Astronomers find first compelling evidence for a moon outside our solar system

October 3, 2018, Columbia University
Artist's impression of the exoplanet Kepler-1625b, transiting the star, with the candidate exomoon in tow. Credit: Dan Durda

A pair of Columbia University astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope and Kepler Space Telescope have assembled compelling evidence for the existence of a moon orbiting a gas-giant planet 8,000 light-years away.

In a paper published Oct. 3 in the journal Science Advances, Alex Teachey and David Kipping report that the detection of a candidate exomoon—that is, moons orbiting in other star systems—is unusual because of its large size, comparable to the diameter of Neptune. Such gargantuan moons do not exist in our own solar system, where nearly 200 natural satellites have been cataloged.

"This would be the first case of detecting a outside our solar system," said Kipping, an assistant professor of astronomy at Columbia. "If confirmed by follow-up Hubble observations, the finding could provide vital clues about the development of planetary systems and may cause experts to revisit theories of how moons form around planets."

In looking for exomoons, the researchers analyzed data from 284 Kepler-discovered planets that were in comparatively wide orbits, with periods greater than 30 days, around their host star. The observations measured the momentary dimming of starlight as a planet passed in front of its star, called a transit. The researchers found one instance, in Kepler 1625b, that had intriguing anomalies.

Artist’s impression of the exoplanet Kepler-1625b transiting the star with the candidate exomoon in tow. Credit: Dan Durda
"We saw little deviations and wobbles in the light curve that caught our attention," Kipping said.

The Kepler results were enough for the team to get 40 hours of time with Hubble to intensively study the planet, obtaining data four times more precise than that of Kepler. The researchers monitored the planet before and during its 19-hour-long transit across the face of the star. After it ended, Hubble detected a second and much smaller decrease in the star's brightness 3.5 hours later, consistent with "a moon trailing the planet like a dog following its owner on a leash," Kipping said. "Unfortunately, the scheduled Hubble observations ended before the complete transit of the moon could be measured."

In addition to this dip in light, Hubble provided supporting evidence for the moon hypothesis by measuring that the planet began its transit 1.25 hours earlier than predicted. This is consistent with the planet and moon orbiting a common center of gravity (barycenter) that would cause the planet to wobble from its predicted location.

Animation showing the corrected WFC3 images of Kepler-1625. The star is located in the center and is spread out horizontally due to the instrument’s grism, giving the observer’s color information about the source. Credit: Alex Teachey & David Kipping
"An extraterrestrial civilization watching the Earth and Moon transit the Sun would note similar anomalies in the timing of Earth's transit," Kipping said.

The researchers note that in principle this anomaly could be caused by the gravitational pull of a hypothetical second planet in the system, although Kepler found no evidence for additional planets around the star during its four-year mission.

"A companion moon is the simplest and most natural explanation for the second dip in the light curve and the orbit-timing deviation," said lead author Teachey, NSF Graduate Fellow in astronomy at Columbia. "It was a shocking moment to see that light curve, my heart started beating a little faster and I just kept looking at that signature. But we knew our job was to keep a level head testing every conceivable way in which the data could be tricking us until we were left with no other explanation."

The moon is estimated to be only 1.5 percent the mass of its companion planet, which itself estimated to be several times the mass of Jupiter. This value is close to the mass-ratio between the Earth and its moon. But in the case of the Earth-Moon system and the Pluto-Charon system—the largest of the five known natural satellites of the dwarf planet Pluto—an early collision with a larger body is hypothesized to have blasted off material that later coalesced into a moon. Kepler 1625b and its satellite, however, are gaseous, not rocky, and, therefore, such a collision may not lead to the condensation of a satellite.

Exomoons are difficult to find because they are smaller than their companion planet and so their transit signal is weak; they also shift position with each transit because the moon is orbiting the planet. In addition, the ideal candidate planets hosting moons are in large orbits, with long and infrequent times. In this search, the Neptune-sized moon would have been among the easiest to first detect because of its large size.

