Police cam maker nixes facial recognition deployment

Police equipment maker Axon said facial recognition won't be used on its body cameras after an ethics review found the technolog
Police equipment maker Axon said facial recognition won't be used on its body cameras after an ethics review found the technology was not yet reliable enough

Police equipment manufacturer Axon said Thursday it decided against deploying facial recognition on its body cameras after an ethics review found the technology "is not yet reliable enough."

Axon, formerly known as Taser and maker of the eponymous nonlethal police weapon, made its decision after a report by its that came amid intense debate on the use face matching technology for and surveillance.

"Current face matching technology raises serious ethical concerns," chief executive and founder Rick Smith said in a statement.

"In addition, there are technological limitations to using this technology on body cameras. Consistent with the board's recommendation, Axon will not be commercializing face matching products on our body cameras at this time."

Smith said face matching technology "deserves further research" to help understand issues around error and algorithmic bias in the technology which is based on artificial intelligence.

"Our AI team will continue to evaluate the state of face technologies and will keep the board informed about our research."

The Axon board report said face recognition technology "is not currently reliable enough to ethically justify its use on body-worn cameras" and added, "at the least, face recognition technology should not be deployed until the technology performs with far greater accuracy and performs equally well across races, ethnicities, genders, and other identity groups."

Facial recognition technology uses a scan of a person's face to create an algorithm that is compared against a database. It can be used to unlock a smartphone or vehicle, pay in , verify identities at bank machines or develop customized fashion or beauty recommendations.

But its use in law enforcement has created the greatest outcry among rights activists because of the potential for errors and mismatches, and because the technology relies on vast databases that may have little or no oversight.

San Francisco's board of supervisors voted earlier this year to ban the use of from law enforcement.

A 2016 study by Georgetown University researchers found about 64 million Americans were in at least one database in "a virtual line-up" even if most had no criminal record, and that there was little knowledge of whether these systems were accurate or unfairly impacted minorities.


Explore further

San Francisco ban highlights facial recognition fears

© 2019 AFP

Citation: Police cam maker nixes facial recognition deployment (2019, June 27) retrieved 22 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-06-police-cam-maker-nixes-facial.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jun 27, 2019
Quote the article
"Police equipment manufacturer Axon said Thursday it decided against deploying facial recognition on its body cameras after an ethics review found the technology "is not yet reliable enough."


That is bull shit, the real reason is in the very next sentence.

Axon, formerly known as Taser and maker of the eponymous nonlethal police weapon, made its decision after a report by its board of directors that came amid intense debate on the use face matching technology for law enforcement and surveillance.


In other words Axion's board of directors saw fit to handicap the police and other law enforcement personal because THEY DECIDED what is ethical for OUR police departments.

Now I am not saying facial recognition is ethical or not. What I am saying is "that decision should be made by the law enforcement personal, not some rich white dudes whose neighborhoods are gated".

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more