Chances for life expand when passing stars push binaries together

March 6, 2019, Royal Astronomical Society
A NASA graphic showing an Earth-sized planet inside, within, and outside of the habitable zone around a star. Credit: NASA

Planetary systems can be harsh environments in their early history. The young worlds orbit suns in stellar nurseries, clusters of stars where violent encounters are commonplace. None of this makes it easy for life to get going, but now astronomers at the University of Sheffield find one positive of this tumultuous period. A model developed by undergraduate student Bethany Wootton and Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Fellow Dr. Richard Parker looks at how the habitable zone—the region around a star where the temperature allows liquid water to exist—changes around pairs of stars, so-called binary systems.

The two scientists discovered that an encounter with a passing third star may squeeze the binary pair together, expanding the in the process. Their results appear in a new paper in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

The habitable zone, sometimes called the 'Goldilocks zone' as the temperature is not too hot and not too cold, is thought to be essential for the development of on a planet. If a planet lies outside this zone, then the formation of the complex molecules needed for life is less likely to happen.

Around one third of stellar systems in our galaxy are thought to be made up of two or more , and this fraction is much higher when stars are young. If these stars are a relatively large distance apart, the size of the Goldilocks zone around each star is governed by the radiation from the individual star. If the two stars are closer, the size of the Goldilocks zone increases because each star feels additional warmth from the other and this increases the likelihood of a planet being located in the right place for life to develop.

Artist's impression of life on a planet in orbit around a binary star system, visible as two suns in the sky. Credit: Mark Garlick

Wootton and Parker looked at how this changed in stellar nurseries. They used to model the interactions between in these clusters, calculating how these encounters affected the binary pairs. In a typical stellar nursery with 350 binaries, the two researchers found that 20 would have their stars squeezed together, and their Goldilocks zones then expanded.

In a few cases, the habitable zones of widely separated stars actually overlapped, further increasing the prospect of any planets in orbit around one or both of the stars being in the right place for life to develop.

Wootton comments: "The search for life elsewhere in the universe is one of the most fundamental questions in , and we need every bit of evidence we can find to help answer it."

A diagram of two stars in a binary system, before and after an encounter with a third passing star. The stars are the yellow/orange dots (the yellow star is the same mass as our Sun, the orange star is just over half of the Sun's mass) and the habitable zones are shown in blue. The 'narrow' habitable zone is the most pessimistic estimate for where water can exist as a liquid, and the cyan habitable zone is the most optimistic estimate. The diagram shows one star in an orbit, following the black path, around the other, and the size and shape of the orbit changes after the encounter. In this encounter the two stars have moved closer together, and both stars feel the extra warmth from each other. This has the effect of increasing the size of the habitable zones, especially around the lower mass star, and sometimes the habitable zones overlap. The grey dashed line shows the maximum distance a planet can be from the star and still remain on a stable orbit. Credit: Richard Parker / Bethany Wootton / University of Sheffield
"Our model suggests that there are more binary systems where planets sit in Goldilocks zones than we thought, increasing the prospects for life. So those worlds beloved of science fiction writers—where two suns shine in their skies above alien life—look a lot more likely now."

The next steps for this research are to use more computer models to understand whether the negative processes a young star experiences are outweighed by the positives. Parker and his research team are currently exploring whether internal heating within the Earth happens because our young Sun was born close to a supernova explosion of a massive star; this explosion would be catastrophic for life on Earth today, but may provide the necessary conditions for life to have developed on Earth in the first place.

Explore further: X-rays could sterilise alien planets in otherwise habitable zones

More information: "Enlarging habitable zones around binary stars in hostile environments", Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters (2019). DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly238

Related Stories

Hunting for hidden life on worlds orbiting old, red stars

May 16, 2016

All throughout the universe, there are stars in varying phases and ages. The oldest detected Kepler planets (exoplanets found using NASA's Kepler telescope) are about 11 billion years old, and the planetary diversity suggests ...

Goldilocks moons

January 16, 2012

The search for extraterrestrial life outside our Solar System is currently focused on extrasolar planets within the ‘habitable zones’ of exoplanetary systems around stars similar to the Sun. Finding Earth-like planets ...

Recommended for you

Scientists solve mystery shrouding oldest animal fossils

March 25, 2019

Scientists from The Australian National University (ANU) have discovered that 558 million-year-old Dickinsonia fossils do not reveal all of the features of the earliest known animals, which potentially had mouths and guts.

Earth's deep mantle flows dynamically

March 25, 2019

As ancient ocean floors plunge over 1,000 km into the Earth's deep interior, they cause hot rock in the lower mantle to flow much more dynamically than previously thought, finds a new UCL-led study.

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rrwillsj
5 / 5 (1) Mar 06, 2019
As this article is written, I am baffled by the conclusion that a binary star system increases the opportunity for larger habitable zones. when a third star pushes the two stars closer together?

Considering that a random passage could just as easily pulled the original binary stars apart? Yet another blow to the chances of planets remaining habitable long enough for Life to originate & survive to flourish.

May be I missed something?
A binary system, may have planets orbiting each star?
Or perhaps an orbit wide enough to encircle both stars together?

I would have thought that shoving the two stars together would have decreased the habitable slot for the other star's planets?
Perhaps they meant that a wide-orbiting planet encircling both stars closed together, would increase vthe goldilocks zone for the outlier planet?

Now I will have to look up the original paper & see if I can figure out what I failed to figure on. (grumble)
Parsec
not rated yet Mar 06, 2019
Personally I have always believed that the gravitational instability caused by the many-body interactions would be vastly increased by having suns too close to the planet's orbits. Certainly this should be the case for starts close enough to affect the habitability zones. In fact, how could a planet's orbit be stable for geological timescales so close to two different massive objects?
wduckss
not rated yet Mar 07, 2019
Goldilocks zone= old misconceptions "blind" scientists.
Goldilocks zone are of:
Inner edge 0,38 (arXiv:1304.3714)- 0,99 AU (arXiv:1303.2649.),
Outer edge 1,01 (doi:10.1016/0019-1035(79)90141-6.) – 10 AU (doi:10.1016/0019-1035(79)90141-6.).
Venus is located in the habitable zone and there is no water and life, the same is true for Mars. Both planets are in a "habitable zone".
The possibility of creating life comes with the rotation of the body and the corresponding mass, within the thermal deformation (http://www.scienc...80603.13 )...
rrwillsj
not rated yet Mar 07, 2019
parse & ducks, I agree with both of you.
Sigh...

Another spate of evidence for a Stochastic Universe versus my Theory of Stupid Design.
dang blasted hooligan drunken deities! Get off my lawn!

Oh Goddess Trickster Coyote... Why do you torment us so?
Elmo_McGillicutty
not rated yet Mar 10, 2019
Modern science, the science of contradiction. Life is the only singularity that's ever been detected.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.