The host planet and its moon lie within the solar mass star's (Kepler 1625) habitable zone, where moderate temperatures allow for the existence of liquid water on any solid planetary surface. "Both bodies, however, are considered to be gaseous and therefore unsuitable for life as we know it," Kipping said.

Future searches will target Jupiter-sized planets that are farther from their star than Earth is from the Sun. There are just a handful of these in the Kepler database. NASA's upcoming James Webb Space Telescope could really "clean-up" in the satellite search, Kipping said. "We can expect to see really tiny moons."

Explore further: Possible first sighting of an exomoon

More information: A. Teachey el al., "Evidence for a large exomoon orbiting Kepler-1625b," Science Advances (2018). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aav1784 , http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/10/eaav1784

Related Stories

Possible first sighting of an exomoon

July 28, 2017

(Phys.org)—A team led by David Kipping of Columbia University has spotted what might be the first evidence of an exomoon. They have written a paper describing their findings and have uploaded it to the arXiv preprint server.

How to weigh a star using a moon

October 15, 2010

How do astronomers weigh a star that's trillions of miles away and way too big to fit on a bathroom scale? In most cases they can't, although they can get a best estimate using computer models of stellar structure.

Newfound planet is Earth-mass but gassy

January 6, 2014

An international team of astronomers has discovered the first Earth-mass planet that transits, or crosses in front of, its host star. KOI-314c is the lightest planet to have both its mass and physical size measured. Surprisingly, ...

Recommended for you

InSight lander 'hears' Martian winds

December 7, 2018

NASA's Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport InSight lander, which touched down on Mars just 10 days ago, has provided the first ever "sounds" of Martian winds on the Red Planet. A ...

An exoplanet loses its atmosphere in the form of a tail

December 6, 2018

A new study led by scientists from the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC) reveals that the giant exoplanet WASP-69b carries a comet-like tail made up of helium particles escaping from its gravitational field and ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

wduckss
1 / 5 (3) Oct 03, 2018
The data is pretty confusing. Most of the data indicates that Kepler 1625b tidally locked or on the border. It is too early to spend energy to the story of the month. It is particularly unconvincing to claim that the density is 10.15 g / cm3. (distance of star 0.811-0.8748 AU, orbital period 287 days; It is also very dense at up to 10.15 g/cm^3; Star Kepler 1625 0,96-1,079 M Sun; .. https://en.wikipe...r-1625b)
rrwillsj
1 / 5 (1) Oct 04, 2018
Well duck, this system isn't following the rule book, per your expectations.

Better get use to having your cage rattled. So far it is looking like every star and every star system is going to include the unexpected and the unpredicted.

More evidence for the speculation that stellar formation and resultant planetary systems are not only NOT systematic. But a stochastic process of random chance modified by tumultuous mayhem.

Considering this is Cosmos wide? A form of Brownian Movement on a Universal scale? Would it mean we are all inhabiting a prodigious fishbowl?
torbjorn_b_g_larsson
3 / 5 (2) Oct 07, 2018
The data is pretty confusing. Most of the data indicates that Kepler 1625b tidally locked or on the border. It is too early to spend energy to the story of the month. It is particularly unconvincing to claim that the density is 10.15 g / cm3.


The data you refer to is rather irrelevant to the moon observation, but it looks quite ordinary. Kepler 1625b orbits it star at a Venus equivalent distance, and Venus is a near tidal lock. The moon contributes a mass:

"However, it is up to 10 times more massive (about 3,180 Earth masses), based on observations of its candidate moon. This puts it just below the deuterium-fusing limit, which is around 13 Jupiter masses. Any more massive and Kepler-1625b would be a brown dwarf. Because of this high mass and radius, the planet likely has a very strong gravitational pull,".

A near brown dwarf, or a low fusion star, would be dense.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.