How California keeps blocking Trump's environmental rollbacks

Credit: CC0 Public Domain

California's sweeping deal with four major automakers last week to boost gas mileage standards and cut tailpipe emissions wasn't the first time the Golden State has outmaneuvered the Trump administration, which has been planning instead to loosen pollution rules for car companies nationwide.

Rather than a one-time tactic, the agreement announced Thursday between the state and Ford, Honda, Volkswagen and BMW is the latest in a growing list of ways that California has blunted, blocked or shut down entirely nearly all of the Trump administration's major efforts to rewrite in California from the moment he took office.

Yet more than halfway through his term, experts say, the president has had almost no lasting impact on California's major environmental rules despite making broad promises and appointing former industry officials into top jobs. The reason: California, a quasi-country with 40 million people and the world's fifth-largest economy, has been aggressively passing its own state laws, filing lawsuits against the and cutting deals with other states and countries to go around the Trump White House.

"California is showing that it is nimble and able to outwit and outlast the administration in Washington," said Michael Wara, a Stanford University environmental law professor.

"That's part of what infuriates the Trump administration," he added. "People in California are basically saying, 'We'll be here when you are gone.'"

When former Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke issued a plan last year to open most of the West Coast to new oil drilling, including California, by as soon as 2020, California legislators passed a law nine months later prohibiting construction of all new oil and gas pipelines in state waters up to three miles out to sea along the entire California coastline. Now, oil from any new platforms built off places such as the Sonoma Coast, Big Sur or Malibu can't be brought to shore.

"Not here, not now," said former Gov. Jerry Brown, when he signed the measure in September. "We will not let the federal government pillage public lands and destroy our treasured coast."

Similarly, when Trump pulled out of the Paris Climate Agreement of 194 nations in 2017, Brown began signing deals with dozens of other states and countries to meet the Paris goals anyway. He held an international climate summit in San Francisco last fall and met with heads of state, including Pope Francis, to craft climate agreements.

After Trump released an "America First Energy Plan" shortly after taking office that called for dramatically more coal and oil use but which included almost no mention of solar, wind or other renewable energy, California lawmakers pivoted in the opposite direction.

They passed a new law last fall requiring 100% of the state's electricity to come from solar, wind, hydropower or other carbon-free sources by 2045. And in recent months, other states have followed suit, including Colorado, Washington, New Mexico and Nevada.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo this month signed a landmark law that requires 70% of New York state's electricity to come from renewable sources by 2030 and 100% of its electricity to come from renewable and carbon-free sources by 2040. The law also commits New York to building huge new offshore wind farms in the ocean and solar farms across the state.

"Local governments and state governments have been taking action all over the country," said Kathryn Phillips, executive director of Sierra Club California. "It's kind of been a double-edge sword. On one hand, Trump has given voice to backwards ideas, like expanding coal. But he also has awakened people who want their kids to have a livable world."

There are numerous other examples. The Trump EPA announced it would drop plans by the Obama administration to ban chlorpyrifos, a pesticide linked to brain damage in children. In May, California's EPA issued new rules to phase the chemical out statewide. When the Trump administration drafted rules to weaken wetlands protections, California wrote rules to strengthen them.

One bill in Sacramento, which has passed the state Senate, would even require California to follow older federal environmental standards as state policy if Trump successfully phases them out.

To be sure, even as California unravels or stalls Trump's efforts to dismantle environmental regulations, there are limits.

Enforcement actions by the U.S. EPA against industries that pollute the air and water fell to their lowest level in 30 years last year. The EPA made only 166 referrals for prosecution to the Department of Justice, a drop of nearly 60% from 2011 and 72% decline from 1998. Trump's current EPA Administrator, Andrew Wheeler, is a former lobbyist for the coal industry.

"There has definitely been a reduction in oversight. That is corrosive." said Jared Blumenfeld, secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency.

Blumenfeld, who was West Coast director for the U.S. EPA under President Barack Obama and who once worked for environmental groups such as the Natural Resources Defense Council, said federal inaction on climate change affects California and will leave lasting impacts in other parts of the United States.

"We have as a state been incredibly vigilant and worked to back fill the protections Trump has eroded," Blumenfeld said. "That being said, the pace and scale of his program of eliminating environmental protections is enormous and is having massive impacts in other states."

Some observers wondered why automakers would sign a voluntary deal with California for tighter rules on their tailpipe emissions when Trump was looking to weaken rules.

Under the deal, automakers agreed to boost the fuel economy of their new vehicle fleets to 50 miles per gallon by 2026, by cutting their greenhouse gas emissions 3.7% each year. The agreement is similar to a rule that the Obama administration put in place, but which had a deadline one year earlier.

The Trump administration has been working since last year to undo it and to strip California of its ability under the federal Clean Air Act to set its own tailpipe standards. The four automakers—who make up 30% of the U.S. auto market—feared that because California already has sued the Trump administration, that the issue could ping-pong in court for years, hampering their ability to design new car fleets with certainty.

Other countries—from China to Europe—also are demanding cleaner vehicles, noted Fran Pavley, a former state senator who wrote several of California's landmark climate bills.

"The automobile manufacturers didn't want to have to make two types of vehicles," said Pavley, now at the University of Southern California. "This will become the de facto national policy."

