We may soon be able to see the first supergiant stars in the universe

We may soon be able to see the first supergiant stars in the universe
Credit: NSF

We need to talk about the dark ages. No, not those dark ages after the fall of the western Roman Empire. The cosmological dark ages. The time in our universe, billions of years ago, before the formation of the first stars. And we need to talk about the cosmic dawn: the birth of those first stars, a tumultuous epoch that completely reshaped the face the cosmos into its modern form.

Those first may have been completely unlike anything we see in the present universe. And we may, if we're lucky, be on the cusp of seeing them for the first time.

The First Black Holes

First we need to set up a little mystery.

We all know by now how come to be. A , somewhere north of eight times the mass of our sun, lives its brief but predictable life, fusing hydrogen into helium. Then it runs out of hydrogen and starts fusing helium. Then it runs out of helium and starts burning heavier stuff, making its way up the periodic table until it hits iron. Fusing iron sucks energy instead of releasing energy, and so nothing can stop the terrible gravitational collapse of the star. Everything gets squeezed down into a tiny volume, and now you have a black hole.

Over time that black hole can meet and consume other black holes, or just suckle on the surrounding interstellar material, increasing in beefiness all the while. Given enough time and enough food, the black hole can swell to become a giant – a supermassive giant. These creatures lurk in the hearts of galaxies, and easily tip the scales at a whopping million-plus times the mass of our sun.

New material continues to fall in – just because the black hole is gigantic doesn't mean its hunger is sated – and as the gas falls into the gaping maw of the black hole, it compresses and heats up, glowing brighter than a galaxy's worth of stars. This object goes by several names – quasar, blazar, active galactic nucleus – but they all mean the same thing: a giant black hole is feeding.

That's all well and good and slightly terrifying, but here's a problem. We see quasars in the very distant universe, which means we see quasars in the very young universe, when it was not even a billion years old (yes, that's young for a universe). And the process I just described above (forming big stars, letting them live and die, creating a black hole, letting it feed to gargantuan proportions) takes a lot longer than a billion years.

How did our universe produce monster black holes so quickly?

Fossils of an Ancient Age

If the usual star->black hole->quasar route doesn't seem to work in the early universe, it's about time to consider alternatives. Shortcuts. Faster routes to creating the big black holes that our observations demand exist. And the quickest way to make a supermassive black hole is to start with a supermassive star.

How supermassive? How about 100,000 solar masses, is that big enough for you?

Stars like that simply don't exist in today's universe. If you try to cram all that stuff into a compact enough volume to turn it into a star, interactions and instabilities will fragment it like so much crumbling cookie dough in your hands, forming lots of normal stars instead of a single monster one. This is why we think stars over 100 solar masses are, while possible, exceedingly rare today.

But the era of the Cosmic Dawn was a different time. For one, no heavy elements existed yet – the nuclear forges hadn't been operating for long enough to pollute the interstellar waterways. Radiation from those extra elements are a great way to cool down a gas cloud and trigger its fragmentation into smaller chunks. Second, the young cosmos was flooded with high-energy ultraviolet radiation from the sudden birth of other, smaller stars. This radiation breaks apart molecular hydrogen, another key pathway for cooling down and fragmenting a giant gas cloud.

So while again rare, conditions may have been just right at the end of the cosmic to form giant and even supergiant stars: enough material could have flowed into a small enough volume without splitting apart, giving birth to a huge star.

These giant stars would've led short lives and collapsed directly to form big black holes, shortcutting the usual route to making quasars.

The Cosmic Dawn Breaks

This sounds like a great idea, but in science great ideas need to confront the evidence before we can start believing in them. In this case, it would be pretty handy to have a photograph of one of these gargantuan stars before they turned into black holes and then into quasars.

That's tough, though, because the age when these stars lived and died is far away from us. And those stars, while still giant by stellar standards, were very very small, making them even harder to spot at these extreme distances.

But for once we might get a lucky break. Recent simulations of these strange stars reveal that they are surprisingly cool, having a surface temperature somewhere between 6,000-8000 Kelvin, giving their surfaces an intense red glow. And due to their incredible bulk, they are very bright, bursting with light at an intensity of ten billion suns. This combination of sheer brightness and deep redness means that they are potentially visible in infrared wavelengths for some upcoming missions.

Missions like the James Webb Space Telescope, an instrument specifically designed to go hunting for the first stars. If supergiant stars existed in those long-gone eras, and if some of them were lucky enough to survive into the era where their brethren already started transforming into monster black holes, putting them just a tad closer in view, there's a chance we can directly take their picture.

What a sight that would be.

Explore further

Image: Black hole bounty captured in the center of the Milky Way

Citation: We may soon be able to see the first supergiant stars in the universe (2018, November 29) retrieved 18 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-11-supergiant-stars-universe.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Nov 29, 2018
If we believe that our World has started sometimes ago we are still in the position to decide which hypothesis, Lemaître's or Gamow's was closer to reality. There is an opinion that the problems in the standard cosmology could be solved by adjusting of details. Our suggestion is that we have to go back to the conceptions and use the observations accumulated since.

Nov 29, 2018
Are these supergiant population III stars?

Looks like a 'just so' story to me, like religionists in the past debating the size of God's feet and whether or not he has ten toes (ie. an intelligent sounding hypothesis based on a very large web of unsubstantiated assumptions).

Dec 10, 2018
I'm confused about the color of these hypothesized stars. Red? Is that because the hotter activity in the star is deeper within, and the corona is just far too large to sustain a nice, tight blue color?
I imagine, if such stars used to exist, they resembled Betelgeuse with it's misshapen, potato-like lumps.
Wouldn't such huge stars immediately collapse? Considering the largest stars today have a maximum projected lifespan of only a few tens of millions of years. And these are around 300M or less stars. A 100,000M+ star should barely exist before collapsing, even in the densely packed baby universe...it seems to me.
I'm super excited at any rate to see these Pop III stars. If they even existed. Or even resemble anything we would recognize.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more