Hydropower, innovations and avoiding international dam shame

Hydropower, innovations and avoiding international dam shame
This dam in the Brazilian Amazon is the third largest in the world at 11 GW in 2016. Credit: Laura Castro-Diaz

For sweeping drama, it's hard to beat hydropower from dams—a renewable source of electricity that helped build much of the developed world. Yet five scientists from Michigan State University (MSU) say that behind roaring cascades is a legacy of underestimated costs and overestimated value.

The developing world can—and must—turn to better ways to generate hydropower for industry and livelihoods. The case is outlined in "Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century" in this week's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"This article identifies that for hydropower to continue to make a contribution to sustainable energy it needs to consider from the outset the true , social, environmental and cultural that may be involved, and include those in the pricing of the infrastructure, including the eventual removal of the dam, rather than pass those on to the public in 30 years," said Emilio Moran, John A. Hannah Distinguished Professor of Geography, Environment and Spatial Sciences.

"The benefits of energy from dams no longer outweigh the social and that damming up rivers brings about."

From 1920 to 1970, dams were a boom in North America and Europe. Yet nowadays, more dams are being removed in North America and Europe than are being built.

Turns out dams had a dark side. They disrupt the natural ecology of rivers, damage forests and biodiversity, release large amounts of greenhouse gases, as well as displace thousands of people while disrupting food systems, water quality and agriculture.

And to top it off, the power generated often doesn't go to the places bearing the ecological burdens.

Hydropower, innovations and avoiding international dam shame
This in-stream river turbine can generate power for a community without the major disruptions that come with traditional dams Credit: Prepared by Raul Quispe-Abad and Norbert Müller

The MSU team—geographers, social scientists, hydrologists and engineers—examined how the needs of a changing world can be better met than damming more rivers. Yet they note that an estimated 3,700 dams that produce more than one megawatt are either planned or under construction primarily in developing countries.

The danger: a large-scale destruction of the natural world, one likely exacerbated by looming climate change.

"The human costs of are no less important," the paper notes. "The social, behavioral, cultural, economic, and political disruption that populations near dams face are routinely underestimated."

Moreover, dams typically have a finite lifespan—usually around 30 years, making them fall short as a long-term sustainable strategy.

The group notes that it's not that the rivers aren't a valuable source of power. The potential is there to be released in less intrusive technologies. Innovative technologies that don't require damming a river or resettling populations stand to transform the hydropower sector. The technologies, they say, would need to be accompanied by both environmental and social impact assessments with teeth—meaning damning assessments could stop a dam.

One option is instream turbine technology , a less intrusive way to tap into hydropower without the major disruptions of dams.

"Our team is working on alternatives to hydropower generation, such as in-stream turbines that do not involve damming up the river, but produce energy for local communities, maintain a healthy river ecology, and does not involve resettlement and other social costs," Moran said. "Our goal is no less than transforming the sector."


Explore further

Study examines pros and cons of hydropower

More information: Emilio F. Moran el al., "Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century," PNAS (2018). www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1809426115
Citation: Hydropower, innovations and avoiding international dam shame (2018, November 5) retrieved 20 June 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-11-hydropower-international-shame.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
109 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Nov 05, 2018
The picture caption says that an in-stream river turbine can generate power for a community without the major disruptions that come with traditional dams. Anyone who cares to get the Bernoulli equation out of the bottom drawer will quickly determine that this is false. There is not much energy at all in the flow velocity of the water in a stream and use of spaced turbines would access only a small part of even that. On the other hand, a dam accesses all the potential energy from the build up of water behind it which is then efficiently directed through turbines.
Question: Why are there so many dams and so few in stream turbines ?
Answer: Because in stream turbines produce only a few percent of the power you can get from a dam.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more