providing for peoples needs & invent means to replace &recycle limited critical materials

Space resources are only valuable when used in space
the only thing i can see as a possible valuable enough to sell down to Earh are phosphates

problem is, phosphates in space are absolutely necessary for Human habitation as water & carbon
& there is only a limited supply compared to demand

if you consider gold worth shipping down?
you'd crash the commodities market
in space gold is valuable for radiation resistant electronics & shielding ships & habitats

better ROI if you keep gold useful & secure at work in space
while you make a market, selling shares of fungible goods toEarth

Oct 03, 2019
Yeah if we can't solve resource problems on Earth then we are just going to bring those problems with us into outer space.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more