Carbon-negative power generation for China

coal
Credit: Grant Wilson/public domain

If we're going to limit global temperature increases to 2 degrees above pre-industrial levels, as laid out in the Paris Climate Agreement, it's going to take a lot more than a transition to carbon-neutral energy sources such as wind and solar. It's going to require carbon-negative technologies, including energy sources that actually reduce carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere.

While most and activists agree that -negative solutions will be needed to meet the terms of the Paris Agreement goal, so far most of these solutions have been viewed as impractical in the near term, especially for large, coal-reliant countries like China.

Now, researchers from the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and the Harvard-China Project on Energy, Economy and Environment, in collaboration with colleagues from Tsinghua University in Beijing and other institutions in China, Australia and the U.S., have analyzed technical and economic viability for China to move towards carbon-negative electric power generation.

The research is published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"This paper is making a bold suggestion that not only can China move towards negative carbon power but that it can do so in an economically competitive way," said Michael McElroy, the Gilbert Butler Professor of Environmental Studies at Harvard and a senior co-author of the paper.

"The system we describe not only offers a carbon-negative alternative to generate electricity in the long run but also brings significant near-term co-benefit to reducing air pollution in China," said Xi Lu, Associate Professor in the School of Environment at Tsinghua University and first author of the paper. Lu is also a former SEAS graduate student and postdoctoral fellow.

The strategy McElroy, Lu and their colleagues lay out involves the combination of two forms of green energy: coal-bioenergy gasification and carbon capture and storage.

Bioenergy one of the most important tools in the carbon-negative toolbox.

Bioenergy comes from the best CO2 scrubbers on the planet—plants. As most of us learned in grade school, plants use photosynthesis to convert CO2 into organic carbon and oxygen. The carbon stored in plants can be converted back into energy through combustion (a.k.a., fire); fermentation, as in the production of ethanol; or through a process known as gasification, which converts carbon-rich materials into carbon monoxide, hydrogen and carbon dioxide for fuels and industrial chemicals.

The process of converting biomass into energy and then capturing and storing the waste CO2 is one of the most talked-about strategies for negative carbon power. It's known as BECCS, bioenergy with and storage. The problem is, in most applications BECCS is not very efficient and requires massive amounts of land to grow the plants needed to power the planet, which would likely result in global food and water shortages.

But what if there was a way to make the process more practical and efficient?

Lu, McElroy and their international team turned to an unlikely solution for green energy: coal.

"If you try to do this with biofuel alone, it's not very effective," McElroy said. "The addition of coal provides an energy source that is really important. If you combine biofuel with coal and gasify the mixture, you can essentially develop a pure source of hydrogen in the process."

By modeling different ratios of biofuel to coal, the researchers found that as long as at least 35 percent of the mixture is biomass and the waste carbon is captured, the power generated would actually reduce CO2 in the atmosphere. At that ratio, the researchers found that the levelized cost of electricity would be no more than 9.2 cents per kilowatt hour. A carbon price of approximately $52 per ton would make this system cost-competitive with current coal-fired powerplants in China.

A key component to this strategy is the use of crop residue—the remains of plants after fields have been harvested—as biofuel.

Seasonal agricultural fires, when farmers set fire to their fields to clear stubble after a harvest, are a major source of air pollution in China. Collecting that stubble and using it as biofuels would not only reduce CO2 but significantly improve air quality in the country. Gasification also allows easier removal of air pollutants from the waste stream.

The researchers acknowledge that developing a system to collect the biomass and deliver it to powerplants will take time but they argue that the system doesn't need to be implemented all at once.

"Because we've investigated the whole range of coal-to-biomass ratios, we've demonstrated how China could move incrementally towards an increasingly carbon-negative energy source," said Chris P. Nielsen, Executive Director of the Harvard-China Project and co-author of the study. "First, small amounts of biofuel could be used to reduce the net positive carbon emissions. Then, the system could grow toward carbon neutrality and eventually to a carbon-negative system. You don't have to accomplish everything from the get-go."

"This study provides critical information for policy makers seeking to implement carbon-negative opportunities in China," said Lu.


Explore further

Carbon capture on power stations burning woodchips is not the green gamechanger many think it is

More information: Xi Lu el al., "Gasification of coal and biomass as a net carbon-negative power source for environment-friendly electricity generation in China," PNAS (2019). www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1812239116
Citation: Carbon-negative power generation for China (2019, April 8) retrieved 19 June 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-04-carbon-negative-power-china.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
260 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Apr 08, 2019
How about Mangrove Tree Forests over Oceans in their Photic zones i.e in Oceans from surface to a depth of 200 m (The average ocean depth is 2.3 miles)?
https://oceanserv...ves.html
https://en.wikipe...Mangrove

Apr 08, 2019
How about Mangrove Tree Forests over Oceans in their Photic zones i.e in Oceans from surface to a depth of 200 m (The average ocean depth is 2.3 miles)?
https://oceanserv...ov/facts
Existing information on mangroves is limited in that it either provides a snapshot of extent or covers only limited geographical areas.
https://www.iucn....ves.html

Apr 08, 2019
the chinese won't sign any nonsensical paris accord. . c02 tax policy is sheer theft. the chinese won't open their wallet to the 'paris accord' so the eurocentric regulators can steal money. they have the best new Electric grid in the world. they europeans would regulate it out of existence if they could. progress comes from directed competition, not degenerate regulation.

Apr 08, 2019
Now if only the Chinese would stop tolerating the air pollution from their 5th century agricultural practices and coal-fired electric plants.

Good luck with this; they're not going to change until they have a billion people dying from their stupid practices and maybe not even then if they can come up with a good excuse.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more