Water in small dust grains can explain large amounts of water on Earth

September 12, 2018, Netherlands Research School for Astronomy
Artist impression of a very young star surrounded by a disk of gas and dust. Scientists suspect that rocky planets such as the Earth are formed from these materials. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

Water trapped in dust grains from which the Earth formed can explain the current large amount of water on Earth.

This is suggested by scientists from the Netherlands, Germany and the United Kingdom, based on calculations and simulations. The research will appear in two articles in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

For a long time scientists have struggled with an explanation for the large amount of water on Earth. A first scenario states that the water is delivered by comets and asteroids that hit the Earth. According to a second scenario, the Earth was born 'wet' and the water was already present on ten-kilometer-big boulders from which the Earth was built up. However, the amount of water that these large boulders can contain is limited.

Now, an international team of scientists has devised and calculated a variant of the boulder-with-water scenario. The team shows that in the region where the Earth once originated, small to millimeter-sized dust grains can hold enough water. The water-rich grains then clump together to form pebbles and eventually kilometer-sized boulders. These boulders can then contain large amounts of water and they will eventually proceed to form Earth.

The new calculations also show that the small can collect enough water in 'only' a million years to explain the amount of on Earth. A million years fits easily in the time it takes to form the larger .

Explore further: From dust to pebbles to planets – insight into the birth of a solar system

More information: Warm dust surface chemistry in protoplanetary disks - Formation of phyllosilicates. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2018.

On water delivery in the inner solar nebula - Monte Carlo simulations of forsterite hydration. arxiv.org/abs/1808.06183

Related Stories

Chemistry can change the ingredients in planet formation

March 1, 2018

Planet and star formation starts with a lot of material collapsing, falling down onto itself because of gravity. In the middle of this, a protostar is being formed. This star will then start to get warm and eventually glow. ...

Large water reservoirs at the dawn of stellar birth

October 9, 2012

(Phys.org)—ESA's Herschel space observatory has discovered enough water vapour to fill Earth's oceans more than 2000 times over, in a gas and dust cloud that is on the verge of collapsing into a new Sun-like star.

Recommended for you

Exoplanet stepping stones

November 20, 2018

Astronomers have gleaned some of the best data yet on the composition of a planet known as HR 8799c—a young giant gas planet about 7 times the mass of Jupiter that orbits its star every 200 years.

Encouraging prospects for moon hunters

November 20, 2018

Astrophysicists of the University of Zürich, ETH Zürich and the NCCR PlanetS show how the icy moons of Uranus were born. Their result suggests that such potentially habitable worlds are much more abundant in the Universe ...

Gravitationally lensed quasars

November 19, 2018

The path of light is bent by mass, an effect predicted by Einstein's theory of gravity, and when a massive galaxy or cluster lies along our line-of-sight to a more distant galaxy its matter will act as a lens to image the ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jonesdave
2.6 / 5 (5) Sep 12, 2018
Unfortunately, the first paper is not yet accepted, so can't be read. Having skipped through the Arxiv paper, one question comes to mind that they don't directly address - the Earth has a higher D/H ratio than the C chondrites. I assume that they take for granted that the ratio will alter over the lifetime of the Earth, or due to the mixing of different ratios in the different classifications of C-chondrites.
The bulk ratio for Earth D/H is 1.49 x 10^-4. C-chondrites vary, being mostly lower than Earthly values, but not massively so. CR chondrites have the nearest values to Earth, being 1.61 - 1.88 (i.e. slightly higher).
In short, it looks like a reasonable mechanism, particularly given the measured D/H ratios of comets mostly being much higher than terrestrial values.

https://www.resea...16211887

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.