Study: Treats might mask animal intelligence

mice
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Rewards are necessary for learning, but may actually mask true knowledge, finds a new Johns Hopkins University study with rodents and ferrets.

The findings, published May 14 in Nature Communications, show a distinction between knowledge and , and provide insight into how environment can affect the two.

"Most learning research focuses on how humans and other animals learn 'content' or knowledge. Here, we suggest that there are two parallel learning processes: one for content and one for context, or environment. If we can separate how these two pathways work, perhaps we can find ways to improve performance," says Kishore Kuchibhotla, an assistant professor in The Johns Hopkins University's department of psychological and and the study's lead author.

While researchers have known that the presence of reinforcement, or reward, can change how animals behave, it's been unclear exactly how rewards affect learning versus performance.

An example of the difference between learning and performance, Kuchibhotla explains, is the difference between a student studying and knowing the answers at home, and a student demonstrating that knowledge on a test at school.

Researchers trained mice to lick a tube for a reward during a 'target' tone and not lick during a 'foil' tone. After two weeks of training, expert mice perform at high accuracy in the presence of the lick tube. Credit: Johns Hopkins University/Kuchibhotla Lab

"What we know at any given time can be different than what we show; the ability to access that knowledge in the right environment is what we're interested in," he says.

To investigate what animals know in hopes of better understanding learning, Kuchibhotla and the research team trained , rats and ferrets on a series of tasks, and measured how accurately they performed the tasks with and without rewards.

After only a few days of training, however, mice completed this task at chance levels in the presence of the lick tube (~50%). They licked to both the target and foil tones without discriminating. Credit: The Johns Hopkins University/Kuchibhotla Lab

For the first experiment, the team trained mice to lick for water through a lick tube after hearing one tone, and to not lick after hearing a different, unrewarded tone. It takes mice two weeks to learn this in the presence of the water reward. At a time point early in learning, around days 3-5, the mice performed the task at chance levels (about 50%) when the lick tube/reward was present. When the team removed the lick tube entirely on these early days, however, the mice performed the task at more than 90% accuracy. The mice, therefore, seemed to understand the task many days before they expressed knowledge in the presence of a reward.

To confirm this finding with other tasks and animals, the team also had mice press a lever for water when they heard a certain tone; prompted rats to look for food in a cup if they heard a tone, but not if a light appeared before the tone; had rats press a lever for sugar water when a light was presented before a tone; had rats push lever for sugar water when they heard a certain tone, and prompted ferrets to differentiate between two different sounds for water. In all experiments, the animals performed better when rewards weren't available.

On this early day in learning, researchers then played the same 'target' and 'foil' tones but without a lick tube present. Surprisingly, mice licked to the target tone and not to the foil tone with >90% accuracy. Credit: The Johns Hopkins University/Kuchibhotla Lab

"Rewards, it seems, help improve learning incrementally, but can mask the knowledge animals have actually attained, particularly early in learning," says Kuchibhotla. Furthermore, the finding that all animals' performance improved across the board without rewards, suggest that variability in learning rates may be due to differences in the animals' sensitivity to context rather than differences in intelligence.

The dissociation between learning and performance, the researchers suggest, may someday help us isolate the root causes of poor performance. While the study involved only rodents and ferrets, Kuchibhotla says it may be possible to someday help and humans alike better access content when they need it if the right mechanisms within the brain can be identified and manipulated.

For humans, this could help those with Alzheimer's Disease maintain lucidity for longer periods of time and improve testing environments for schoolchildren.


Explore further

Rats trail behind shrews, monkeys, and humans in visual problem solving

More information: Kishore V. Kuchibhotla et al, Dissociating task acquisition from expression during learning reveals latent knowledge, Nature Communications (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10089-0
Journal information: Nature Communications

Citation: Study: Treats might mask animal intelligence (2019, May 14) retrieved 24 May 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-05-mask-animal-intelligence.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
152 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more