Mourning a dead glacier: How grieving over ecological destruction can help us face the climate crisis

Iceland is mourning a dead glacier – how grieving over ecological destruction can help us face the climate crisis
Left: Okjökull glacier in September 1986. Right: the now dead glacier in August 2019. Credit: Joshua Stevens/NASA Earth Observatory

Death certificates and commemorative plaques aren't something you'd normally associate with a glacier. But that is exactly how Iceland recently mourned the loss of 700-year-old Okjökull, the first of its major glaciers to die.

This is just one early example of events we will encounter more and more often as the hot new world we are creating slowly destroys ecosystems and livelihoods. But acknowledging the growing emotional trauma and grief felt at present and future environmental tragedies may yet be the kick we need to limit their reach.

Grief radically differs in its logic from ordinary sadness over a loss. If sadness is the response to the removal of an object from the tablecloth that represents a person's lived world, grief results from loss that tears the very fabric of that cloth. In order to repair this hole and emerge from the resulting pain and outrage, the lived world has to be reconfigured.

To grieve though, one must acknowledge the tear in that world. This can take time, and denial is a common part of the process of accepting deep loss. This may at first take the form of a temptation toward out-and-out disbelief, and linger as sporadic thoughts and hopes that what was lost, wasn't.

It may seem an irrational reaction, but it's a completely understandable defence mechanism against life-shattering loss. The world without what's been lost is so radically and qualitatively different that the psyche resists accepting reality.

While much climate denial owes itself to corruption and vested interests, the avoidance of grief may explain why many decent and intelligent people are also tempted to deny the climatic breakdown humans are causing.

It is, in a certain sense, unimaginable, even absurd, to think of us destabilising our very climate, or the scale and speed of change required to stop the slide. It isn't surprising that so many people have been desperately hoping that the science must somehow be wrong, or that so many more act as if we can still hope for the continuation of our same old world, rather than the fundamental shift in the way we operate and organise that's required.

From grief to action

It requires sustained strength and attention to gradually turn denial into acceptance and to build a new life. Actions like Iceland's glacier funeral are a vital part of that process. As symbols of eternity, glaciers have great cultural significance on the Nordic island. They're also crucial for tourism and energy. And at current rates of warming, all of the country's will suffer Okjökull's fate in the next 200 years, one by one. For Icelanders, emotionally acknowledging this can galvanise the associated grief into action.

It's not an easy process, of course. As marks of our recklessness, the grief in cases such as this is particularly potent and often laden with anger, akin to that of someone close to a murder victim. This glacier ecosystem wasn't "lost"—to speak of loss here is euphemistic. It was killed on our watch.

Iceland is mourning a dead glacier – how grieving over ecological destruction can help us face the climate crisis
During Okjökull’s funeral residents reminisced, public figures such as Iceland’s Prime Minister Katrin Jakobsdottir spoke and presented a death certificate, and this plaque was laid. Credit: Grétar Thorvaldsson & Málmsteypan Hella/Rice University

Grief over climate breakdown and the degradation of our natural world is also notably different from grief at the death of a loved one, because it never lessens, let alone goes away. The anthropogenic climate emergency will define our entire lifetime, and deeply impact on all of us soon enough. Because of time-lags in the climate system, things will get worse for a long time to come, whatever we do.

Thus, while a healthy reaction to the death of a loved one is to grieve deeply and then gradually to recover, the only recovery from ecological grief that is possible at all is for us to change the world such that our actions no longer deteriorate it.

This is how ecological —at the tearing from us of the we are neither willing nor able to do without—leads to the radical action necessary to bring about a new world.

Given how late the hour is, that means not accepting inaction any longer—and that's up to us. In the words of Iceland's commemorative plaque, laid at the base of the dead glacier as a message to the future: "We know what is happening and what needs to be done. Only you know if we did it."


Explore further

Family members can share grief during the holidays, but how each person grieves is different

Provided by The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.The Conversation

Citation: Mourning a dead glacier: How grieving over ecological destruction can help us face the climate crisis (2019, August 21) retrieved 19 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-08-dead-glacier-grieving-ecological-destruction.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
13 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Aug 21, 2019
This is how ecological grief—at the tearing from us of the natural systems we are neither willing nor able to do without—leads to the radical action necessary to bring about a new world.

Just for fun, instead of emoting, try science for a change. But if you really need a good cry, mourn the thousands of mile-thick glaciers that covered much of the northern hemisphere and survived for tens of thousands of years until Mother Nature wiped them out about 10,000 years ago. Kinda makes the loss of a puny, 700-year old glacier like Okjökull insignificant in the greater scheme. Humans flourished as temperatures finally turned balmy after a 75,000 year ice age and huge swaths of land became arable. Me, personally, I see the current warm period as a good thing, but I'm the glass-half-full kind.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more