Cigarettes have a significant impact on the environment, not just health

Credit: CC0 Public Domain

A new report shows that the six trillion cigarettes produced yearly impact the environment through climate change, water and land use, and toxicity.

The devastating of the on human health is well known. However, a new systematically outlines for the first time the substantial impact of the tobacco industry on the environment.

The report, authored by scientists from Imperial College London, is launched today at a meeting of the World Health Organisation Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

Finite resources

These impacts include climate change from energy and fuel consumption, and soil depletion, and acidification. The global cultivation of tobacco requires substantial land use, water consumption, pesticides and labour – all finite resources that might be put to better use.

Globally, the cultivation of 32.4 Million tonnes (Mt) of green tobacco, used for the production of 6.48 Mt of dry tobacco in the six trillion cigarettes manufactured worldwide in 2014, contributes almost 84 Mt CO2 emissions to – approximately 0.2% of the global total.

Professor Nick Voulvoulis, from the Centre for Environmental Policy at Imperial, said: "The environmental impacts of cigarette smoking, from cradle to grave, add significant pressures to the planet's increasingly scarce resources and fragile ecosystems. Tobacco reduces our quality of life as it competes for resources with commodities valuable to livelihoods and development across the world."

Energy intensive production

'Processing' – the curing of tobacco leaves to produce dry tobacco – is highly energy intensive, using coal or wood burning that contributes to greenhouse gas emissions and deforestation. Tobacco production also uses more than 22 billion tonnes of water.

The transport and manufacture of cigarettes, as well as their final use and disposal, also use more resources and leave further waste.

The world's top cigarette consuming country – China – harvests over 3 Mt of tobacco leaves using over 1.5 million hectares of arable land and significant fresh water resources – while habitats suffer from water scarcity and nearly 134 million of its people are undernourished.

Crop yields

The report compares the impact of tobacco against other crops that typically require fewer inputs. Moreover, the yield of these crops is in many cases considerably higher than that of tobacco. For example, in Zimbabwe a hectare of land could produce 19 times more potatoes than the 1–1.2 tonnes of tobacco currently cultivated.

The evidence also suggests that growing alternative crops is better for farmers and their families, as child labour remains a major issue in tobacco production.

Almost 90% of all tobacco production is concentrated in the developing world – of the top ten tobacco producing countries, nine are developing and four are low-income food-deficit countries (LIFDCs), including India, Zimbabwe, Pakistan, and Malawi. However, the majority of cigarette consumption takes place in the developed world.

Dr. Nicholas Hopkinson, from the National Heart and Lung Institute at Imperial, said: "Smokers in the developed world are literally and metaphorically burning the resources of poorer countries."

A lifelong impact

The report also calculates the environmental impact of a single smoker over their lifetime: a person smoking a pack of 20 cigarettes per day for 50 years is responsible for 1.4 million litres of water depletion.

The report calls for a range of actions to address these issues. These include strengthening the global evidence base so that gaps in the current environmental data can be filled, encouraging sustainable investment as well as making sure that the environmental cost of is included in the price, and encouraging the industry to take responsibility for the whole life cycle of its products.

The report is based on a scientific analysis published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology.

Explore further

Smoking: a rundown on lighting up

More information: Maria Zafeiridou et al. Cigarette Smoking: An Assessment of Tobacco's Global Environmental Footprint Across Its Entire Supply Chain, Environmental Science & Technology (2018). DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01533
Citation: Cigarettes have a significant impact on the environment, not just health (2018, October 2) retrieved 15 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Oct 02, 2018
Now subtract the impact of all the people who die prematurely due to tobacco

Oct 02, 2018
The devastating impact of the automotive industry on human health is well known. However, a new report systematically outlines for the first time the substantial impact of the automotive industry on the environment.

Oct 02, 2018
They didn't even include cigarette-started wildfires.

Oct 02, 2018
Climate change? Who writes this crap? Notice no university.

Oct 02, 2018

Don't worry. Tthe reduction in lung cancers will be more then made up for with increased stomach and colon cancers when the Po210 on tobacco fields enters the food supply.

Oct 03, 2018
Smokers are morons and in the West, much of it is now more or less confined to the less educated, poor. But it's still legal and the fact smokers die younger than the normal age for death actually saves money in the long run. There are other costs associated with smoking. In Toronto, idiots caused 80 fires this year tossing cigarette butts of apartment balconies.

Oct 03, 2018
I do not comment much on Physorg anymore; it is not worth my time because the site does not care about the quality of the comments. But I find that it is still a good science news aggregator. I do take the time to read some comments just for fun... There are always good jokes in those columns. The joke of the day in this one is not a comment but a commentator:


Climate change? Who writes this crap? Notice no university.

This "crap" as you say, was conducted by one of the world top universities: Imperial College London. If you would had only took the time to click on the DOI link you would had saved yourself a major embarrassment. Now we all know that you suffer from intellectual laziness.

For those interested to read the full paper, here it is:

Oct 03, 2018
This would have been a study with substance, until they added the shite of climate change.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more