Teachers predict pupil success just as well as exam scores

teacher
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

New research from King's College London finds that teacher assessments are equally as reliable as standardised exams at predicting educational success.

The researchers say their findings, published today in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, question whether the benefits of standardised exams outweigh the costs.

Teacher assessments were found to correlate strongly with exam scores across English, mathematics and science from age 7-14, with both measures equally as powerful at predicting later exam success. Teacher assessments predicted around 90% of the differences between pupils in exam performance at GCSE and A-level.

Co-lead researcher Dr. Kaili Rimfeld, from the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), said: 'We have shown for the first time that teacher assessments predict GCSE and A-level results just as well as earlier exam scores. The fact that exam scores correlate so highly with the teacher assessments raises questions about the value of the testing culture that characterises compulsory education in the UK.'

Co-lead researcher Dr. Margherita Malanchini, from the IoPPN and the University of Texas at Austin, said: 'While testing can stimulate both pupils and teachers to focus their efforts, high-stakes exams may shift the educational experience away from learning towards exam performance. For these reasons, we suggest that teacher assessments could be relied on for monitoring progress, instead of exam scores, in particular during earlier school years.'

Previous research has looked at how either exam scores or teacher assessments predict educational success, but not compared the two. The researchers were able to make the comparison by linking data from over 5,000 twin pairs in the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS) with teacher assessments and exam scores in the National Pupil Database.

Previous research from King's College London has established that are the major influence on exam results for GCSEs and A-levels. Using data from TEDS, the researchers showed a strong genetic correlation between teacher assessments and scores, confirming that both measures were identifying the same pupils and largely measuring the same ability.

Teachers in the UK are required to assess their pupils until age 14, and children sit standardised exams throughout school education in the UK, including SATS at age 7 and 11, GCSEs at age 16 and A-levels at age 18.

Dr. Rimfeld said: 'We are not arguing against testing in general, or that teachers should increase their workloads by adding further assessments. On the contrary, we have demonstrated that current methods of are powerful predictors of success, allowing schools to reduce testing and still monitor progress effectively.'

Dr. Malanchini said: 'Our results should inform the debate about testing during both primary and secondary education. Trusting teachers to implement the curriculum and monitor progress could benefit the wellbeing of pupils and teachers and help to bring joy back to the classroom.'

Previous research has suggested high-stakes exams can impact teachers' morale as well as pupils' wellbeing and mental health. The researchers are now looking to study the links between school experiences and mental health among young people.


Explore further

Children's genes uncover potential school league table bias

More information: Kaili Rimfeld et al, Teacher assessments during compulsory education are as reliable, stable and heritable as standardized test scores, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (2019). DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13070
Citation: Teachers predict pupil success just as well as exam scores (2019, May 13) retrieved 23 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-05-teachers-pupil-success-exam-scores.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
702 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 13, 2019
Self-fulfilling prophecy

May 13, 2019
Not necessarily.

One only needs a standard you certify each evaluating human to.
Maybe we could use a standard test for that.

However, the current standard tests have significant bias across the population.

Possibly we could certify the certifiers in a non biased manner.

Silly humans.

Bring on the AI and let the humans certify them.

Hold on....

May 13, 2019
Sadly, I've seen the consequences when unscrupulous teachers 'talked up' pupil assessments. Those kids subsequently struggled with excessive expectations, disrupted classes, failed to reach even their genuine, but lower potential. Worse, they often damaged the kids around them, and certainly 'stole' places from the honestly deserving...
YMMV.

May 14, 2019
Standards have not been standard for a loong time. Only those with IQ speak of it, those without deny it.

May 22, 2019
Good luck then when the teacher doesn't like you, or is racist, or doesn't like your uncle, or ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more