This computer program makes pharma patents airtight

January 17, 2019, Cell Press
his graphical abstract illustrates how by identifying and keeping track of key disconnections essential to patent protected syntheses, a retrosynthetic computer program can autonomously design synthetic routes, ''navigating around'' previously published or patented approaches. Credit: Molga et al./Chem

Routes to making life-saving medications and other pharmaceutical compounds are among the most carefully protected trade secrets in global industry. Building on recent work programming computers to identify synthetic pathways leading to pharmaceutically complex molecules, researchers in Poland and South Korea have unveiled computerized methods to suggest only synthetic strategies that bypass patent-protected aspects of essential drugs. Their work appears January 17 in the journal Chem.

"When we started this project, I was somewhat skeptical that the machine would find any viable synthetic alternatives—after all, these are blockbuster drugs worth gazillions of dollars, and I was sure that the respective companies had covered the space so densely that no loopholes remained," says senior author Bartosz Grzybowski, a professor of chemistry at the Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (South Korea) and the Polish Academy of Sciences and the lead developer of the organic synthesis software Chematica. "It turns out that the loopholes are there, and we can find new retrosynthetic pathways that circumvent the patents entirely."

Those pharmaceutical patents protect the company's while also preventing competitor companies from using certain key synthetic solutions—developed painstakingly by experiment to maximize yield, increase purity, and reduce costs—when attempting to produce desired compounds. To get to viable unpatented options, the researchers "froze" challenging portions of each target molecule, forcing the computer to substitute unconventional yet chemically plausible approaches on the basis of mechanistic rules. They tested their system out on three notable commercial medicines with different chemical hurdles: linezolid, a last-resort antibiotic; sitagliptin, an antidiabetic drug; and panobinostat, a multiple myeloma treatment.

In each case, when allowed to run without constraints, the program recommended the commercial syntheses. But when even a few atoms and bonds were designated as untouchable, it innovated by applying Chematica's existing functions to propose new plans that neatly avoided those already patented. "By algorithmically locating the key bonds on which patents hinge and propagating them down Chematica's retrosynthetic trees, we can generate synthetic solutions from alternative yet economical starting materials, achieving a real practical impact," Grzybowski says.

Chematica's patent-dodging abilities could also alter how chemists approach intellectual property and patent law. For example, machine-aided searches could be used to restrict many different parts of a target molecule, lumping radically different syntheses into a single airtight patent. According to Grzybowski, however, such a patent would not necessarily stay loophole-free forever, thanks to the likely future experimental discovery of novel reactions driving chemical knowledge forward through healthy competition.

Overall, the researchers hope that their software will aid pharmaceutical companies in better protecting their intellectual property and, simultaneously, will help accelerate research and development in organic chemistry by supplying synthetic routes that differ from standard approaches. "This work illustrates the benefits of pushing chemists to think algorithmically and asking computer scientists to grasp key chemical concepts, delivering chemical artificial intelligence results that matter beyond the confines of academia," adds co-author Piotr Dittwald, a research fellow with training in mathematics and computer science.

Explore further: Chemists test Chematica's ability to generate synthetic routes

More information: Chem, Molga et al.: "Navigating around patented routes by preserving specific motifs along computer-planned retrosynthetic pathways" https://www.cell.com/chem/fulltext/S2451-9294(18)30567-9 , DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.12.004

Related Stories

'Google on steroids': Scientists create chemical brain

August 22, 2012

Northwestern University scientists have connected 250 years of organic chemical knowledge into one giant computer network -- a chemical Google on steroids. This "immortal chemist" will never retire and take away its knowledge ...

Medical charity warns India over patent rules

January 21, 2015

Doctors without Borders on Wednesday warned the Indian government not to bow to US pressure to amend patent regulations that allow millions access to affordable medicines, ahead of a visit by President Barack Obama.

Recommended for you

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

V4Vendicar
not rated yet Jan 17, 2019
"Intellectual property" is an illegitimate concept that is impossible to enforce.

Those who defend the concept are the enemies of free thought, and liberty.
eachus
not rated yet Jan 17, 2019
"Intellectual property" is an illegitimate concept that is impossible to enforce.

Those who defend the concept are the enemies of free thought, and liberty.


Don't worry. The software involved will eliminate patents on (existing) production methods. IANAL, and it will take most of a decade, but it is coming. A new and less expensive way to manufacture a give product or precursor? Have at it. Patents on chemicals not found in the body--or in some other existing lifeform? Again, gets you past the first hurdle (novelty) on patents.

The fight by patent attorneys trying to patent software has gone on for decades, and there are still so many silly patents issued, that the patent office had to put in a process to deal with "You have got to be kidding me, right?" patents. (These typically involve software that is not in the patent history that the patent clerks usually search. Decades ago the Patent Office wouldn't even accept software based applications.)
eachus
not rated yet Jan 17, 2019
Of course, additive manufacturing, AKA 3d-printing, is going to induce another collapse in what is patentable. If I make a replacement widget for some machine using 3d-manufacturing, to get it faster than ordering from the manufacturer, am I violating the manufacturer's patents?

The printer ink cartridge business is likely to litigate this issue, and I don't think that the printer manufacturers will be happy with the results--unless they get put out of business by 3-d printed 2-d printers. ;-)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.