Microalgae as natural detector of environmental safety

Microalgae as natural detector of environmental safety
Microalgae -- Nannochloropsis sp. Credit: CSIRO, https://www.csiro.au/

An international group of toxicologists, including experts from the Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU), report that unicellular microalgae, the most common microorganisms on Earth and an important part of the food chain for more developed organisms, serve as an effective biomarker of environmental pollution. Microalgae quickly respond to chemical contamination of the environment by oxidative stress. The study was published in Current Opinion in Toxicology.

Scientists explain that environmental leads to the formation of (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) inside the of all living . As soon as ROS appears in the cells, the body activates defense systems to resist oxidative (oxygen) stress. The very presence of ROS inside the cells, as well as oxygen-induced damage of the cells and antioxidants to repair them, can serve as an indicator of environmental problems.

"Aquatic organisms are widely used in toxicology and ecotoxicology due to their sensitivity to pollution, ubiquity and simplicity of cultivation. Among them, occupy a special place, as the most common form of organisms in the Global Ocean. They occupy the initial level in the food chain and are responsible for more than half of the photosynthetic activity on the planet. In case of damage to the microalgae population, the consequences will be noticeable at higher levels of the food chain, since they feed more than 70 percent of biomass. Using unicellular microalgae, we can quickly determine the degree of environmental pollution," Says FEFU Vice-President for Research, Kirill Golokhvast, Ph.D., Doctor of Biological Sciences.

The researchers note that the diversity of antioxidants produced in the body under the influence of various foreign chemical elements entering it—xenobiotics—as well as the different sensitivity of organisms to different xenobiotics complicate the method of assessing of the environmental pollution by using an indicator of oxidative stress.

However, scientists propose to use the biomarkers of the oxidative stress—antioxidants—in microalgae as an indicator of environmental pollution. The study provides examples of how microalgae react to the most common chemical pollutants (xenobiotics).

Toxicologists say that the most commonly used indicators in ecotoxicology as growth rate, biomass buildup, as well as morphological changes of the cell are insufficient to understand the toxicity mechanisms of xenobiotics.

The fact is that the defense mechanism of antioxidant production is the very first to fight free radicals. The amount of antioxidants in the cell increases when the production of free radicals—ROS, XRF—expands.

It's important to note that free radicals are formed in the living organisms even when in a normal, non-polluted environment. Being a product of cells vital activity, they are involved in various complex biological processes and normally are neutralized by antioxidants. If the first defense mechanism in the cell fails and the number of exceeds the number of , other defense mechanisms take their turn. However, if they are disorganized, occurs when increased levels of ROS and RNS can lead to the cell's DNA, proteins, and fats damage and even cause the death of a cell.

More information: K.S. Pikula et al, Oxidative stress and its biomarkers in microalgal ecotoxicology, Current Opinion in Toxicology (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2018.12.006

Provided by Far Eastern Federal University

Citation: Microalgae as natural detector of environmental safety (2019, February 20) retrieved 30 November 2022 from https://phys.org/news/2019-02-microalgae-natural-detector-environmental-safety.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

What are antioxidants? And are they truly good for us?


Feedback to editors