California nixes plans for high-speed LA-SF rail line

A model of the high speed "Fuxing" bullet train made by Chinese rail giant CRRC is on display at Innotrans, the railwa
A model of the high speed "Fuxing" bullet train made by Chinese rail giant CRRC is on display at Innotrans, the railway industry's largest trade fair, in Berlin on September 19, 2018.

California Governor Gavin Newsom announced on Tuesday that he was abandoning plans to build a high-speed rail line between Los Angeles and San Francisco, citing the high cost and the time it would take.

"Let's be real," the newly elected Newsom said in his first State of the State address. "The project, as currently planned, would cost too much and take too long.

"There's been too little oversight and not enough transparency."

Newsom said he planned to concentrate instead on completing a high-speed rail link between the central and more rural towns of Merced and Bakersfield to reinvigorate the region's economy.

"I know that some critics will say this is a 'train to nowhere'," he said. "But that's wrong and offensive.

"The people of the Central Valley endure the worst air pollution in America as well as some of the longest commutes," he added. "And they have suffered too many years of neglect from policymakers here in Sacramento. They deserve better."

Plans for an LA-San Francisco bullet train had been backed by Newsom's predecessors Jerry Brown and Arnold Schwarzenegger and the line was expected to be completed in 2033, years behind schedule.

The rail service was intended to decongest key airports and highways that have reached saturation points in the most populous and richest state in the nation.

The 520-mile journey would take less than three hours.

The project, however, has run into repeated delays and legal challenges. An initial estimated cost of about $40 billion when voters first approved the project in 2008 has ballooned to $77 billion.

Construction on the began in 2015 in Fresno under Phase One, and since then crews have been working on 119-mile (191-kilometer) stretch in the Central Valley.


Explore further

California bullet train staff recommend German operator

© 2019 AFP

Citation: California nixes plans for high-speed LA-SF rail line (2019, February 12) retrieved 17 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-02-california-nixes-high-speed-la-sf-rail.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
40 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Feb 12, 2019
All he needs to do is call the bimbo barista, AOC, she can get it built and cost is of no consequence. She'll just wiggle her socialist nose and create the money out of thin air.

Feb 12, 2019
cantdrive85, rotfl!

Feb 12, 2019
So basically you agree we're not as good as Japan or France.

Noted.

Feb 12, 2019
Da, you don't understand the demography of the US. In Japan the bullet train debut linked Tokyo to Osaka, and there are approx. 80 million people living in that corridor of 300 miles (500km). And the train links with uncountable number of mass transit systems (trains, subways, buses, etc). Compare that with almost 400 miles between Sacramento and LA with 1/4 of the population, and comparitively almost no other mass transit connections, and you get a bogus project only supported by left-wingers.

Feb 12, 2019
Add that to other concepts like, in Japan most companies in Tokyo and Osaka do not allow employees to drive to work, whereas in the US cars are the default mode of transportation. And then there comes another nail into the coffin.

Feb 12, 2019
The French have it. The Japanese have it.

You're too stupid to have it. Simple as that.

Feb 13, 2019
Da Schneib, the French and the Japanese also have cars and airplanes because they're not stupid enough to think that high speed rail will replace them. And their high speed rail is heavily subsidized by taxpayers. There is no place on earth where high speed rail is commercially viable. Contrast that with all the commercial airlines and freight-hauling rail systems that are profitable. Profitable, incidentally, means efficient. High speed rail is neither.

Feb 13, 2019
Sorry, I misspoke. One line of France's TGV, from Paris to Lyon is actually (barely) profitable and its margin is being shrunk by airline competitors. The Shinkansen in Japan took a decade to become profitable and still is. As Bart_A noted, Japan has a unique and serendipitous combination of geography and demographics that contribute to the success of high speed rail; something no other country has duplicated.

Feb 13, 2019
Also, the former Japan National Rail Company that built the initial Shinkansen lines was running massive deficits and was broken up into several private companies in 1987. The Hokkaido line of the Shinkansen is unprofitable but the rest make a profit today.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more