Explore further

Automakers reach emissions deal with California, in rebuff to Trump

©2019 The Mercury News (San Jose, Calif.)
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Citation: How California keeps blocking Trump's environmental rollbacks (2019, July 29) retrieved 24 August 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jul 29, 2019
California has blunted, blocked or shut down entirely nearly all of the Trump administration's major efforts to rewrite environmental policies in California from the moment he took office

The author displays a shocking ignorance of the U.S. Constitution. The federal government cannot "rewrite" California's environmental policies. It can only rewrite federal government policies. Which the current administration fully understands.

For several decades California has had more stringent automobile emission allowances than the U.S. federal government. The federal government can't change California's policies, nor have they even tried.

This story full of its own virtue about California sticking it to the Trump administration is a non-story, at least for the informed electorate who actually understand the Constitution and division of powers.

The Trump administration has only "eroded" ridiculous and economically unachievable mileage standards set by the Obama administration.

Jul 29, 2019

So what's the lawsuit for, @assdad?

Jul 29, 2019
@askdad: "The author displays a shocking ignorance of the U.S. Constitution."

No, you do. Under the commerce clause the Congress has the power "To regulate Commerce ... among the several States" - aka, interstate commerce. Since pollution is never limited to one state and since the effects of pollution can be shown to affect interstate commerce in oh-so-many ways, particularly air pollution, Congress can write national rules that everyone has to follow.

Additionally, as the story noted, the auto companies want some assurances of the standards they'll need to meet in manufacturing cars. Cars, trucks, etc. are "interstate commerce" by nature. Hence, Congress can regulate.

California's regulations are constitutionally suspect under Kassel v United States, where the Supreme Court held Iowa's ban on extra-long semi-trailer trucks unconstitutional because of their effect on interstate commerce. That said, Go California!!!

You are the one who should brush up on the Constitution.

Jul 29, 2019
Actually, I spoke too broadly about California's regs being constitutionally suspect. To the extent any state's regulations are more strict than an established national standard set by the federal government, the regulations become a burden on interstate commerce and may be suspect. Here, that rationale may not apply at all with regard to the automakers because there isn't a rule in place but a contract voluntarily entered into by the car manufacturers. And it is difficult to foretell how Trump's new appointees to the Court might view the Commerce Clause. They seem to have little regard for precedent and established law.

Jul 29, 2019
CA govt is committed to replacing wealthy people and their successful companies with immigrants living off of govt handouts.

"In 2007, for example, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service designated 197,000 acres in Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, San Diego and Ventura counties as "critical habitat" for the coastal California gnatcatcher, a small bird. The agency estimated the cost of designation would be $640 million over 23 years... Yet according to David Sunding... the true costs of designating this critical habitat are actually four to five times greater, totaling between $2.6 to $3.2 billion."

"in 2005, Fish and Wildlife Service designated over 850,000 acres in Central and Southern California as critical habitat for 15 species.. estimated this designation would cost approximately $250 million over 20 years... actual costs... 7 to 14 times higher, or as much as $3.5 billion"

"Democrats, Newsom don't care California is $1.3T in debt..."

Jul 29, 2019
This demographic reengineering is in anticipation of pending earthquakes and other disasters. Poor people are living without insurance which insulates the big insurance companies from the inevitable bankrupting property and medical payouts. Immigrants keep economies running while the wealthy sneak out the back door. And when disaster hits the poor are left to sweep up all the debris.

Hey its not my plan. But it is obvious that it certainly is someones plan.

Jul 29, 2019
The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not based in California. Maybe you forgot.

Jul 30, 2019
yje usual quisling rants from aksdad & otto
seu & the other altright fairytails will be worming in soon

parroting the usual Un-American politically correct fascist racist slogans
claiming to be conservatives yet acting recklessly wasteful & spendthrift

Jul 30, 2019
Is this a word or some sort of poetic licence? Does it rhyme with one of your brainless catchphrases?

Your handlers are using illegals for fun and profit. You're fine with it because you both use the same alliteration.

Jul 30, 2019
they haven't drilled a new water well or built a new reservoir in 40 years. no new power plants either. the government of california is not a friend of the people.

Jul 30, 2019
"Your handlers are using illegals for fun and profit"
oh deer otto, that would only be true if i was an employee of the trump crime family
those "towers of trumpeting corruption" did not build themselves
those wastedlands of vulgar trumpetry golf courses do not mow them,selves
it takes a lot of taxpayer subsidies & embezzling charities to pay for all that plutocratic braggadocio

the shoofly buzzes
yet for all the treasonous activities by the GOP quislings & the NRA copperheads

California's people choose their own course
which really burns you puppets of Wahhabi fascism

Jul 30, 2019
This story full of its own virtue about California sticking it to the Trump administration is a non-story, at least for the informed electorate who actually understand the Constitution and division of powers.
Trump's tax returns required under new California election law

Meanwhile on the east coast, Tracking 29 Investigations Related to Trump

Looks like the beginning of the end, bombshell report, the walls are closing in, turning point, donald trump is done, this is the tipping point, it's over, trump is in trouble

Aug 01, 2019
Does the federal DOJ policy prohibiting prosecution of a sitting president have any effect on state charges?

Aug 02, 2019
Well, Clinton was forced to give a deposition in the civil case, Jones v. Clinton. I was pretty sure at the time that this would backfire on the conservatroids and here we are.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more